Q Anon: 07/29/18 "Trust The Plan"

To: stars & stripes forever

DUTCHSINSE (Earthquake 3D Live Seismic Stream) noticed the fires coincided with methane plumes along the fault lines in western states.

Subterranean fires? And on post number...what?

San Andreas, pray for us.

761 posted on 07/30/2018 7:40:25 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

762 posted on 07/30/2018 7:40:35 PM PDT by madison10 (Pray for those in harm's way in California.)

Yeap all that came back to me as I read your post. Somewhere after 9-11 we ran across it on the TM thread, then it went screwy...

763 posted on 07/30/2018 7:40:58 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Thank you Free Republic. Thank you President Donald J Trump, Greatest election Ever.)

To: blu; No_Doll_i; Cboldt; barbarianbabs; grey_whiskers; Melian; SheepWhisperer; Yo-Yo

Thank you all (and others) for the kind words and thoughts on the loss of my dog.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Q Team is racing headlong toward #1776 aren’t they? I’m thinking that will be a big drop.

FReeQ On,
Kit

764 posted on 07/30/2018 7:41:09 PM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

To: Disestablishmentarian

If you look at other recent fires the trademarks are always the same, fires burning in a house yet materials that are combustible or should melt are left unscathed and the house vaporizes. the same goes for trees adjacent to the house, they still stand and no mas casa.

Additionally, setting the fires calls into action the US Government when requested and of course Trump did so. The voters out here I hope will notice that sans Trump and that help the State Government would just sit on their thumb and whine, or not set the fire in the first place. Sounds like a false flag to me, a distraction or another “Puerto Rico” opportunity to mis handle aid coming in

What it will do is drive more folks out of the state worst case

These people are indeed stupid

765 posted on 07/30/2018 7:43:02 PM PDT by 100American (Knowledge is knowing how, Wisdom is knowing when)

What is "U-access?

Universal?

766 posted on 07/30/2018 7:43:11 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

Nice try, swampy.

I trust President Trump over you on this one.

Because he isn't pursuing vendettas, nor power, nor wealth: but restoration.

I'm sure germs of all sorts railed against the inmicrobioty of penicillin, too.

767 posted on 07/30/2018 7:43:28 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

Here we go again with the slide.

In fact, I haven't even published the slide on this thread. Ooops.

I have published all sorts of other comments, most with links and pictures, many responses to posts by other people make.

Meanwhile I bet out of your posts in the last week 40% or more are insults or snarky advice directed at me. And you say my posts are getting tiresome!. Ha ha, now that's funny!

768 posted on 07/30/2018 7:43:33 PM PDT by Jack Black

Well, according to that timeline then, Al-Waleed could have got Avenatti on the case well before he was hung upside down by his raggedy feet.

That's a good thing to know. So Al-Waleed is probably safely out of the game. (We hope).

Thanks for the research edzo, the hardest working man in show business. (TEXOKIE is the hardest working woman.)

Bagster

769 posted on 07/30/2018 7:44:20 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

To: blu; bagster

Concur.

U-Access = “Universal Access” (NSA?)

“We have it all.”

770 posted on 07/30/2018 7:44:59 PM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

I think he is with Q and just took the pictures of the front of Avenatti’s building posted in q post 1752 hence the phone in his hand.
also if he was with avenatti they wouldn’t have reported it to the POPO as in the link in Q 1766

771 posted on 07/30/2018 7:45:10 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")

772 posted on 07/30/2018 7:45:51 PM PDT by DAVEY CROCKETT (Thank you Free Republic. Thank you President Donald J Trump, Greatest election Ever.)

No mention of strozck being fired?

Strzok was fired? Really? When? Because he was still an FBI employee when he was giving his public testimony to the House Select Committee a couple weeks ago, and the FBI even sent a couple attorneys to help him, right?

What about Page?

She wasn't fired, either. She resigned.

Ohr demotion?

As you say Ohr was not fired. As soon as they fire him, I'll add him.

Until then it's just a FBI job reassignment. Did he lose a pay-grade as a result of a publicly released OIG report? Is their any official public record of any sanction, other than he's no longer heading this or that section.

The fellow who *is* on my chart, Andrew McCabe was fired after a) the inspector general's report said he had lied and b) the Office of Professional Responsibility recommended he be fired. That's the gold standard in firings. Got any more like that?

Those are "objective facts". It happened, even the NY Times had to report that. That's what I'm looking for, which is why (besides the rare public firing for cause) I'm so focused on indictments, guilty pleas, trials, and convictions! These are indisputable objective facts. And I love them!

The fact that none of the top three conspirators you mentioned have actually been fired gets to exactly my point. Team Trump's public, objective, verifyable response to the wrong doing (really an attempt at a Coup) has been weak, very weak.

And I am on this thread every day, just like the rest of you so I am aware that there is according to Q a behind the scenes orchestration of a soon-to-come massive day of reckoning.

I look forward to it, as much as the rest of you. But I still think it's good to have some objective measure of what has actually happened to the people we think were doing nefarious things. (So far: not much)

Why haven't all these people been fired and charged with multiple crimes?

You mention:About a dozen other Govt officials (fbi doj).

Well, I have kept track and I am not aware of anyone other than McCabe being fired for wrong doing who is a major player in the Mueller / Deep State Coup attempt.

Yes, there was an exodus of people at the start of the Trump admin. You would agree that it's pretty normal for people to be let go at the start of an administration - and not always just the political apointees, but some of their deputies. I don't think people leaving the FBI or DOJ before Mueller was even appointed can be counted as a response to it.

I don't think James Comey's firing, which was sighted by almost everyone as the proximate cause of needing a independent counsel can be fairly counted as a response to the appointment of him.

Do I think it's great that all these people are gone? YES!

Do I think it's a good think that we acknowledge that Trump has gotten rid of a lot of bad people in the DOJ / FBI? YES? And I mention in my "notes" at the bottom of my chart that such a list in maintained and published at the top of every thread by Ransomnote (although looking just now I can't find it - the chart was restructured - I'll ask her to re-add it.).

Cheers!

773 posted on 07/30/2018 7:46:06 PM PDT by Jack Black

do kilts count?

I love kilts, as long as I get one also!

774 posted on 07/30/2018 7:49:16 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

WOW! Thanks for posting that, bitt!

775 posted on 07/30/2018 7:49:51 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

you may be right, I just gave my reason why I lean the other way I’m maybe 60/40 that it is about funding not footage.
I wasn’t saying i’m right you’re wrong just I have a different opinion.

also Q has said things have double meanings so it could be both.

776 posted on 07/30/2018 7:50:55 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")

LoL it went from a 48 hour bloodbath over bewbs to dancing in the streets over there.

777 posted on 07/30/2018 7:51:08 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

also if he was with avenatti they wouldn’t have reported it to the POPO as in the link in Q 1766

If he was trying to disassociate himself from his muscle, he would definitely report it to the popo. To create the illusion you just posted.

Bagster

778 posted on 07/30/2018 7:51:15 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

779 posted on 07/30/2018 7:52:30 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

To: blu; bagster

U-Access could also mean “Unauthorized Access”, which might make sense in the context of “U-Access kills.”

Universal access could kill in the sense that being able to access anything will provide the truths of the cabal comms.

Unauthorized access could kill when black hats access things they shouldn’t without authorization.

???
Q equals Questions...

K = KEK! :)

780 posted on 07/30/2018 7:52:31 PM PDT by KitJ (Shall not be infringed...)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794