Q Anon: 07/29/18 "Trust The Plan"

I am not convinced yet it is Deniro, but i'll give it a 5% chance. and that is only cause of the Martin Scorsese looking glasses the guy in the Q post is wearing.

:^)

Veteran - Actor - Platform - Shoes - Scene As the veteran actor, 74, was snapped wearing black platform shoes as he filmed a scene walking out of a store in New York City, despite already clocking in at a respectable 5ft10in. De Niro was seen doing another take without the added inches for Martin Scorsese's movie The Irishman, which was grabbed by Netflix.

161 posted on 07/29/2018 2:21:13 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")

See the green screen. He’s on set. The camera won’t show them. Alan Ladd used to stand on a box for his close up scenes with other actors.

162 posted on 07/29/2018 2:25:15 PM PDT by Seruzawa (TANSTAAFL!)

thanks. I apologize. Now I'm not sure. I found the CNN article by Acosta

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/21/politics/trump-cohen-recording-privilege/index.html

explaining the whys & how's of the waiver.
Yet in the CNN article, this : "The transaction never happened, Giuliani told CNN".

What I was relying on was a Davis quote for "The Hill" which I might be mis-reading: http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/399362-giuliani-we-warned-cohen-that-he-violated-attorney-client-privilege

"“Mr. Giuliani seems to be confused. He expressly waived attorney client privilege last week and repeatedly and inaccurately — as proven by the tape — talked and talked about the recording, forfeiting all confidentiality,” Davis said in a statement to The Hill."

I think I'll shut-up now until I can find the truth here.

163 posted on 07/29/2018 2:25:20 PM PDT by stylin19a (Best.Election.of.All-Times.Ever.In.The.History.Of.Ever)

I feel bad for Michael they should have told him to change the missile tweet picture to a helicopter search light so he could at least match the troll narrative...

164 posted on 07/29/2018 2:28:52 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")

Here’s a couple answers from an archive of his blog page:

https://web.archive.org/web/20171209075213/http://avenatti.com:80/bio/

1. Work experience with FISA

2. Political opposition research firm run by Rahm Emanuel

Or ... as Hannity calls him, “Rahm ‘Dead Fish’ Emanuel”, the Mayor of Chicago

165 posted on 07/29/2018 2:29:39 PM PDT by Steven W.

MOS? How about:

A United States military occupation code, or a military occupational specialty code (MOS code), is a nine-character code used in the United States Army and United States Marines to identify a specific job. In the United States Air Force, a system of Air Force Specialty Codes (AFSC) is used. In the United States Navy, a system of naval ratings and designators are used along with the Navy Enlisted Classification (NEC) system.

166 posted on 07/29/2018 2:30:09 PM PDT by Unrepentant VN Vet (...against all enemies, foreign or domestic...)

5’10”, bawaaaaaaaaaaaaa

167 posted on 07/29/2018 2:30:17 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

NEW Q

#1760>p> Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 469e5a No.2343381
Jul 29 2018 16:28:29 (EST)

Anonymous ID: 0c3b81 No.2342903
Jul 29 2018 16:01:55 (EST) Screenshot_2018-07-29 Michael Avenatti on Twitter.png

>>2342854

Q !CbboFOtcZs No.100 📁
Jun 10 2018 22:11:35 (EST)

Start the Clock.
A Week to [Remember].
Think Logically.
First private [CLAS-5(6)]
Second public.
Blackwater on GUARD.
Evidence KILLS.
These people are STUPID.
Q

>>2342903

_____________________________________________________

168 posted on 07/29/2018 2:34:32 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

To: Unrepentant VN Vet; Swordmaker

I saw that, too, when I looked at list of possible acronyms.

But the others were right, IMO, in that context "C_A/MOS" - I think it has to be 'company' / MOSsad

ALL - in the pic at Avenatti's office, there is also a car approaching in the distance that might be of interest here; I blew it up but can't make out anything worthwhile. Some are speculating it's the head of Democrat Party in CA, Eric Bauman but I don't think so

169 posted on 07/29/2018 2:38:15 PM PDT by Steven W.

NOTE ref to Blackwater; the other day when DJTjr & the Mule were at Reagan National, it was ref’d that DJTjr clearly had security folk(s) alongside - but they may have been private; remember they ditched USSS and we just saw Ranier bail release which included former head of agency as (presumably defense) selection to guard him (Ranier)

170 posted on 07/29/2018 2:40:51 PM PDT by Steven W.

To: Gulf War One

Have not seen the Avogadro Constant in decades. Made me chuckle.

Think moles.

Learn our comms.

;-)

171 posted on 07/29/2018 2:41:31 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

I lost score a while ago. so I did minimum research (rowdy=slacker) and re-discovered....

Rosenweasel appointed Mueller. One day after Trump said “Nope!” to Mulehead heading up the FBI.

So, one would think that these two clowns are of the same mind. Unless (needle scratching over the record)....Rosenweasel really is a white hat (oiy! the stabbing pains in my gut!) and he put Mueller onboard to draw the heat and head the “show”. Remember, Rosenweasel was pressured by the Democrats to appoint a Special Counsel.

So, I’m finally going to have to pick a side. I think Rosenweasel and Mueller are at the very least grey hats. As much as I despise Rosenweasel for the way he acted towards Congress, he and the Mule are serving a purpose. They are letting the Dems think they (the Dems) are in control and got this all in the bag.

Disinformation is a powerful weapon.

172 posted on 07/29/2018 2:42:18 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

To: ransomnote; TEXOKIE

Go to you tube

Peter Benchley Recollections, date unknown. Tape 1.

LBJ Library

In honor of Shark Week, I wanted to share a video I came across about the author of JAWS, Peter Benchley while I was digging earlier today. The youtube link to the interview is above.

Most people recognize the iconic picture on the front of Peter Benchley's paperback bestseller, Jaws and know the movie was directed by Stephen Spielberg. But I wonder how many know Peter Benchley was a Speech writer and White House Staff Assistant, 1967-1968 in the Lyndon Johnson Administration. I wonder if people know Benchley also had a "Q" security clearance.

The taped interview is Quite interesting. At minute marker 29:37 Mr. Benchley relates he was given Q Clearance, he did not understand it and he did not want it. He says in the interview he was instructed to obtain a shredder however he did not and says he disposed of documents via the waste paper basket. Later in the interview at minute marker 59:14, Mr. Benchley hears and is distracted by a toilet flushing at which point he laughs and says "Hi, just have a pee for me." (Pee tape-where have I heard that lately?)I did say the interview is Quite interesting.

I wonder how many people know Peter Benchley wrote another book called Q Clearance.Q Clearance was not so well known in drawing the attention of the people to "watch the water" for sharks as Jaws did but it could become a late blooming summer blockbuster. The following is a bibliography of Peter Benchley's book, Q Clearance.

Q Clearance

Peter Benchley

In this novel the author of Jaws reveals that he knows as much about the White House as he does about the sea: a knowledge which is the 'special ingredient' in an irresistibly hilarious and suspenseful story.

Timothy Burnham works – as Peter Benchley once did – as a speechwriter to the President. He has been in the same room as the great man, but only with a lot of other people, and he likes it that way – he is that rarity in Washington, a man with no appetite for power.

By a quirk of bureaucracy Burnham is given Q Clearance, which means that every day he receives documents crammed with the highest atomic secrets of which he understands not a word, and which he has to shred every night.

Big joke, thinks Burham – but he does not laugh when for unfathomable reasons he suddenly becomes the President's blue-eyed boy. That, he knows, is more than he can cope with – except that, exhilaratingly, the terrifying old man seems to bring out in Burnham more than Burnham knew was there.

While this nerve-racking relationship is developing, Burnham meets a lovely blonde. It does not occur to him that a lovely blonde might show obvious interest in a man with Q Clearance, who enjoys the confidence of his President, for some reason other than their enjoyable compatibility.

Add to this situation a White House cleaning lady from Bermuda who is desperate to procure for her son a certificate of graduation from high school; an enigmatic caterer whose past is known to nobody (or at least, to nobody in the United States); and several members of the President's Cabinet – figures who would be larger than life if they were not so devastatingly true to it – and you have a spy novel that is pure pleasure: a wonderful balancing act between fidelity to a mind-boggling reality and a genius for entertainment.

173 posted on 07/29/2018 2:43:01 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

To: ransomnote; Cats Pajamas; greeneyes; bagster; generally; Wneighbor; mairdie; Swordmaker; ...

Hi ransomnote, all! Posting blind and behind, as usual! so.... if others are already talking about this, then, I’m hopefully and helpfully chiming in!

During the Blood Moon lunar eclipse event, I kept thinking of how Q told us that stuff would be happening after the “SKY EVENT” and that things would pop. Note we are still in July, and future is proving past.

That indeed does seem to be proving out, at least in my opinion. As Q noted in his recent Flurry, with bold letters yet, that the FISA release IS CRITICAL TO THE WHOLE THING! [texokie’s paraphrase]
*** *** *** *** *** ***
Another topic that has come in to me over the Qanteen transom, not from FReeQanon, but from another source. This article is so good, and so important, because it examines so well the mindset of our Chinese adversaries. I am taking this opportunity to post it in full.

[The Chinese “get it.”] :

July 29, 2018
Meanwhile, the Chinese think Trump is a genius
By Monica Showalter

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2018/07/the_chinese_think_trump_is_a_genius.html#ixzz5MgIiWV3c

Has anyone ever called the Chinese ‘stupid’? Not those guys.

So now they’re reading President Trump, and unlike the childish Eurotrash of western Europe, they see a shrewd, wily, chess-playing, Sun Tzu-grade genius, who could easily checkmate them, and they’ve got a lot of reasons for thinking so.

That’s the report from a European policy-domo, who actually went to Beijing and asked the local leaders what they were seeing. The report that European Council of Foreign Relations President Mark Leonard gives, in the Financial Times, is well worth the subscription or trial subscription to read it. Some of his thoughts from the pice can be read on Instapundit, however. Here’s a bit of what Glenn Reynolds posted:

I have just spent a week in Beijing talking to officials and intellectuals, many of whom are awed by his skill as a strategist and tactician. . . .

Few Chinese think that Mr Trump’s primary concern is to rebalance the bilateral trade deficit. If it were, they say, he would have aligned with the EU, Japan and Canada against China rather than scooping up America’s allies in his tariff dragnet. They think the US president’s goal is nothing less than remaking the global order.

[The link has a video inset link at this point]

They think Mr Trump feels he is presiding over the relative decline of his great nation. It is not that the current order does not benefit the US. The problem is that it benefits others more in relative terms. To make things worse the US is investing billions of dollars and a fair amount of blood in supporting the very alliances and international institutions that are constraining America and facilitating China’s rise.

In Chinese eyes, Mr Trump’s response is a form of “creative destruction”. He is systematically destroying the existing institutions — from the World Trade Organization and the North American Free Trade Agreement to Nato and the Iran nuclear deal — as a first step towards renegotiating the world order on terms more favourable to Washington.

Once the order is destroyed, the Chinese elite believes, Mr Trump will move to stage two: renegotiating America’s relationship with other powers. Because the US is still the most powerful country in the world, it will be able to negotiate with other countries from a position of strength if it deals with them one at a time rather than through multilateral institutions that empower the weak at the expense of the strong.

My interlocutors say that Mr Trump is the US first president for more than 40 years to bash China on three fronts simultaneously: trade, military and ideology. They describe him as a master tactician, focusing on one issue at a time, and extracting as many concessions as he can. They speak of the skilful way Mr Trump has treated President Xi Jinping. “Look at how he handled North Korea,” one says. “He got Xi Jinping to agree to UN sanctions [half a dozen] times, creating an economic stranglehold on the country. China almost turned North Korea into a sworn enemy of the country.” But they also see him as a strategist, willing to declare a truce in each area when there are no more concessions to be had, and then start again with a new front.

Wow. So the Chinese watched the Trump dramas in Quebec and Singapore and Brussels and Helsinki closely, and drew their own conclusions as to what was going on from them. Keep your friends close and your enemies closer, as Sun Tzu used to say. The slaparound of Justin Trudeau in Canada, the rapprochement with North Korea’s dictator Kim Jong Un in Singapore, the second slaparound at NATO headquarters in Belgium and the lovefest with Vladimir Putin in Finland had quite an effect in China, where the locals recognized the dictum in action.

What a coincidence, Trump just happens to be a student of Sun Tzu, the famous Chinese strategist, who wrote “The Art of War.”

Apparently, the Chinese didn’t see a madman (and being pals with Kim, don’t think the Chinese aren’t well-experienced with so-called madmen) the way the Europeans and the U.S. left did. They saw a power player, someone intent on taking down the world order that the U.S. pays full freight on, yet gets very little from. After all, who cleaned up after the Iraq War was fought, (with U.S. blood and treasure, along with its dragged-along, unwilling allies), and then got all the oil? The Chinese, of course.

Naturally, that means that up until now, they’ve considered the U.S. a sucker. Note that the Chinese guy Leonard quotes is the very Chicom, now-former Vice Minister of Foreign Affairs He Yafei, who had fun browbeating President Obama openly in Copenhagen a few years ago, and Obama just took it.

He’s not talking the same way about Trump.

They see Trump as breaking up the multilateral institutions of the post-war order that so stiff the Americans, and then holding out for a better deal for the U.S. on them, which does kind of make sense. After all, Trump is saying that’s his idea in the trade war back and forths, over tariffs and pacts.

Maybe President Trump is doing this instinctively, or maybe he’s doing it with a plan in mind, something that makes the Trump-haters laugh. (Recall though, that his earlier policy guru, Steve Bannon, did focus intently on China.)

What’s clear though, is that the Chinese have a healthy respect for the U.S. now, and don’t focus on mannerisms the way the Eurotrash and their mannerist leftist U.S. allies do, just the actual substance of Dealing with Trump.

Was it Sun Tzu or someone who noted the importance of persuading your adversaries that you are more powerful than you may appear to be?

Actually Trump himself did, in this Sun Tzu tweet here. Trump, after all, is a big fan of Sun Tzu.

POTUS’ TWEET:
“The Supreme Art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting.” — Sun Tzu
8:04 AM - 17 Jul 2012

174 posted on 07/29/2018 2:43:10 PM PDT by TEXOKIE

To: miss marmelstein

I’m all for Q threads since it took you off your vile anti-woman threads. You’re pretty stupid when it comes right down to it.

Meanie.

I thought we were friends.

Now toddle off and drink your ovaltine, sweetie. There's a good girl.

Bagster

175 posted on 07/29/2018 2:43:24 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

To: Disestablishmentarian

Uh...guess we’ll see soon, won’t we?

176 posted on 07/29/2018 2:43:46 PM PDT by TrueFact (Critical thinking about EVERYTHING.... tough but required.)

To: Gulf War One; grey_whiskers

I used to have a button many years ago that said, "Everyone has Avogadro's number".

Avogadro would make a cool code word for a mole.

Laissez le bon Trump rouler!

Garde la Foi, mes amis! Nous nous sommes les sauveurs de la République! Maintenant et Toujours!
(Keep the Faith, my friends! We are the saviors of the Republic! Now and Forever!)
LonePalm, le Républicain du verre cassé (The Broken Glass Republican)

177 posted on 07/29/2018 2:44:39 PM PDT by LonePalm (Commander and Chef)

I thought + posted about this the other night - I am one who considers them possibly grey hats or leveraged; but I once considered white hats and now think, no, even if you could possibly consider them ‘white hats’, you have to treat them + plan for them to be grey. Even if you thought they were ‘good’ or had ‘leverage’, the DS may have more.

I will flip & flop on this up until the very end and thereafter.

It’s a great show!

178 posted on 07/29/2018 2:45:05 PM PDT by Steven W.

179 posted on 07/29/2018 2:45:38 PM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)

It’s Robert De Niro.
He’s been screaming about Trump.

Not unless Deniro had a total body transplant.

Deniro is 74 years old.

Bagster

180 posted on 07/29/2018 2:45:57 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794