Q Anon: 07/25/18 "Trust The Plan"

The Drive, in great detail, and with several updates, tries to prove conclusively that these were artifacts of a helicopter flight, and indicates that the images were time-lapsed every 40 to 45 seconds. Certainly looks like a missile, but wouldn't make sense in a time lapse, since such a missile would definitely be out of the frame in less than 20 seconds or so.

Let's Talk About That Mysterious 'Rocket Launch Over Whidbey Island' Photo (Updated)

1,521 posted on 07/28/2018 6:16:02 PM PDT by Fractal Trader

1,522 posted on 07/28/2018 6:19:43 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)

Wasn’t there a video that Q put out about leadership with the plot of a guy dancing at a concert who finally gets someone else to dance, which starts everyone dancing?

Sorry, I don't remember anything like that, but if you find it, I'd love to see it.

1,523 posted on 07/28/2018 6:26:47 PM PDT by blu (WWG1WGA)

To: Fractal Trader

since such a missile would definitely be out of the frame in less than 20 seconds or so.

not true, the further away the camera is the greater the field of view would cover
for example in the diagram below at ten feet from the lens the field of view is ten feet wide, but at a hundred feet the view is 100 feet wide, therefore a camera 5 mile away would have a field of view five miles wide.

1,524 posted on 07/28/2018 6:27:32 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

thats a Pushy Riot,

That's the James Bond/Sean Connery accent.

Pushy Galore.

Bagster

1,525 posted on 07/28/2018 6:36:08 PM PDT by bagster ( "Even bad men love their mamas.")

Ya might want to at least get your facts straight before spouting off about anything here.

I do my best, but like everyone else I make mistakes sometimes. What facts in particular that I posted are you saying I got wrong?

Believe it or not (in your case probably not) there are a lot of people here that have done the research and happen to be very well versed in current and past events.

Why would I not believe that? Of course there are tons of knowledgeable Freepers on all sorts of topics. I wouldn't be posting here still if I didn't experience that all the time.

Now sliding the thread I will have to give you at least a 5 for now, we’ll see how the evening progresses.

OK, well thanks, I guess. 5 out of 10? OK, better than a 1.

Go fact check where FB came from then come back.

Well I am pretty familiar with the official story, I read the book that the movie "Social Network" was created from. And I'm aware of the theory that some of the technology was developed at the CIA, and nefarious methods used to get it to Zuck. I don't necessarily believe that theory.

I mentioned My Space - are YOU familiar with that platform? Here is a bit about its history from Wikipedia:

Fox Interactive Media headquarters, 407 North Maple Drive, Beverly Hills, California, where Myspace is also housed. In August 2003, several eUniverse employees with Friendster accounts saw potential in its social networking features. The group decided to mimic the more popular features of the website. Within 10 days, the first version of Myspace was ready for launch, implemented using ColdFusion.[11][19] A complete infrastructure of finance, human resources, technical expertise, bandwidth, and server capacity was available for the site. The project was overseen by Brad Greenspan (eUniverse's Founder, Chairman, CEO), who managed Chris DeWolfe (MySpace's starting CEO), Josh Berman, Tom Anderson (MySpace's starting president), and a team of programmers and resources provided by eUniverse.

Now, lets look at the Facebook timeline:

Facebook is an American online social media and social networking service company based in Menlo Park, California. Its website was launched on February 4, 2004, by Mark Zuckerberg, along with fellow Harvard College students and roommates Eduardo Saverin, Andrew McCollum, Dustin Moskovitz, and Chris Hughes.

So, maybe, just possibly, Facebook was merely Yet Another Social Network site that were popping up, and didn't require stolen secret CIA technology to get going. (Or, maybe it did. Hard to say.)

Certainly even the standard accounts say that Zuck wrestled control from the other creators, and there were lawsuits over that the resulted in huge settlments.

And maybe, just possibly I am (at least sometimes) one of those Freeper's who have done research aren are very well versed on the topic we're discussing.

ps Your following statement is laughable on multiple levels

“I said that professional reporters, such as those that broadcast on huge networks like Fox or Clear Channel radio have a set of standards for how they do their reporting that make it almost impossible to report on Q.”- me

No, I don't think it's laughable, I think it's correct. It's easy to say that "they all suck" about reporters, but it's not true.

I mentioned Tucker Carlson, he's an impressive reporter. I don't doubt that Tucker is quite aware of Q, maybe even following the story somewhere, but it's not reportable by him.

Just because we all detest the bias of NBC, CNN, The New York TImes and others of their ilk doesn't mean that no reporters have any standard or professional methods they are aware of and supposed to follow.

Maybe a lot of them are just ignoring them. In the S&L crisis over 1000 or of a total of 3200 S&Ls failed, most for criminal or negligent practices. It did not mean that there no bankers knew anything and the whole profession were cheats. We don't say that talking about bankers following the standards of their industry is ridiculous.

In the Enron crisis the entire accounting firm of Arther Anderson was found to be cooking the books. They were eventually disbanded as punishment. We don't say that there are no valid accounting standards.

Even if the ratio is worse than 1/3, there is still a core set of methods and practices reporters use, or should use.

Tucker's father was a reporter, and his first job out of college was working as a reporter at a journal that the Heritage Foundation published. I'm sure they worked hard to pound some good, solid journalistic practices into him.

When recently accused of fabricating the story about Tony Podesta his response was "I have two sources" -- which is a simple way of saying: I am a professional, and I'm following the accepted standards for professional reporting.

Should the Q theories prove out as so many hope then one of the outcomes I most look forward to is a revulsion at the behavior of the media, and how they have ignored their own professions rules, just like the S&L banker and accountant at Arthur Anderson.

Have a nice night, NDi

1,526 posted on 07/28/2018 6:37:11 PM PDT by Jack Black

very excellent explanation.

1,527 posted on 07/28/2018 6:39:45 PM PDT by Jack Black

TL NWR

Walls of text still don’t impress me.

1,528 posted on 07/28/2018 6:42:57 PM PDT by No_Doll_i

Don't be so sure you know what "Q wants."

I'm not, It was speculation, for the sake of discussion.

And did you really defend the media blackout of Q as a source by referencing their "all in" on deep throat as a source?

Yes, let me try again to explain my position on this:

If Q wanted to be like Deep Throat he could go to any of several dozen reporters (maybe even Woodward, who is still reporting at the Post) and say "I am Mr. Q and I work at Agency Y, and I would like to tell you things.

Then, after Woodward or whoever checked out Mr. Q (and tried fo find a second source for the most spectacular claims) you would have stories being published by Named Reporters. This happens every day in Washington, and it is simply NOT THE SAME as reporting on what a completely anonymous person on 4chan says.

Come on now, Bagster, Think logically.

1,529 posted on 07/28/2018 6:46:15 PM PDT by Jack Black

1,530 posted on 07/28/2018 6:47:10 PM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)

short, snarky, comments still don’t impress me.

not answering direct questions still doesn’t impress me.

but that’s me.

others have a different style, and value different things.
that’s what makes FR so fun
cheers

1,531 posted on 07/28/2018 6:49:31 PM PDT by Jack Black

[Oops, missed a "/" in there -- AZL]

THOSE WHO YOU TRUST THE MOST ARE THE MOST EVIL.

The Top 10 Most Trusted People in America are:

Tom Hanks
Sandra Bullock
Denzel Washington
Meryl Streep
Maya Angelou
Steven Spielberg
Bill Gates
Alex Trebek
Melinda Gates
Julia Roberts

1,532 posted on 07/28/2018 6:51:30 PM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)

Over at 8ch they are pretty sure that the ‘all caps’ thing was indeed Q yelling at them. Lot of ‘concernfagging’ going on lately there so IMHO it was warranted. The anons took it in stride and seemed to be bucking up and amping up their normal smack down of shills and pearl clutchers. I think the anons actually are doing better after Q’s woodshed event.

1,533 posted on 07/28/2018 6:54:32 PM PDT by TrueFact (Critical thinking about EVERYTHING.... tough but required.)

1,534 posted on 07/28/2018 6:55:35 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

Wasn’t there a video that Q put out about leadership with the plot of a guy dancing at a concert who finally gets someone else to dance, which starts everyone dancing?

Though I don't recall a mention by Q, the video is variously known as the "First Follower" video or "How to start a movement". See DuckDuckGo.

1,535 posted on 07/28/2018 6:55:38 PM PDT by AZLiberty ("If we believe in absurdities, we commit atrocities." -- said by Voltaire, lived by elite Libs)

Sandra B is hot. That sucks. Alex Trebek, that pisses me off. The rest? Who trusts dopes like that in the first place?

1,536 posted on 07/28/2018 6:57:07 PM PDT by xone

To: bagster; All

In light of the black eye discussion we've had, it's interesting that this photoshop was used for this article:

https://nypost.com/2018/07/28/wall-street-finally-taught-zuckerberg-the-lesson-he-deserved/

1,537 posted on 07/28/2018 6:57:23 PM PDT by generally ( Don't be stupid. We have politicians for that.)

Alex Trebek? I missed info on him. Only know him as the jeopardy guy.

1,538 posted on 07/28/2018 6:59:28 PM PDT by TianaHighrider (Speak the TRUTH and SHAME the devil! * Fight SPEECH/MIND control *)

To: edzo4; TEXOKIE; Steven W.; bagster; generally

Ya’ll go check out Matrixxx.

https://twitter.com/intheMatrixxx

1,539 posted on 07/28/2018 6:59:41 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (Freedom or Liberty? Which would you choose?)

To: edzo4; Hostage

At Mach 3, in twenty seconds, a rocket will travel 12 miles, which enough to get it out of the frame in 40 seconds. It is also certain, that this was not a single image: it was an image that represented at least several minutes of action. The author of the article happens to be an expert in time lapse photography.

I am not an expert on this. However, The Drive is a very well respected publication, and they published it live, with several updates in short order. Nothing that they wrote suggested it was a missile, and it is suspicious that the only images were from a time-lapse camera. They were also able to locate the specific helicopter at that exact location that was credited as responsible for the image.

It would be quite unimaginable that the helicopter and missile launch happened at the same time. Additionally, there are millions of people in the Greater Seattle area, some of whom were awake, and some of whom had smartphones. Yet, not a peep from anyone else, no blog posts, no articles in the local publications about this “incident” that do not reference this one picture.

Q has taught me to have a good amount of skepticism. He has mentioned the Hawaii missile, and he showed a picture of the Whidbey Island incident. However, he is not perfect. Taken together with the Drive article there is enough to convince me that the incident never occurred as you and others have portrayed it.

1,540 posted on 07/28/2018 7:02:25 PM PDT by Fractal Trader

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794