Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Was the Trump Nomination of Kavanaugh A Call To the Bullpen Move?
me

Posted on 07/10/2018 7:09:20 AM PDT by klimeckg

I read in another post with the same idea but can’t seem to find it. The thought process was that Trumps nomination of Kavanaugh was a chess move.

I liken it to a baseball manager making a call to the bullpen to get the other teams manager to also make a move with a batter.

So, is Kavanaugh a decoy? Trumps knows what will happen with the Senate and will let it play out and then nominate who he really wants?

Just wondering what other Freepes think.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat; Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last
To: klimeckg

The fact that McCain supports this pick troubles me the most.


21 posted on 07/10/2018 7:25:29 AM PDT by Responsibility2nd (Roy Moore for the Supreme Court of the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

I think Trump went for the one he is most sure gets through. The McCain message this morning was the confirmation of his decision. He can abide by a vote against by Paul but he could not sustain were two to defect like the commie from Maine and the Cow from Al. The extra bennie is those in the red states who are close to losing could lose their seats which would increase the advantage to something like 54 46 which would make Trump’s next pick invulnerable. So, the analogy to baseball is correct, just the wrong one. This is putting someone on base so your home run hitter can bring them around.


22 posted on 07/10/2018 7:25:35 AM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy
I agree with some other editorials on this. If Trump gets Kavanaugh, great, if the Democrats are able to scuttle him, then Trump puts in a woman and makes all of them eat dirt voting against a woman.

I agree. It's a good move. While I'm not 100% sure of his abortion stance, he so far, appears better than Kennedy.

If they scuttle him, congress gets a less palatable choice and they're cornered on the women issue.
23 posted on 07/10/2018 7:25:49 AM PDT by TexasGunLover
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: The Sons of Liberty

I think Kavanaugh was a brilliant choice. I’m thrilled to have someone of his intellectual quality and depth on the court. It needs history and clean thinking, and he’ll be a pwoerhouse in the long run.


24 posted on 07/10/2018 7:26:34 AM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

Yes it is troubling but what is the alternative?? Go for someone that at least two GOPers will vote against?


25 posted on 07/10/2018 7:27:50 AM PDT by Mouton (The media is the enemy of the people.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

Occam’s razor.

I think he chose Kavanaugh.


26 posted on 07/10/2018 7:28:40 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starboard

I’m not going to hope for another persons demise, but isn’t it ironic that Kavanaugh will be torn apart in an attempt to find political bias, yet here sits Ruth Buzzie Ginsburg, 85 years old, refusing to retire and take her chances on dying in office just to deny someone like Trump the opportunity to appoint her successor. We’ll take those odds.

But it is the most transparently political decision a SCOTUS justice can possibly render.

You’re right, she should have done it when Obama would have made the appointment. Now she’s running against the clock.


27 posted on 07/10/2018 7:30:36 AM PDT by bigbob (Trust Sessions. Trust the Plan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

Who cares?

This is Trump’s pick. It is from the list he ran with. It’s a good pick. All the Mike Lee fan boys need to stop being girly.


28 posted on 07/10/2018 7:30:48 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

Or not. Why do you think we are going to lose the senate??


29 posted on 07/10/2018 7:31:51 AM PDT by Nifster (I see puppy dogs in the clouds)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

Uncle Bill said it was gonna be me, but my girl lost.

30 posted on 07/10/2018 7:36:16 AM PDT by Dogbert41 (When the strong man, fully armed, guards his own dwelling, his goods are safe. -Luke 11:21y)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bigbob

She wanted Hillry to replace her. Because they are all about their V-words.


31 posted on 07/10/2018 7:36:44 AM PDT by petitfour (APPEAL TO HEAVEN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wbarmy

A whole lot of people have gone broke both financially and politically trying to outsmart the Donald. He is truly a chessmaster.


32 posted on 07/10/2018 7:37:06 AM PDT by Don Corleone (Nothing makes the delusional more furious than truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Nifster

>>Or not. Why do you think we are going to lose the senate??<<

I don’t. But that isn’t the way to plan.

I do a lot of project planning and the one fundamental planning tenet is the importance of the project item dictates how you should assess the probability of the predecessors. This one is critical so the plan should be for the almost worst case scenario.

The worst case scenario is, of course, that we have traitors in the Senate. But there is no plan that can deal with that contingency.


33 posted on 07/10/2018 7:37:13 AM PDT by freedumb2003 ("please pass the winnamins" (/Principled on 6/27/2018))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

No, stupid theory.


34 posted on 07/10/2018 7:37:29 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

No, he doesn’t have time before the midterms to get a replacement in. But if they turn Kavanaugh down, and if the Senate gains Republicans, then they will get a replacement even better. If the Republicans lose the Senate, the situation will be very bad. The seat may sit empty for 2 more years.


35 posted on 07/10/2018 7:38:20 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TexasGunLover

There is way too much political theater in the ideological/gender make up of the court. Should Roe come before the court the optics will see the female jurists defending women’s rights. The court would benefit from a jurist who represents American women who are originalists and pro-life - in my experience, a majority. Hopefully next pick.


36 posted on 07/10/2018 7:39:35 AM PDT by Ouchthatonehurt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

Honestly, I think the chance of Kavanaugh not getting confirmed is less than 5%, and here I’m being generous.

Donnelly, Heitkamp, Machin, McCaskil, and Nelson... One or two of these democrats will vote yes to confirm.

Murkowski and Collins will also vote yes. Since McCain likes him, Flake also votes yes.

Final vote: 53 Aye, 47 Nay.


37 posted on 07/10/2018 7:39:49 AM PDT by Alas Babylon! (MAGAMarchOnWashington.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Kavenaugh will JUST squeak through before the 2018 midterms assuming the traitorcrats do every procedural move to slow things down.

And Expose the DummycRATS for who they are in November!

38 posted on 07/10/2018 7:40:25 AM PDT by CptnObvious (uestion her now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: klimeckg

I think Kavanaugh is his pick. The bullpen will be called if Kavanaugh isn’t confirmed.

Trump wouldn’t play games with Brett’s family like that. He’s smart, but he’s not callous.


39 posted on 07/10/2018 7:40:58 AM PDT by Not A Snowbird (I work for DHS. Not ashamed of it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defiant

Just to add to my last post:

So, people like Collins and Murkowski may understand that logic. If they turn Kavanaugh down, they end up with either Barratt, who they like even less; or with a situation where the seat sits empty. Trump will not pick a Souter just to get him through the Senate.

By October, it will probably be evident that the Republicans will gain seats in the Senate, and the holdouts will come along.


40 posted on 07/10/2018 7:41:50 AM PDT by Defiant (I may be deplorable, but I'm not getting in that basket.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-94 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson