Posted on 07/03/2018 11:30:25 AM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
Truly a depiction of the Deep State Threat if true,...
(Excerpt) Read more at youtu.be ...
it didn’t happen
i didn’t see it happen
it doesn’t matter it happened
LOL, keep trying troll
I seen the anon post where is this q post you speak of?
if you cant answer just use more lame ad hominem and nicknames..
“I seen the anon post where is this q post you speak of?”
Just because you don’t want to admit it’s a Q post doesn’t mean it isn’t a Q post. Sorry, but that dog won’t hunt. It’s confirmed as coming from his account on 4chan. That’s why that post is in with all the other Q posts in the archives.
If you knew how 4chan worked, you wouldn’t even be bothering to make this pathetic attempt at obfuscation.
over an hour and that’s all you got? Pathetic..
try harder
it didn’t happen
I didn’t see it happen
it doesn’t matter that it happened
hhhmmm, that’s weird how did Q know about ‘sealed indictments outside of DC’ in November, 4 months before Sessions announced Huber was working in UTAH in March?
Nov 14 2017 12:51:10 (EST)
Nothing is as it appears.
What was the DC vote breakdown between Trump & Clinton?
What is the nickname for DC?
Why would sealed indictments be outside of DC jurisdiction?
What purpose would this serve?
Why are judicial appointments being rapidly completed?
Who can you trust?
Have faith, Patriots.
Q
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/29/politics/who-is-john-huber/index.html
Utah US attorney John Huber was revealed Thursday as the person Attorney General Jeff Sessions tasked with looking into Republican claims of FBI misconduct and whether more should have been done to investigate Hillary Clinton’s ties to a Russian nuclear agency.
Huber, who has served in both Democratic and Republican administrations as a career prosecutor, nearly had his tenure as US attorney cut short last year. In March 2017, shortly after he took charge of the Justice Department, Sessions asked for the resignations of 46 US attorneys who were previous administration holdovers.
BTW its a rhetorical question, so I don’t really need a pathetic ad hominem response but i’ll check back for one anyways in an hour or so...
In regards to Podesta:
The Podesta Group was indicted and John Podesta was also indicted for his Russia dealings. Regardless of his infrequent appearances and opinion pieces, as defiant as he may appear, he is like Comey, under close watch.
https://twitter.com/prayingmedic/status/1008853297229283328?lang=en
In regards to Abedin:
She was caught forwarding TS info to her personal Yahoo email.
Unsealed documents detail tactics in Clinton email probe (6/30/2018, 5 days ago)
https://www.politico.com/blogs/under-the-radar
and she was named in a sealed search and seizure warrant
https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000164-2f53-d8b4-aff7-ef5fea910000
This warrant was unsealed as part of a limited release in May of this year by the DOJ IG in preparation for Congressional reviews.
The timeline supports that the Q group knew this information beforehand which lends veracity to Q.
My time is limited but I suggest you revisit your prior conclusions in toto.
“In regards to Podesta:
The Podesta Group was indicted and John Podesta was also indicted for his Russia dealings.”
Yet Q predicted an arrest announcement, which did not happen.
“In regards to Abedin:
She was caught forwarding TS info to her personal Yahoo email.”
Again, Q predicted an arrest announcement which did not happen.
“The timeline supports that the Q group knew this information beforehand which lends veracity to Q.”
No, it supports that Q predicted things that never happened, including quite a few other things like riots, mass arrests, martial law, use of the emergency broadcast system, etc. Failed predictions don’t really lend veracity to Q, quite the opposite.
Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.
Q mentioned arrests in other contexts but not specific to any individual. There have been arrests and will be many more.
Drudge reported 1000 arrests in Jan 2018 ad these were linked by some reputable Anons as part of Q’s predictions.
https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/948928944723582978
There is a cast of carnival barkers that drape themselves as Q agents. They are not. Such persons put out a lot of garbage about Q and some viewers/listeners misconstrue such false attributions to Q. You may have been reading a false Q derivative.
Here is a false Q example put out by persons that seem to fit your category:
https://twitter.com/qanon76/status/990117559746924544?lang=en
That’s all I have time for now. It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud. The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.
“Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.”
Actually, yes, he predicted an arrest, publicly announced, and even the specific day it would happen, for both Podesta and Abedin. I posted a screenshot and link to it upthread.
“You may have been reading a false Q derivative.”
Nope, this was a post from Q on his original 4chan account, and all the 4chan posts can be verified as being his because 4chan posts carrying a unique identifier that is specific to each poster.
“It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud.”
Already done that, it’s posted upthread.
“The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.”
Q made multiple concrete false predictions that never happenned. He’s a fraud, and a liar. Sorry, I am not a prosecutor, I don’t need to prove his “intent”. If he takes issue with my characterization, let him sue me.
Don’t you get it?
Q is a secret. Q knows everything. Q gives you riddles to solve. Q is flying under the RADAR and FReepers have found his mode 4.
Good Luck! :^)
speaking of frauds and liars welcome back, I see you still haven’t answered how Q knew about indictments outside DC 4 moths before Sessions announced it.
I feel bad for you your like the stupid kid in math class that doesn’t get algebra so they lash out all all the other students,
it’s kind of sad, so desperate, but at least the New York Times And Washington post agree with you and i’ve seen at least one other example of a freeper being in complete agreement with the new york times...
“I see you still haven’t answered how Q knew about indictments outside DC 4 moths before Sessions announced it.”
What indictments?? Q predicted arrests. Public arrests, not secret arrests. Arrests that never happened.
So how did Q know about arrests that never happened? Because he invented them, in his imagination, because he’s a fraud and a liar.
Yes, we’ll tell you,(On the link) but only after an hour of verbiage with a British accent. F-U! Give the upshot right here, right now.
That’s why I don’t read these retarded Q Anon threads. Always talking about gardening or some other inane topic.
So WHAT happened to this plane mishap that I’ve never even heard of?
The only ‘screenshot’ you posted on this thread was #120:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3668122/posts?page=120#120
That is not a genuine Q post.
Boogieman, do you have a problem with lying? Are you being treated for pathological lying?
so you’re going with Q only made one post and they lied
and you ignore the other 1600 posts, ok troll
trolls and the MSM agree...
I encourage everyone else to read Q and draw their own conclusions
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/03/31/the-conspiracy-theory-behind-a-curious-roseanne-barr-tweet-explained/?utm_term=.44a67b3d3e57
http://nymag.com/selectall/2017/12/qanon-4chan-the-storm-conspiracy-explained.html
https://harpers.org/archive/2018/06/the-wizard-of-q/
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/06/opinion/qanon-trump-conspiracy-theory.html
https://www.seattletimes.com/opinion/the-conspiracy-theory-that-says-trump-is-a-genius/
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/conspiracy-theory-donald-trump-genius-hilary-clinton-roseanne-barr-barack-obama-george-soros-america-a8293806.html
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/2018/04/06/the_conspiracy_theory_that_says_trump_is_a_genius_439119.html
http://metro.co.uk/2018/04/09/people-claiming-trump-secret-genius-pretending-collude-russians-7452136/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/03/31/the-conspiracy-theory-behind-a-curious-roseanne-barr-tweet-explained/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.0a5319532879
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/plum-line/wp/2018/04/09/the-crisis-in-journalism-thats-helping-trump/?utm_term=.b303dbe749fd
http://www.newsweek.com/how-storm-biggest-fake-news-story-796725
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kSAxcQ5VL5c
https://www.cnn.com/2018/03/31/politics/roseanne-barr-conspiracy-tweets/index.html
https://thinkprogress.org/rosanne-barr-promotes-pro-trump-conspiracy-theory-d52a65887183/
http://www.newsweek.com/roseanne-barr-tweets-about-right-wing-qanon-conspiracy-theory-867983
https://www.buzzfeed.com/juliareinstein/roseanne-qanon-explainer?utm_term=.kkxvYjNeP#.nqg3P8mw7
https://medium.com/@willsommer/roseanne-barr-is-tweeting-about-qanon-a-new-pizzagate-style-conspiracy-theory-234526f52e54
http://thehill.com/homenews/media/381123-roseanne-barr-faces-social-media-backlash-over-trump-conspiracy-theory-tweet
https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/roseanne-president-trump-has-freed-children-pimps-all-world-1098812
Coordinated?
All For A LARP?
[ATTACKS WILL ONLY INTENSIFY]
Ask yourself, WHY?
Q
oh no a typo, you got me, the troll ranks must be growing pretty thin
“That is not a genuine Q post.”
Yes it is. It is from his original account on 4chan, and it is verifiably from him because it has the same hash as all his other 4chan posts. I actually viewed this post on 4chan back when it was made, it is from him.
“so you’re going with Q only made one post and they lied”
Q made plenty of posts, but it only takes this one to really show how much of a fraud and a liar he is, since he managed to pack so much fail into a single post right there.
Uh no. Nice try though.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.