Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.
Q mentioned arrests in other contexts but not specific to any individual. There have been arrests and will be many more.
Drudge reported 1000 arrests in Jan 2018 ad these were linked by some reputable Anons as part of Q’s predictions.
https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/948928944723582978
There is a cast of carnival barkers that drape themselves as Q agents. They are not. Such persons put out a lot of garbage about Q and some viewers/listeners misconstrue such false attributions to Q. You may have been reading a false Q derivative.
Here is a false Q example put out by persons that seem to fit your category:
https://twitter.com/qanon76/status/990117559746924544?lang=en
That’s all I have time for now. It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud. The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.
“Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.”
Actually, yes, he predicted an arrest, publicly announced, and even the specific day it would happen, for both Podesta and Abedin. I posted a screenshot and link to it upthread.
“You may have been reading a false Q derivative.”
Nope, this was a post from Q on his original 4chan account, and all the 4chan posts can be verified as being his because 4chan posts carrying a unique identifier that is specific to each poster.
“It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud.”
Already done that, it’s posted upthread.
“The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.”
Q made multiple concrete false predictions that never happenned. He’s a fraud, and a liar. Sorry, I am not a prosecutor, I don’t need to prove his “intent”. If he takes issue with my characterization, let him sue me.