“Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.”
Actually, yes, he predicted an arrest, publicly announced, and even the specific day it would happen, for both Podesta and Abedin. I posted a screenshot and link to it upthread.
“You may have been reading a false Q derivative.”
Nope, this was a post from Q on his original 4chan account, and all the 4chan posts can be verified as being his because 4chan posts carrying a unique identifier that is specific to each poster.
“It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud.”
Already done that, it’s posted upthread.
“The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.”
Q made multiple concrete false predictions that never happenned. He’s a fraud, and a liar. Sorry, I am not a prosecutor, I don’t need to prove his “intent”. If he takes issue with my characterization, let him sue me.
Don’t you get it?
Q is a secret. Q knows everything. Q gives you riddles to solve. Q is flying under the RADAR and FReepers have found his mode 4.
Good Luck! :^)
speaking of frauds and liars welcome back, I see you still haven’t answered how Q knew about indictments outside DC 4 moths before Sessions announced it.
I feel bad for you your like the stupid kid in math class that doesn’t get algebra so they lash out all all the other students,
it’s kind of sad, so desperate, but at least the New York Times And Washington post agree with you and i’ve seen at least one other example of a freeper being in complete agreement with the new york times...
The only ‘screenshot’ you posted on this thread was #120:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3668122/posts?page=120#120
That is not a genuine Q post.
Boogieman, do you have a problem with lying? Are you being treated for pathological lying?