Replies

“In regards to Podesta:
The Podesta Group was indicted and John Podesta was also indicted for his Russia dealings.”

Yet Q predicted an arrest announcement, which did not happen.

“In regards to Abedin:
She was caught forwarding TS info to her personal Yahoo email.”

Again, Q predicted an arrest announcement which did not happen.

“The timeline supports that the Q group knew this information beforehand which lends veracity to Q.”

No, it supports that Q predicted things that never happened, including quite a few other things like riots, mass arrests, martial law, use of the emergency broadcast system, etc. Failed predictions don’t really lend veracity to Q, quite the opposite.

Q did not predict a specific ‘arrest’ of Podesta. Q wrote ‘indicted’ presumably a sealed indictment.

Q mentioned arrests in other contexts but not specific to any individual. There have been arrests and will be many more.

Drudge reported 1000 arrests in Jan 2018 ad these were linked by some reputable Anons as part of Q’s predictions.
https://twitter.com/DRUDGE_REPORT/status/948928944723582978

There is a cast of carnival barkers that drape themselves as Q agents. They are not. Such persons put out a lot of garbage about Q and some viewers/listeners misconstrue such false attributions to Q. You may have been reading a false Q derivative.

Here is a false Q example put out by persons that seem to fit your category:
https://twitter.com/qanon76/status/990117559746924544?lang=en

That’s all I have time for now. It’s your turn to go get genuine specific Q drops and connect the dots to specific events showing Q is a fraud. The term ‘fraud’ means with ‘intent’, not in terms of changes made to adjust a plan.

Q predicted things that never happened, including quite a few other things like riots, mass arrests, martial law

Read the latest Q post dated July 4. Q addresses tht. I'd post but I don't do graphics. Here's a link....

Ex: US, ML, NG(1) False. SA True.

I speak Q, let me decipher.

(example, United States Martial Law National Guard (first post or maybe more to come?) was disinformation. Saudi Arabia drops were true.

Of course we all know how Saudi Arabia turned out, if you'd like to debunk Q on that score. Give it a shot.

And please try to use your brain and THINK about why Q would say Hillary and Podesta were going to be arrested and about marial law. THINK THINK THINK.

This not a game. Stop thinking simply.

Expand your thinking.

Bagster