Posted on 06/11/2018 12:11:22 AM PDT by ransomnote
This excellent photo was taken by Jesco Denzel, a German government photographer.
This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.
If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".
Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"
First post to Q ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it
You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.
If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs
A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos
Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge
Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub
Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index
Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:
SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163
Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon
For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected
If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump
While pretending you are being honest and sincerely skeptical.
Keep plucking those chickens.
There are so many people conspiring with so many other people right now it’s hard to keep them all straight.
ANYTHING is possible at this time. Now we wait to see what falls out of which tree.
Q: We have everything, now comes the pain!
The 'p' missing means someone took a pee. Like the trolls are trying to do all over this thread. :-D
I think you picked up a lil Hillary along the way!
And yet he persists. Seems you are waiting for someone to come and take you by the hand to a secret location and show you the plan.
You like Q, you dont like Q, Im getting dizzy trying to follow all your posts.
OK so let me get this straight, while we are here TRYING to discuss 20+ Q drops, you are here with your stupid longass post trying to convince anyone who will listen that you are relevant.
I guess you are not getting the memo, MOST OF US DO NOT CARE WHAT YOU HAVE TO SAY ANYMORE.
Got it? Good.....
Now I'm the "resident guru of Q?" I detect a bit of attitude, Jack. You do know I took the name Lesser Oracle because it was given to me by another anti-Q troll in the same manner you just called me the Guru of Q. Or maybe you didn't know that.
Also, me saying Q was "pointing at" something is not the same as Q "predicting" something. Like you say, just about all dates and predictions are interpretations based on "pointings." Like I said, the 11th was interpreted as significant because of the OIG report being released. Then after that changed, like the anon says, some gave it new significance because of Assange.
People like you then grab onto those dates and when nothing earth shattering happens, use it to debunk Q, as if HE said something specific would happen on a specific date.
I'm glad you have reverted to Q debunker rather than pretending to contribute. That game was pretty transparent, given your history, I have to say. And those obnoxious html tables of yours, goot lawd. Have we seen the last of them at least?
I wonder if I should name myself the "Resident Guru of Q" or not. Hmmmm
Bagster
How about the “Wizard of Q”?
Resident Quru should cover it.
Oh, derp. I shoulda figured that one out. ThankQ Miss blu.
Bagster
I miss the easy ones. :(
Bagster
Well the F-23 was a Northrop Grumman fighter called the Black Widow which supposedly never moved forward losing out to the F-22. Might have been compromised or so good it was kept under wraps. Two protos built for the testing (Black Widow II and Grey Ghost). Supposedly really stealthy.
Then of course there is the MIG-23 Flogger which is kinda dated.
Was looking for an experimental X-23 of some type but couldn’t find anything.
Can’t think of any ships/missles/torpedoes/etc that have -23
Maybe a rocket - anyone know?
Where is [RR]?
What country specifically?
Why?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
CANADA
Deputy Attorney General Rod J. Rosenstein Delivers Remarks at the International Economic Forum of the Americas Conference of Montreal
Montreal,
Canada
~ Monday, June 11, 2018
Haha. Good find.
You weaponized autist, you.
Bagster
Oh Mr Wizard, can you please ask Q to take a break for an hour so I can shower and make myself some dinner?
ME: (now) This was a general statement about the nature of true belief. I do feel that examples, like the one I gave of the failed prophecies of various 19th century preachers, are apropos. Sorry if that cuts a little too close to the bone for comfort, Bagster.
BAGSTER: (in italics) Cause we're ignorant sheep and cultists Jack?
I don't say that. Right now I think the most rational position is waiting. Only time will tell if people's faith in Q was misplaced or not. But even if Q is debunked in some sort of comprehensive way, I am sure that some people will keep on believing. People here have admitted that this is a religious belief for them.
Not enlightened beings like you, Jack?
Ha, ha, ha, ha ha. Look in the mirror, Bagster. You are the one who claimed to be "the lesser oracle", not me. You are the one who bragged only a few posts ago that "My powers are vast and beyond your comprehension. :) (OK, I note the smiley face, so I will take it as sarcastic --in part.)
Of course I don't claim to have any special knowledge! That's the entire theme of my writing on these threads.
Have you come among us to show us the way, Jack?
Hardly. In fact I've asked a you, as my main protagonist here, a few simple questions. I posted them on the previous thread, and I posted them on this thread. But still, no answers.
That is, of course, your choice. You are under no obligation to do so. However it does not bode well for your sincerity. You prefer to toss out rude littel asides and you keep on with ad-hominum attacks. In a formal debate, points are deducted for attacking the speaker and not the topic. This isn't a formal debate, I realize, but I try to maintain my principles.
A review of the last 50 or so posts will show that I take considerable time to answer any question or criticism sincrely put forward to me. For the most part I try to ignore mere insults, but on occasion I have fallen short of my goals on that.
My next set of questions will be addressed to the thread at large.
Perhaps there are others who are pilgrims on the journey who will take a sincere interest in communicating in good-faith about the questions which seem self-evident to me, and not just smashing me around for not being a part of the in-group of true believers.
Postscript: Someone did say: see what happens if Q is injected in a non-Q thread. I did see some quite rude responses on a non-Q thread to someone posting stuff, when I went to look.
So, the problem goes both ways.
I am trying to act a bridge, not a roadblock, to understanding. Starting with MY OWN.
Cheers!
QOVFEFE™
Can anyone find out the date of the Seth Rich picture from the metadata?
Yeah he is hanging out with Lynn Rothschild up there today, she was the chair of that forum.... go figure....
QOVFEFE™
QOVFEFE™
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.