Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q Anon: FRiendly FReeper Collaboration to understand Q drops
qanon.pub ^ | 6/11/2018 | FReepers, vanity

Posted on 06/11/2018 12:11:22 AM PDT by ransomnote

This excellent photo was taken by Jesco Denzel, a German government photographer.

This thread is a friendly collaborative place for FReepers to analyze information and share opinons. FReepers have a wide variety of reasons for investigating Q Anon content; this is not the appropriate place to criticize or badger those who choose to use some of their time in this manner.

If you are new to Q Anon, the three links below provide overviews to help answer the questions, "Who is Q?" and "Why read Q drops?".

Is Trump Staging a Counter-Coup? [Q explained?]>
Note: The above thread has been locked for disruptive comments, but post #1 includes a strong, concise Who/What/Where overview.

Q Anon: A Freeper's post re the "new Parallel Construct that Trump has created"

First post to “Q” ping list. Please read and let me know if you want off or on it

You can locate Q Anon threads by searching the key word "Qanon" using the search window in the upper right of Free Republic's forum page.

If you haven't seen it yet, President John F. Kennedy's excellent speech regarding secret societies, as well as comments about the press, is located at the following link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zdMbmdFOvTs

A helpful FReeper passed along the following Youtube link to a good source for concise reviewes of Q drops, Praying Medic:
https://www.youtube.com/user/prayingmedic/videos

Praying Medic also has a a Twitter account:
https://anonsw.github.io/qtmerge

Q "drops" (i.e., posts) can be read with their original formatting on various websites. Sometimes the Q drop websites come under cyber attack or stop updating. This week, I've been using the following link:
https://qanon.pub

Q drops (i.e., posts) often use unfamiliar acronyms. Swordmaker maintains a list of acronymsto help FReepers understand Q drop text. The master list of acronyms is stored on Swordmaker's profile page. It's really great to have a convenient place to find definitions and explanations of terms used in the drops. Here is the link:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~swordmaker/index

Within our threads, Swordmaker posts updates featuring the latest terms added to the lexicon - you can find his updates on threads by looking for this silver Q graphic:

SkyPilot has been collecting Q Anon information into one interesting, detailed, "story of Q" post which I'll place here:
https://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/3633313/posts?page=163#163

Here's a handy link for those who would like to read what people on Twitter are Tweeting about Q Anon:
Click to read what Tweeters are saying about Q Anon

For those who want a little uplifting video which outlines the big picture that we are now striving for, here's a video from 2016 in which candidate Donald Trump outlines what he wants for Americans and America and his promises if elected.
This Video Will Get Donald Trump Elected



If you'd like to communicate your support for President Trump's efforts to "red-pill" Americans, you may want to use the link Hoosiermama posted which provides you with and email page - you can send the president an email. Here's the link:
Email support for President Trump



TOPICS: Conspiracy; Miscellaneous
KEYWORDS: q; qanon; qidiots; qis8chananon; qislarp; qisyoutubers; qtarded
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,761-1,765 next last
To: ransomnote

Does a false swatting count as a FF?

UPDATE: ALL CLEAR–Police Respond to Report of Active Shooter at the Justice Department; DOJ Swatted?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2018/06/police-respond-to-report-of-active-shooter-at-the-justice-department-in-washington-d-c/


461 posted on 06/11/2018 3:12:59 PM PDT by mairdie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Snowybear

two new ones pics of Julian Assange and Seth Rich

What recent news came out re: SR/JA/WL lawsuit?
Back in the news.
The ‘server’ brings down the house.
Q


462 posted on 06/11/2018 3:13:26 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 455 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
indicating he would plan on responding during the previously scheduled briefing on Thursday

Weasel words.

463 posted on 06/11/2018 3:14:04 PM PDT by pa_dweller (When we're truly living in 'Idiocracy' will we know it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

UK/SIS
WH/C_A/FBI/DOJ
Joint-Treason.

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

This makes it sound like there is also treason against the U.K.

What could that be about?

We got rid of our traitor in the WH; but, the U.K. is still suffering from its globalist occupation.

Could this be about the Obama WH/CIA/5-Eyes conspiring against BREXIT?


464 posted on 06/11/2018 3:14:21 PM PDT by Disestablishmentarian (Read "American Betrayal" by Diana West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: SkyPilot

Wasn’t the drop implication that it was the week in general?


465 posted on 06/11/2018 3:16:03 PM PDT by Axenolith (No signed paper can hold the iron...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 322 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

Woa...


466 posted on 06/11/2018 3:17:34 PM PDT by Axenolith (No signed paper can hold the iron...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
On twitter. Apologies if already posted. Democrat in Missouri.
467 posted on 06/11/2018 3:17:35 PM PDT by Cats Pajamas (GO OGLE ogle - stare at in a lecherous manner.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i; Jack Black
Those with an agenda to discredit are pushing false information.
They (you) will fail.
Learn.
Use logic.

Proof that Q reads this thread. He's talking directly to YOU, Jack Black.

Q sees all.

Bagster

468 posted on 06/11/2018 3:17:56 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 439 | View Replies]

To: bagster

> Hitler/Merkel

The resemblance is pretty startling.


469 posted on 06/11/2018 3:22:31 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 460 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i

I may have figured something out with respect to the NK deal.

NK was selling nukes to keep the doors open. He was even willing to sell them to the US to keep them out of people’s hands.

What if China was told that economic expansion into the NK would be exclusively Chinese - pauses the wage pressure they are seeing in China of late (capacity too!)

NK would work at what would previously had been Chinese level wages for ten years or so whilst their economy came online. They remain an economic and defense client of China, but would spend zero in terms of upkeep and defense. NK would be a Chinese authored economic miracle.


470 posted on 06/11/2018 3:23:08 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: RinaseaofDs

Q


471 posted on 06/11/2018 3:24:07 PM PDT by Yulee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 470 | View Replies]

To: bagster

This would apply to the twitter douche who posted this the other night and removed their account:

BackChannel17:

“HOSTAGE NO MORE. It Is Time To Exit The Rabbit Hole. It Has Been A Pleasure. Look forward to your news today(tomorrow stateside). I WILL be there. Truth Rises, and Wonderland Falls. 6/11 JA “


472 posted on 06/11/2018 3:25:17 PM PDT by Snowybear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 468 | View Replies]

To: barbarianbabs

I consider that a high probability for Cobain and Hutchins too...


473 posted on 06/11/2018 3:26:32 PM PDT by Axenolith (No signed paper can hold the iron...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: edzo4
You seem to have ignored my previous post to you, #393. That's unfortunate, because you keep accusing me of saying something I didn't say.

And, that's unfortunate because I do say enough controversial here, on my own, to already have irritated some people, though that is not my intention.

But it's not OK to ascribe everything that anyone says that you perceive as "anti Q" to me.

So, I will try again and make it crystal clear for you.

The following post is by SkyPilot, not me. I responded to it saying, that I was not aware of anything happening today, but the OIG report (due Thursday) should be fun. Here is SKYPILOT's original post: #322.

It is 3:00 pm EST. What was the “earth shattering” release that we were told would happen today (6\11)? Spaceshot says it was so big he was going to take today off from work and watch the news.

I haven’t seen anything on Drudge (other than Singapore summit, which is not “earth shattering.”)

Some one please help me out here.

322 posted on 6/11/2018, 12:00:43 PM by SkyPilot

Separate question: How do you authenticate Q postings?

Hopefully you can understand that a simple blot of text like:

When did we mention/emphasize the 11th?
Those with an agenda to discredit are pushing false information.
They (you) will fail.
Learn.
Use logic.
Q

..isn't self verifying. Anyone can sign something Q.

This is one reason I always use the term "Q and his interpreters". Because Q speaks mostly with his famous "Socratic questions" method, and occasional jpegs. So to get what it means lots of interpretation is needed. (I have noticed he's slightly less enigmatic than he used to be.

And it's also assuming you feel you can somehow authenticate him as the "True Q", an anonymous poster who has moved from chat board to chat board, all of which are primarily designed to facilitate anonymous chat.

And, as with anything humans interpret, interpretations are different.

I don't think that SkyPilot told us where he heard that, or the intepretation of that. But I take him at his word, and the Q quote you include indicates it was a widespread belief, so widespread that Q apparently felt the need to publicly respond to it.

But even our own resident Guru of Q, Bagster, seems to acknowledge that there was such a prediction. In post #454 he says (AND I QUOTE:)

p.p.p.s. Skypilot. I was always under the impression that 6-11 (the latest original IG release date) was what Q was pointing at as BOOM-worthy. That date has been changed. The only other thing of significance I've seen anybody saying might happen today was in regards to Assange.

454 posted on 6/11/2018, 2:54:56 PM by bagster

So, apparently there was some expectation of something to do by a number of Q followers. Not by me, I didn't know about it. But by SkyPilot and Bagster, at least, but probably others. Including the person/poster that Q is dressing down in the unauthenticated message you included.

Maybe it was all a big misunderstanding, based on a false Q postings. Or maybe, as Bagster suggests that referred to the OIG report (although why Q would be telling us about the OIG report when the OIG does so himself is a mystery).

Feel free to respond to my actual postings anytime. I do have a lot of sincere questions.

474 posted on 06/11/2018 3:27:11 PM PDT by Jack Black (Redemption of our fallen Republic requires blood atonement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 437 | View Replies]

To: mairdie

I think it was an FFF - False false flag.


475 posted on 06/11/2018 3:27:35 PM PDT by meyer (The Constitution says what it says, and it doesn't say what it doesn't say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 461 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
What else might (23) refer to?
Dash v Minus?
Military.

It took me a minute to figure out what the hell 23 was. It's right after the "NowC@mesTHEP@in-23!!!" from the graphic in the Q post dated 5-19-18.

I think it's meant to be a minus, but that's just my best guess. A date? Some type of countdown? Any military ideas?

It's a puzzlement.

Bagster

476 posted on 06/11/2018 3:29:16 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 453 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
NEW Q

#1463

Anonymous ID: 17fc97 #1704039📁


Jun 11 2018 16:51:46 (EST)

seth_rich_cover.582cd87e07107.jpg

>>1704013

Q !CbboFOtcZs ID: 22318c #1704083📁


Jun 11 2018 16:53:30 (EST)

>>1704039
Patriot.
Q

______________________________________________________

477 posted on 06/11/2018 3:30:13 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: Jack Black

you’re wrong, I didn’t ignore that post i’m ignoring this post...


478 posted on 06/11/2018 3:32:12 PM PDT by edzo4 ("Well I truly would be thrilled if all/most of the Q stuff turns out to be real")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 474 | View Replies]

To: No_Doll_i
Technically US 11th = SING 12th, correct?

What is SING 12. I wanna say it's a day ahead in North Korea. Does SING somehow mean another part of the world in the day ahead time zone?

Bagster

479 posted on 06/11/2018 3:32:30 PM PDT by bagster ("Even bad men love their mamas.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 458 | View Replies]

To: bagster

LoL you asking me???? right now I am just trying to keep up with posting, barely had time to read everything yet, let alone see what the anons are sayin.

555


480 posted on 06/11/2018 3:32:39 PM PDT by No_Doll_i
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 476 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 441-460461-480481-500 ... 1,761-1,765 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson