[bagster]

But even our own resident Guru of Q, Bagster, seems to acknowledge that there was such a prediction. In post #454 he says (AND I QUOTE:)

Now I'm the "resident guru of Q?" I detect a bit of attitude, Jack. You do know I took the name Lesser Oracle because it was given to me by another anti-Q troll in the same manner you just called me the Guru of Q. Or maybe you didn't know that.

Also, me saying Q was "pointing at" something is not the same as Q "predicting" something. Like you say, just about all dates and predictions are interpretations based on "pointings." Like I said, the 11th was interpreted as significant because of the OIG report being released. Then after that changed, like the anon says, some gave it new significance because of Assange.

People like you then grab onto those dates and when nothing earth shattering happens, use it to debunk Q, as if HE said something specific would happen on a specific date.

I'm glad you have reverted to Q debunker rather than pretending to contribute. That game was pretty transparent, given your history, I have to say. And those obnoxious html tables of yours, goot lawd. Have we seen the last of them at least?

I wonder if I should name myself the "Resident Guru of Q" or not. Hmmmm…

Bagster

[Publius]

How about the “Wizard of Q”?

[CJ Wolf]

Resident Quru should cover it.

[Jack Black]

I wonder if I should name myself the "Resident Guru of Q" or not. Hmmmm…

You should. It's a nice sequel to your previous title. Which was, apparently, also bestowed by a fellow Freeper.

Enjoy!

[Axenolith]

Bag, of Q. Kinda has that Den, of Earth ring to it ;-)

[lighthouse]

It was EyeintheSky that kept hyping 6/11, not Q.