Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is there a Planet X, a ‘massive perturber,’ hidden beyond Pluto?
Washington Post ^ | September 3 | Joel Achenbach

Posted on 09/05/2015 7:46:28 PM PDT by BenLurkin

The paper ... noted that a number of large, very remote objects share a similar orbital angle. That's suspicious if you're an astronomer expecting to see a random distribution of objects.

The key orbital feature is known, rather obtusely, as the “argument of perihelion.” We're not shy of complicated orbital concepts (we try to toss around the phrase "obliquity of the ecliptic" whenever possible), but this one is not very easy to explain. "The argument of perihelion is the angle at which an object comes to perihelion with respect to the ecliptic plane," Sheppard said in an e-mail. Mike Brown, the Caltech astronomer who discovered the dwarf planet Eris, tells us by e-mail, "Scott's claim is that all of these objects come to perihelion at the ecliptic, and all are going from below the plane to above the plane at perihelion."

So there's something seemingly non-random, indeed a striking pattern, in how these extremely distant objects move around the sun. And that suggests that there's something out there influencing them -- or, more precisely, making other types of orbits unstable.

Sheppard explains by e-mail the concept of the "disturber":

A massive object or great disturber would perturb or disturb anything that came close to it. So objects that stay away from the great disturber would be the most stable objects. Thus the great disturber can “shepherd” objects into similar types of orbits with similar arguments of perihelion which are the orbits which constantly keep the smaller objects away from the bigger object. This is seen in the Near Earth asteroids, where there is a preference for Near Earth Asteroids to have certain orbital angles to keep them away from close encounters with the Earth.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Astronomy
KEYWORDS: asteroids; astronomy; caltech; chadtrujillo; deusexmachina; districtofcolumbia; greatdisturber; joelachenbach; johnmatese; jupiter; kbo; konstantinbatygin; kuiperbelt; mikebrown; nearearthasteroids; newhorizons; ninthplanet; planets; planetx; pluto; scottsheppard; solarsystem; tno; washingtoncompost; washingtonpost; xplanets
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: BenLurkin
http://home.dtm.ciw.edu/users/sheppard/satellites/

Scott Sheppard's website
21 posted on 09/05/2015 9:14:16 PM PDT by BigEdLB (We need to target the 'Ministry of Virtue' on Iranian bombing runs. It is not vituous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

Well now. I don’t need me a beer.


22 posted on 09/05/2015 10:00:09 PM PDT by Slyfox (If I'm ever accused of being a Christian, I'd like there to be enough evidence to convict me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

I didn’t know that you could say “mass perturber” on the internet.

Where are the sex PC police when you need them?


23 posted on 09/05/2015 11:04:27 PM PDT by MadMax, the Grinning Reaper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

leave it to Joe....


24 posted on 09/05/2015 11:26:15 PM PDT by brivette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Welp. When it’s your time, it’s your time is the way I was raised.


25 posted on 09/06/2015 12:11:14 AM PDT by 80skid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin; KevinDavis; annie laurie; Knitting A Conundrum; Viking2002; Ernest_at_the_Beach; ...
Thanks BenLurkin.
 
X-Planets
· join · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post new topic · subscribe ·
Google news searches: exoplanet · exosolar · extrasolar ·

26 posted on 09/06/2015 12:26:26 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

GOD has a plan for all of us.


27 posted on 09/06/2015 12:51:41 AM PDT by 80skid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin
Wake me when they discover Planet XXX.
28 posted on 09/06/2015 12:53:14 AM PDT by uglybiker (nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-nuh-BATMAN!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Isn’t that this how the existence of Pluto was indicated? differences in the orbits of the nearer planets that had to be because of influences of an unknown orbiter?


29 posted on 09/06/2015 4:13:53 AM PDT by Gaffer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TruthInThoughtWordAndDeed
"The Bible refers to this object as the great Red Dragon."

Sound reasoning that lines up with Scripture.

I used to think the "end" was maybe a generation or two away, but I never could have imagined how fast the prophetic time-table would be upon us.

To paraphrase Joe Biden: This Iran agreement is a big f'in deal - I believe it means much more than many here on Freerepublic may think, unless you are intimately familiar with the Bible.

30 posted on 09/06/2015 4:38:31 AM PDT by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

When the central body is the sun, the periapsis is the perihelion. The plane of reference is the ecliptic plane, the plane that contains the earth's orbit. The argument of the perihelion is just the angle between the point where an object's orbit crosses from north to south (from below to above the ecliptic) and the point on its orbit nearest the sun, measured through the sun. North in the ecliptic plane is the direction of the earth's orbital angular velocity vector, which conveniently is more or less (within about 23.5 degrees) of the direction of the earth's rotation axis, south to north positive.

31 posted on 09/06/2015 5:14:11 AM PDT by Lonesome in Massachussets (Men need a reason to shop. Women need a place.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

That link doesn’t constitute evidence, either.


32 posted on 09/06/2015 5:43:04 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Alas Babylon!; BenLurkin; TaxPayer2000; BigEdLB; D_Idaho; Gaffer; Lonesome in Massachussets; ...

Thanks all.

Here’s a scientist’s website, he’s an advocate of the Nemesis model:

http://muller.lbl.gov/homepage.html#nemesis
http://muller.lbl.gov/
http://muller.lbl.gov/pages/nemch1.htm (thanks ForGod’sSake)

John Matese has written about comet focussing (that long-period comets are disproportionately arriving from the same point in the outer solar system):

http://www.ucs.louisiana.edu/~jjm9638/matese.html


33 posted on 09/06/2015 6:05:01 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (What do we want? REGIME CHANGE! When do we want it? NOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson