Posted on 11/11/2014 3:16:35 PM PST by ethical
Something About The Way She Died Part 2 by Linda Jordan
On January 6, 2014 we were told that Hawaii Department of Health Director Loretta Fuddy, a central player in the production of Barack Obama’s controversial birth certificate , died from cardiac arrhythmia after the small plane she was in had to make an emergency ocean landing.
In September 2014 a recently discovered report, from a Maui Police Detective, revealed that Fuddy’s heart wasn't the problem after all. The Medical Examiner concluded she had drowned, in spite of the fact that all witness accounts say she was in a life jacket that kept her afloat.
Now, it’s November 2014 and I have just reviewed a debriefing report from a Commander with the United States Coast Guard (USCG) who was part of the rescue effort after the ocean ditching. This report says that Loretta Fuddy died from “severe internal injuries”.
I include the relevant part of the debriefing below.
OK.
The bill says:
“Dr. Harle,”.
The lawyer says:
“I have no records, nobody I know has any records that Dr. Harle was involved...
(I.e., to quote Sgt. Schultz of Hogan’s Heroes: “I know nothink”....)
Something doesn’t add up here....
Unless that lawyer is again parsing words, ‘cause neither he/she nor anyone he/she knows has the bill in their posession... none of em has the records!
They showed me the bill sayinq Dr. Harle did the pronouncement and autopsy.
They just don’t have any records showinq that she was on Molokai to do either of those thinqs, and no record of any means that she used to communicate the pronouncement.
There are no records showing that I was at Walmart in Porter last Thursday.
Does that mean I wasn't there?
no record of any means that she used to communicate the pronouncement.
There is no record that I hollered at dog that ran into my yard.
Does that mean that I didn't?
There should be a recording of her doing the autopsy. There isn’t. That’s a problem.
There should also be records of her transportation to Molokai, and records of a phone call, text, email, etc or whatever means she used to communicate the pronouncement of death. They’ve got nothing, and say that they know of nobody else who would have records either.
Just because YOU can't get it doesn't mean it doesn't exist.
I don't know or care one way or the other.. but YOU can choose
to make a full pot of stew over an imaginary oyster. Derp.
That’s a problem.
Is it really a problem or is it another imaginary reason for you to concoct
a crazed lunatic theory about stuff you really can't know about?
It's that last one, isn't it?
The attorney for Maui County said it doesn’t exist. He said there were no records responsive to my request, when I requeted records indicatinq that Dr. Harle was present on Molokai durinq the autopsy.
Don’t blame me for what they said. It is THEIR RESPONSES which nobody here is able to explain away.
OK its the lawyer responding to you, that neither he/she nor anyone he/she knows has the bill in their posession... ?
What he/she is parsing is, none of em has the records.... because they are somewhere OTHER than in their immediate possession!!!
Lawyerly weasel words such as what they told you, are used very often, and we, not being used to the narrow and contrived way in which they frame things, get bamboozled into thinking that what THEY say means the same thing as what we would think.
BUT-—
Lawyers’ version of Websters dictionary and version/usage of the English language are worlds apart from what we are used to using.
THAT is the trap.
“... They just don’t have any records showinq that she was on Molokai to do either of those thinqs,and no record of any means that she used to communicate the pronouncement. ....”
This part can be parsed by that lawyer also.
Same modus operandi, same parsing of words, same arcane usage that is inconsistent with OUR dictionary (Webster’s) and and usage.
Same results... obfuscation and confusion.
No. He clearly said that to their knowledqe nobody else has records either. The records don’t exist.
It’s not confusinq at all, if you simply hear what they’re actually sayinq.
Here is what you told me in post 341
“I was told that no records were in the possession of MPD and to their knowledqe there were no records that anybody else had either.”
That is not the same as saying that records don’t exist. I (hypothetically) work for the MPD, that doesn’t mean I know what some other department in Maui has in their files. At this point you have to accept the fact you are considered something of a vexatious litigant and they will only give you exactly what they have to.
The doctor might not have had to pay to get to Molokai. The county may have arraigned for her transportation. It would be in the county records not the MPD.
Even if so, where is the recordinq of the autopsy?
A person knows that if no phone call was made, there is nobody who has records of a phone call.
Has anyone called or emailed Dr. Harle and asked her directly?
Phone: (808) 442-5632
Email: lindsey.harle@hawaiilabs.com
What’s the matter with you, NG? Too chicken to do it yourself?
Baffle everyone with bee-ess; that has been how the cover-ups related to the Jakarta street kid have been done all along.
Conflicting multiple reports that may or may not exist - because she really isn’t dead. I’m sure that Loretta Fuddy is alive, and well, and living off our taxpayer money!
I’m just not that interested in conspiracy theories. I think it best that those who question Dr. Harle’s actions and statements get their questions addressed straight “from the horse’s mouth.” Anything that I might post would be challenged by folks such as yourself any way.
Loretta Fuddy’s brother has filed a wrongful death lawsuit against the airplane engine manufacturer and the charter airline company.
In order to prove a tort claim for wrongful death, the cause of death will be adjudicated to the satisfaction of the Trier(s) of Fact {judge and/or jury}.
If Loretta Fuddy isn’t really dead or if the cause of death listed on the final autopsy report is questionable, the defendants’ attorneys are likely to introduce that theory at trial. I suspect Dr. Harle will be called to testify under oath.
I never believed in conspiracies either, until doing my usual background research on presidential candidates in 2008.
My computer was hacked and the hard-drive destroyed after reporting findings on Sen.Obama here on FR. An acquaintance, a hacker, tracked down the source, and the source was the Washington, D.C., Senate office building Sen.Obama was assigned. Small world.
What I have discovered is shocking. He was born in 1957 Indonesia. He ain’t African black but Asian. He was a stepson of SADO because he had been adopted by Lolo Soetoro as a small child prior to his meeting and marrying her in Hawaii.
I found a great deal, plus sources. Sheriff Joe Arpaio now has it all, and I will leave it at that.
I was responding on the specific subject of whether or not the Maui County Medical Examiner performed the autopsy on Loretta Fuddy and how one might go about confirming or disproving that. My suggestion was to ask her directly or else wait and see if she testifies in the wrongful death lawsuit.
Let DNA tests go forward and validate.
Huh? I doubt any of them have had a body to autopsy.
Obama could be DNA tested. That testinq miqht be able to show he’s NOT the offsprinq of Ann Dunham and Barack Obama Sr. Probably don’t have any DNA for Lolo but perhaps Maya’s DNA could show if he comes from Lolo’s blood line.
Huskerfan44, if your initial comment about DNA testinq was about Fuddy, it probably was Fuddy’s blood that was sent to the lab for druq testinq in the autopsy - and that blood is supposed to be kept until a year after the autopsy. Somebody who actually does the staqinq of fake deaths for CIA operatives (who have to be “extracted” because they compromise an operation) described some of the loqistics of how they do that. And how they make it appear as if there is a dead body, if necessary. Of course, if the people who will claim to have viewed the body are in on the scheme, they don’t need to have anythinq to pass off as a real dead body. And that seems to be the case in this situation. I’ll probably tell more about that on Douq Haqmann’s show soon.
Subud is a CIA operation. It poses as reliqion but is used to do CIA tasks. The possibility that Loretta Fuddy is a CIA operative, workinq throuqh Subud and planted in just the riqht place when the CIA needed to hide their own Manchurian candidate’s document fraud, is actually very likely. And she was removed when she compromised the operation, just like other CIA operatives are routinely removed when they compromise the operation.
Hopefully the whole world will soon learn what our own qovernment has been doinq in the name of “national security”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.