Posted on 06/26/2012 12:27:17 AM PDT by Windflier
Few people doubt there is intelligent alien life in the Milky Way galaxy, but where can we expect to find it?
Astronomers think that the inner sector of the Milky Way Galaxy may be the most likely to support habitable worlds.
Unfortunately some of these places are also most dangerous to all life-forms.
According to Michael Gowanlock of NASA's Astrobiology Institute, and his Trent University colleagues David Patton and Sabine McConnel, habitability in the Milky Way can be based on three factors: supernova rates, metallicity (the abundance of heavy elements, used as a proxy for planet formation) and the time taken for complex life to evolve.
The scientists discovered that although the greater density of stars in the inner galaxy (out to a distance of 8,100 light years from the galactic center) meant that more supernovae exploded, with more planets becoming sterilized by the radiation from these exploding stars, the chances of finding a habitable planet there was ten times more likely than in the outer Galaxy.
This contradicts previous studies that, for example, suggested the Galactic Habitable Zone (GHZ) to be a belt around the Galaxy between distances of 22,800 light years (7 kiloparsecs) and 29,300 light years (9 kiloparsecs) from the galactic center.
What's noticeable is that our Sun orbits the Galaxy at a distance of about 26,000 light years (8 kiloparsecs) - far outside GHZ proposed by Gowanlock's team.
Why is their proposed galactic habitable zone so different?
"We assume that metallicity scales with planet formation," says Gowanlock. Heavy elements are produced by dying stars, and the more generations of stars there have been, the greater the production of these elements (or 'metals' as they are termed by astronomers). Historically, the greatest amount of star formation has occurred in the inner region of the Milky Way.
"The inner Galaxy is the most metal-rich, and the outer Galaxy is the most metal-poor. Therefore the number of planets is highest in the inner Galaxy, as the metallicity and stellar density is the highest in this region."
Supernovae - a real danger to all extraterrestrial life
However, amongst so much star formation lurks a danger: supernovae. Gowanlock's team modeled the effects of the two most common forms of supernovae - the accreting white dwarfs that produce type Ia supernovae, and the collapsing massive stars of type II supernovae.
Measurements of the galactic abundance of the isotope aluminum-26, which is a common by-product of type II supernovae, have allowed astronomers to ascertain that a supernova explodes on average once every 50 years. Meanwhile, previous studies have indicated that a supernova can have a deleterious effect on any habitable planet within 30 light years.
"In our model, we assume that the build-up of oxygen and the ozone layer is required for the emergence of complex life," says Gowanlock. "Supernovae can deplete the ozone in an atmosphere. Therefore, the survival of land-based complex life is at risk when a nearby supernova sufficiently depletes a great fraction of the ozone in a planet's atmosphere."
The team discovered that at some time in their lives, the majority of stars in our Galaxy will be bathed in the radiation from a nearby supernova, whereas around 30% of stars remain untouched or unsterilized.
"Sterilization occurs on a planet that is roughly [at a distance] between 6.5 to 98 light years, depending on the supernovae," says Gowanlock. "In our model, the sterilization distances are not equal, as some supernovae are more lethal than others."
Although the outer regions of the Galaxy, with their lower density of stars and fewer supernovae, are generally safer, the higher metallicity in the inner Galaxy means that the chances of finding an unsterilized, habitable world are ten times greater, according to Gowanlock's model. However, their model does not stipulate any region of the Galaxy to be uninhabitable, only that it's less likely to find habitable planets elsewhere.
This explains why our Solar System can reside far outside of the inner region, and it also gives hope to SETI - Gowanlock's model proposes that there are regions of the Galaxy even more likely to have life, and many SETI searches are already targeted towards the galactic center.
We must also not forget that the Galactic Habitable Zone isn't static. The research paper written by Gowanlock's team points out that over time the metallicity of the Galaxy will begin to increase the farther out one travels from the galactic center.
"This is why stars that form at a later date have a greater chance of having terrestrial planets," says Gowanlock. As a result, perhaps the heyday for life in our Galaxy is yet to come.
Strictly speaking, there can be no someplace else.
Of course super novae are caused by Republican policies and George Bush is responsible for the destruction of alien life as a result. (sarcasm)
And I ate all those leftover Milky Way bars after halloween......the horror.....the horror.....
"As democracy is perfected, the office represents, more and more closely, the inner soul of the people. We move toward a lofty ideal. On some great and glorious day the plain folks of the land will reach their hearts desire at last, and the White House will be adorned by a downright moron."
--H.L. Mencken, The Baltimore Evening Sun, July 26, 1920
***A supernova sterilizes an alien world in this artist’s impression. Credit: David A Aguilar (CfA)****
There is a Navajo rez with water on other planets? That volcanic plug looks too much like Aglatha Peak in NE AZ.
To whit, denser areas are going to have higher odds of cosmic collisions and other cosmic events (supernovae) that are going to keep knocking down the chances for ETI to develop.
Including Earth I suppose.
Which means they'll be looking for a new place to live.
Well, Obama believes there is intelligent alien life in the Milky Way galaxy. That’s why he’s not going to deport them while they are earning college degrees.
Do you believe the Bible?
There are some common sense rules of thumb about life in the Milky Way. To start with, create a timetable for it that is 14.5 billion years.
The first 4.5 billion years are pretty much lost because the galaxy was in a formative period, and its first stars had yet to start exploding and forming metals in the process, and the overall galaxy was very irradiated and “hot”. So the actual life formation on planets that *could* be habitable probably started around 10 billion years ago.
Based on the history of Earth, it took about a billion years for basic one-celled life to emerge. Earth might have been helped by a bombardment of metals from a nearby supernova, also possibly by the Theia object, increasing its mass and possibly giving a lot of metals to Earth.
We have absolutely no evidence of “alien species” in the inner Milky Way, but we know they are in danger.
Planets closer than 6.5 light years to a supernova are probably annihilated.
Gold mining probably wasn't their only motivation for being here. They also may not have been the most powerful race out there. Perhaps they were forced to pick over the meager takings in the outer bands of the Milky Way, due to territorial claims by others.
Yes, I almost didn't post the article because of the lead statement. The author could have done a better job with that statement. I would have said, 'the growing consensus among scientists, is that there is intelligent alien life in our galaxy.'
The rest of the article is quite good.
I've never been able to wrap my head around the concept of other universes. We only have one physical universe that we're able to observe (at this time). Other universes have been postulated, but remain theoretical at this point.
I'm content with the one universe we have. There's more of it than any one person can discover in a lifetime.
Great picture. We sometimes need to be reminded that we’re orbiting a minor star, in the hinterlands of a second-rate galaxy. It might be home to us, but it’s not even a whistle stop on the Galactic Express :-)
To whit, denser areas are going to have higher odds of cosmic collisions and other cosmic events (supernovae) that are going to keep knocking down the chances for ETI to develop.
That makes sense. It would also tend to explain why life flourishes on this planet. Our solar system is located in the outer bands of the Milky Way galaxy.
As to SETI, I've believed for a long time that they're monitoring the wrong thing. If advanced civilizations are out there, I highly doubt that they're using the medium of radio to communicate across space. If SETI ever does find coherent emanations of radio signals, they'll likely be coming from a civilization of similar advancement to ours.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.