Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate, The Truth Is In The Pixels and anyone can see it.
April 28 2011 | David C Burgess

Posted on 04/28/2011 10:03:29 AM PDT by DCBurgess58

Lots of people have been discussing the subject of the layers found within President Obama's Long Form Birth Certificate. What I haven't really heard discussed yet is the easiliest seen and most damning problem with the document. It contains mixed pixel sizes, clearly visable to anyone by merely zooming in on the PDF in Adobe Reader. First off, let's download the document from the White House.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf

Once you have downloaded the PDF, follow my instructions for examining it. Some of you may choose to close your eyes to this and not try... But all who do will be in for a shock... You can come to your own conclusions but the truth is unavoidable once you see what I have found.

First off, left click on the PDF to see the full Birth Certificate form as provided by the White House.

Find the part in the upper right hand side, where it says DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and has the numbers 61 10641 written underneath...

Using the Adobe PDF reader, click on the 1600% magnification and look a the numbers 10641...

Check out the number one on the right hand side... notice how pixelated it is? Notice also that it is made up of a bunch of different colors!!! Now get a good feeling for the size of the individual pixels that make up this number...

Now take a look at any of the numbers to the left of the one, notice they are all one color only? More importantly than that, there are numerous places on all the other numbers where you can clearly see how large the size of a single pixel is. The pixals in all the other numbers are only one quarter the size of the pixels in the one on the right hand side.

If you scan a document, the whole document will be made up of identical sized pixels... If this document was real, it would be made up of identical sized pixals...

BUT IT'S NOT!!!

Okay, now zoom the PDF out to where the whole Birth Certificate is visable. Now, left click once on the image and it will go blue... right click and select Copy Image... Now open up Microsoft Paint, Corel Paint Shop or whatever other imaging program you use and paste the image in the program... The basic background of the form is there but almost all of the written data is gone.... What the heck??? Where did all the writing go? There is just white shadowing where the words were.

When you copied the document, the layer with the smaller pixels was NOT coped... That's why you don't see it when you paste the document in an imager... Also notice that the number one on the right hand side did appear in the pasted form. That's because it was the same pixel size as the background form of the document. Now finally, Why is there a white shadow left where the missing text and numbers used to be? Because it was an intentional forgery, they took the time to alter the background of the text and numbers, so that the characters would look realistic... but they screwed up on matching the pixel size of the overlaying text!!!

Finally, remember... I didn't make this PDF... You just downloaded it from the White House!!! GAME... SET... MATCH!!!


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; nonbc; nonnbc; obama; pixels; provenineligible
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-287 next last
Come on Jim Robinson and my fellow Freepers, we have to unite on this. It is a smoking gun that anyone in the public can easily see and understand. We need to unite as a community, as with the Texas ANG document fraud. The document issued by the White House is clearly a forgery, this should be the banner headline on Drudgereport... "White House Long Form Birth Certificate Proved to be Fraudulent".
1 posted on 04/28/2011 10:03:37 AM PDT by DCBurgess58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
It is not about "TRUTH IN THE PIXELS"
It is about "ABIDING BY THE US CONSTITUTION"

It is over.
The impostor, Moslem to the his Marxist core,
is not eligible. And he never was.
Pelosi and the rest of the US Congress should be indicted.

The BC released yesterday shows that Obama
is PROVEN-INELIGIBLE.

Will anyone in the US Congress OR SCOTUS stand up?
OR is America dead


2 posted on 04/28/2011 10:09:32 AM PDT by Diogenesis ( Vi veri veniversum vivus vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

bump to see qat home...


3 posted on 04/28/2011 10:09:43 AM PDT by pgkdan ( "Wherever the Catholic sun doth shine / There's always laughter and good red wine / ...Belloc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

Where is Buckhead when you need him?


4 posted on 04/28/2011 10:09:54 AM PDT by NCC-1701 (In Memphis on January 20, 2009, pump price were $1.49. We all know what happened after that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
African??

African??

African??

This could only be there if they changed it from BLACK after the fact. And that would make the form "invalid on its' face".

And don't forget, recorded documents are only evidence...not proof.

5 posted on 04/28/2011 10:10:09 AM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

[If you scan a document, the whole document will be made up of identical sized pixels... ]

This actually seals the deal. One could argue that optical character recognition software had somehow separated layers. But that wouldn’t have caused pixel changes.


6 posted on 04/28/2011 10:10:16 AM PDT by DaxtonBrown (HARRY: Money Mob & Influence (See my Expose on Reid on amazon.com written by me!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

Please study up on “OCR”

Most scanners can employ a text recognition feature.

Certain characters will be recognized as text, others will not and will be considered as part of the background paper. Thus the different pixels.


7 posted on 04/28/2011 10:11:04 AM PDT by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

this is all well and good, but this needs to be done on tv on beck or hannity, showing a true unaltered doc using the same methodology, then the long form COLB showing the problems...


8 posted on 04/28/2011 10:11:05 AM PDT by raygunfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

It’s happening. The fact is that what the WH put up could not possibly be what was requested, as shown here:

http://hawaii.gov/health/vital-records/Birth_Certificate_Request.PDF

How stupid do these people think we are? I’m not a birther, as it were, but this new BC stinks to high Heaven and there is every reason to shove this right back up their Oval Office.


9 posted on 04/28/2011 10:13:10 AM PDT by West Texas Chuck (Why yes, I do speak Spanglish - "Hasta la later on, amigo. Pardon, would you have any salsa verde?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
If I were the guy in the White House and I had no honesty but had an actual valid certificate on file, I would release a version that had some anomalies, just to keep the controversy going.

Those who care about the issue wouldn't support him anyway, and it helps make those in the middle think that those to the right are kooks. Plus, it helps boost a potential spoiler in the next Presidential election.

10 posted on 04/28/2011 10:13:26 AM PDT by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

I don’t know enough about this to know if it proves anything or not
but as much as I hate tht POS 0dumbo I can’t beleive he would release anything that is so easily proved to be a fake.
He has spent a lot of our taxpayer money fighting against being forced to release it wouldn’t he and his minions have made sure the copy they did release would not so easily b e proved a fake?

is there no other explanation as to why the pixels look suspicious?


11 posted on 04/28/2011 10:14:30 AM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
a zebra doesn't change its stripes...

Obama is a liar and a fraud

Trump has been financially supporting democrats including Obama for years

12 posted on 04/28/2011 10:14:52 AM PDT by xtinct (The will of God will never take you where the Grace of God will not protect you..Be Strong Patriots!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58
You can see the reason for that here:

The software that compressed the PDF containing the scanned image mistakenly put the '1' into the background layer instead of the text layer. Then it compressed it together with the rest of the background, using a different algorithm than the foreground. That’s why it looks different. Happens.

13 posted on 04/28/2011 10:15:10 AM PDT by cartan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

14 posted on 04/28/2011 10:16:33 AM PDT by quantim (Victory is not relative, it is absolute.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gondring

I thought about that contingency as well. But it certainly is a risky strategy. If one ‘respected’ journalist were to be convinced that it is a fraud, then the thing could careen out of control quite rapidly.


15 posted on 04/28/2011 10:17:16 AM PDT by fhayek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

Bump for more clarity. . .


16 posted on 04/28/2011 10:17:45 AM PDT by cricket (Osama - NOT made in the USA. . . .and Obama, not made in the USA either.. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

I don’t want ANY sidetracking of the pixel issue on this thread... PLEASE... I have proved that the document is fraudlent... please address the issue of the pixels only!!! We need to focus and unite on this... It is a smoking gun!!!


17 posted on 04/28/2011 10:18:10 AM PDT by DCBurgess58 (In a Capitalist society, men exploit other men. In a Communist society it's exactly the opposite.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

I have a simple question:

Why did the doctor dot the “i” in his first name, but not either “i” in his last name?


18 posted on 04/28/2011 10:18:35 AM PDT by Uncle Miltie (0bamanomics: Trickle Up Poverty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DCBurgess58

I’m no expert on scanned documents. The problem I have with it is much more simple. Why wouldn’t Obama make sure the document looks authentic? If it were you, wouldn’t you make sure beyond any doubt that it didn’t appear fake? Something just isn’t right about the way it was presented. Just my opinion.


19 posted on 04/28/2011 10:18:38 AM PDT by Snowy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis
Diogenesis, the White House has to know we know this....

They could be jerking our chain yet again just to see us dance...

I'm not saying it isn't a fraud....they whole gang is a fraud...

..but they have been playing us from the beginning...

...I hope this is the smoking gun....but their Machiavellian Soros inspired shenanigans are never ending.

20 posted on 04/28/2011 10:18:57 AM PDT by Guenevere (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 281-287 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson