...although, on the other hand, if he was *entirely* covered by the G-string, that wouldn't be saying much in his favor, would it?
Posted on 11/10/2009 10:20:03 AM PST by llevrok
FORT WALTON BEACH – A 59-year-old Fort Walton Beach man was arrested for indecent exposure after a neighbor saw him Tuesday wearing only a G-string.
A woman reported seeing her Tanager Road neighbor sunbathing, wearing only a pink G-string. She told deputies the man stood up two times and she clearly saw his exposed buttocks, according to an Okaloosa County Sheriff’s report.
The man’s yard also is not enclosed by any fence and is visible from the road, to neighbors and a school bus stop, the report said.
The deputy pulled up to the man’s house. When the man saw the deputy, he got up from his lawn chair and went inside. In doing so, the deputy saw the man’s buttocks, the report said.
When the deputy spoke with him he smelled alcohol on his breath and, according to the report, only part of his genitalia was covered by the G-string.
Again. Your reasoning was poor despite your conclusion being plausible.
You said that “but” usually refers to an anus. Noone would agree with you.
But refers to the entire hinder part including the anus, the gluteous-maximi amd even the uppermost porting of the quads in 99% of the use.
You should take a logic or reasoning class or something.
Obviously, a string cannot cover an anus unless your anus (sphincter) is less than 1/8” across.
Some thongs do cover the anus but G-Strings simply pass across the anus.
This thread is NOT useless without pictures.
Some things just never need to be burned into someone’s brain.
Especially since the people who are most likely to be involved with these kinds of stories are the one’s who should least likely be.
In all reality, the anus isn’t visible on a nude person. And since when is the anus genitalia? I don’t think the article states anything about anus, rectum, or colon being exposed. The guys butt was showing which is probably contrary to a local ordinance. The end of the article implies the dudes testicles(balls, boys, nuts, etc) may have been exposed.
In reality the gluteous-maximi are what covers the “anus” unless someone desides to “bend over and spread-em”.
A police officer made the pinch, arresting Keefe and four other thong-wearing people—three men and a woman—who violated an obscure city ordinance prohibiting the revealing of, among other body parts, the "anal cleft."
Source
But, yes there are laws on the books that vary county by county, state to state; that mandate absolute measurements - lest a policeman decide what he feels is appropriate. I've seen the signs on public beaches that give the minimum measurements.
Ain't that the truth. Spandex is a priviledge, not a right... LOL
How many angels can dance on the head of an anus?
Now we’re getting to the bottom of things!
LOL.... I don’t believe this discussion exists.
And here I was gonna do what the guys do and demand a picture so I can, or cannot, pronounce GUILTY.
;)
I saw a cartoon that I wish I had a copy of.
A cop is giving a fat guy in a swimsuit a ticket and they’re standing next to a sign on the beach that says, *Speedo Limit 30*.
...although, on the other hand, if he was *entirely* covered by the G-string, that wouldn't be saying much in his favor, would it?
OK, then how about this?
Cheers!
Too late, you buzzards. You already read it. Now try to get that mental image out. MUHAHAHAHAHA!
My evil work is done now.
The first six syllables of the story were already enough to make one want to gouge out a mental eye.
What the article doesn’t say is that the man was wearing it around his neck.
Wait, forget about the buttocks, what about from the front? The man has a lot more to expose in front than a woman.
Looks like Steve Howe from YES...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.