Posted on 01/26/2009 7:22:57 AM PST by Sopater
Darwin is dead and his unscientificracist ideas should to be buried also.
Led by the atheistic and misnamed National Center for Science Education and enabled by the main-stream media, colleges, museums, and public schools have launched a last ditch effort to salvage Darwinism.The theme is a yearlong celebration based upon Darwin's 200th birthday on February 12 and the 150th anniversary of the publication of his famous book (see blow) on November 24.
In my state, West VirginiaUniversity has already placed a newspaper add listing events WVU will use to honor Darwin.Revealing consummate hypocrisy is the fact that WVU evolutionist professors are exposed as Debate Dodgers at http://www.lifescienceprize.org/.
Universities and, museums, if public funded, are using tax-payer money to celebrate a man whose ideas have led to the destruction of untold numbers of human lives.What is even more objectionable is that it is a certainty that the public schools, nationwide, will be a focus of this avalanche of propaganda.As a recently retired public school teacher, I find that thought quite disturbing.
For the last five years of my full-time career, with the full knowledge (and dismay) of state and county school officials, as well as the ACLU, I demonstrated to my students that mathematics proves beyond the shadow of doubt that evolutionism is nonsense. The students saw that the evidence clearly shows that every item associated with humans, animals and plants are Intelligent Designs and Intelligent Design is science. I always let the students figure it out for themselves and allowed them to believe what they chose, but at least they were exposed to the scientific facts that extremists want to censor from the minds of public school students.
Few teachers will dare do what I did, especially with today's political situation.Therefore, public school students remain brain-washing subjects for atheists who use cowardly or uninformed educators to propagate their dogma of evolutionism.
Evolutionists use a "bait-and-switch" method of hood-winking gullible children as well as adult products of public schools.Depending on the success of public school brain-washing and the tendency of public school graduates to be too lazy to investigate the facts for themselves, evolutionists mix the term "evolution" with real scientific facts that have nothing to do with the evolution from a particle to a president.
While they put on a good show, behind the scenes evolutionists are scurrying to find a way to explain life without Darwinian references.
Darwinism is all a facade. Darwin's icons (such as the finch beaks) are shams and his disciples want to censor scientific facts about those icons from students.Even the famous Miller-Urey experiment was scientifically debunked years ago.Public school students will not see that in their textbooks or hear that from their teachers.
Public school students are being misled by the imaginative art and wishful thinking of Darwin devotees.A small (25 page) booklet, Biology for the 21st Century (Mastropaolo, 2005.Available from the author at Mastropaolo@surfside.net.) clearly exposes the forgeries and frauds that have accompanied evolutionism throughout history.Bio21C also points out that the exact opposite of evolution is scientific because "billions of people for thousands of years have seen…that all things, viable and nonviable alike, are ravaged by time and that process is found with absolute consistency throughout the universe and is called, devolution." (pg.3)Also, "from trillions of observations by billions of observers for thousands of years, all life forms are fixed…" (pg. 20)In other words, evolution is the exact opposite of reality.
This article began by declaring that Darwin's ideas were racist.The complete title of Darwin's book is On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. There is ample proof that evil men, following what Darwin believed, have committed atrocities upon humans.Even the liberal Washington Post recently ran an article on this subject (Basest Instinct,January 3, 2009; Page C01.Available on line.)
Amazingly, many Christian (in name) churches are being willingly recruited to align themselves with Unitarians, atheists, and other left-wing true-believers in Saint Darwin.The NCSE knows that one "collar" is worth ten Ph. D.'s in persuading the people in the pews that Darwinism is compatible with biblical beliefs. To counter the propaganda pastors are encouraged to sign the Creation Letter at http://kcsg.wordpress.com/.Also, churches are encouraged to invite speakers from local Creation Science groups and have a Creation Sunday..
To celebrate the life of a theology student (Darwin) in the public schools is equivalent to endorsing an "inverted-fantasy religion taught in the public schools in violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America" (Mastropaolo).
Someone said: "Evolution is bad science, bad thinking, bad logic, and certainly bad theology".Society and public schools would be much better served by celebrating the real scientists such as Louis Pasteur orFrancesco Redi.
Let's dump Darwin's beliefs and leave his memory buried with him in the English churchyard.
Published January 26, 2009
Peer review from the SCIENTIFIC perspective from actual scientists.....the Theory will allow....MUST allow.
....but I DO love it every time a creaationist tries to weave a tangled web.
In case you missed it, it’s a scientific theory. Use the scientific method to counter the theory, not a mathematical calculation of possible probabilities.
Cretins
Too silly and too anti-science for anything but a blanket rebuttal: Index of Creationist Claims.
read later
Thank God the bible never made mention of some kind of atomic, electrical, or chemical theory. We might still be living in the dark ages..
Do you have anything to contribute to article aside from your useless, baseless rhetoric?
All life forms are not "fixed" as this article claims. That life forms change was noted decades ago. The theory of evolution was devised to explain those changes. The article is lying--hoping to fool the gullible--when it claims all life forms are fixed.
Here is an example of that change:
Site: Koobi Fora (Upper KBS tuff, area 104), Lake Turkana, Kenya (4, 1)
Discovered By: B. Ngeneo, 1975 (1)
Estimated Age of Fossil: 1.75 mya * determined by Stratigraphic, faunal, paleomagnetic & radiometric data (1, 4)
Species Name: Homo ergaster (1, 7, 8), Homo erectus (3, 4, 7), Homo erectus ergaster (25)
Gender: Female (species presumed to be sexually dimorphic) (1, 8)
Cranial Capacity: 850 cc (1, 3, 4)
Information: Tools found in same layer (8, 9). Found with KNM-ER 406 A. boisei (effectively eliminating single species hypothesis) (1)
Interpretation: Adult (based on cranial sutures, molar eruption and dental wear) (1)
See original source for notes:
Source: http://www.mos.org/evolution/fossils/fossilview.php?fid=33
“unasssailable”?
It sounds like the cult is surrounded by a moat, and the drawbridge only gets lowered to the like-minded.
They probably polled Bill Debmski.
Yes.
LOLz, that’z teh funnay!
It does have a ring of hyperbole to it.
I think these arguments should be limited to only what can be objectively demonstrated. How about you?
It sure doesn’t take long for the atheistic darwinists to start foaming at the mouth! Truth and facts to these guys are like Light to the wicked.
______
What you say is, of course, equally true of the other side of this equation. A scientific article discussing evolution draws the creationist/id camp mouth foamers every bit as rapidly as the other way around.
But more fundamentally, I was wondering if you could point out the specific truth and facts from the accompanying article. I saw a lot of opining, but little in the way of facts and truth. Your help is discerning them will be invaluable.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.