Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Studies of Amazonian languages challenge linguistic theories
Eureka Alert / University of Chicago Press Journals ^ | 2-Aug-2005 | Carrie Olivia Adams

Posted on 08/09/2005 10:57:22 PM PDT by SunkenCiv

The unifying feature behind all of these characteristics is a cultural restriction against talking about things that extend beyond personal experience. This restriction counters claims of linguists, such as Noam Chomsky, that grammar is genetically driven system with universal features. Despite the absence of these allegedly universal features, the Pirahã communicate effectively with one another and coordinate simple tasks. Moreover, Piraha suggests that it is not always possible to translate from one language to another.

(Excerpt) Read more at eurekalert.org ...


TOPICS: History; Science; Travel
KEYWORDS: annaroosevelt; epigraphyandlanguage; godsgravesglyphs; history; precolumbianamazon; slashandburn; terrapreta
Ooh, stop the presses, Chomsky's wrong about something. Never happened before. ;')

FR Lexicon·Posting Guidelines·Excerpt, or Link only?·Ultimate Sidebar Management·Headlines
Donate Here By Secure Server·Eating our own -- Time to make a new start in Free Republic
PDF to HTML translation·Translation page·Wayback Machine·My Links·FreeMail Me
Gods, Graves, Glyphs topic·and group·Books, Magazines, Movies, Music


1 posted on 08/09/2005 10:57:23 PM PDT by SunkenCiv
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: blam; FairOpinion; Ernest_at_the_Beach; StayAt HomeMother; 24Karet; 3AngelaD; asp1; ...
To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list. Thanks.
Please FREEPMAIL me if you want on or off the
"Gods, Graves, Glyphs" PING list or GGG weekly digest
-- Archaeology/Anthropology/Ancient Cultures/Artifacts/Antiquities, etc.
The GGG Digest
-- Gods, Graves, Glyphs (alpha order)

2 posted on 08/09/2005 10:59:34 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

That was going to be my response too.

Noam had a theory about language being genetic. Not all theories are correct.


3 posted on 08/09/2005 11:06:28 PM PDT by weegee (The Rovebaiting by DUAC must stop. It is nothing but a partisan witchhunt.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Interesting that there's a cultural restriction against talking about things that extend beyond one's personal experience. They never would have been able to develop very advanced skills of abstraction that way, which would be pretty key to developing any kind of significant level of civilized society.


4 posted on 08/09/2005 11:10:54 PM PDT by Utmost Certainty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

Chomsky may not have gotten human language right, but his work ended up being very valuable in computer science.


5 posted on 08/09/2005 11:57:51 PM PDT by billybudd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv; Caipirabob
The unifying feature behind all of these characteristics is a cultural restriction against talking about things that extend beyond personal experience.

Qué lástima!

I've got no experience of dating a Carioca. But I sure like talkin' about 'em!

6 posted on 08/10/2005 3:45:46 AM PDT by martin_fierro (< |:)~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
Yet, the Pirahã language and culture has several features that not known to exist in any other in the world and lacks features that have been assumed to be found in all human groups. The language does not have color words or grammatical devices for putting phrases inside other phrases. They do not have fiction or creation myths, and they have a lack of numbers and counting.

I don't see what exactly this proves. Old English was at least very restricted in color words: words signifying brightness and darkness, however, abound. (We students never knew quite how to translate fealu, "yellow, tawny, dun-col9ured, grey, dusky, dark.") I read years ago that number was always a late development in language. Not sure what fiction or creation myths have to do with language per se.

I assume they think Chomsky's theories about deep structure and surface structure are disproved, but without more information (lots more), I don't see how. Did Chomsky claim that all languages exploit every possibility of meaning? That would be laughable on the face of it; there's no reason they should, any more than every language must uese every phoneme the human vocal apparatus is capable of.

Also, regarding the apparent lack of fiction (I assume they mean traditional stories and myths rather than modern realistic fiction, which was a rather late development) and creation myths, I seem to recall reading numerous times over the years of primitive tribes who are more than capable of keeping things they consider important from outsiders.

7 posted on 08/10/2005 4:58:11 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I follow a different theory of language than Chomsky's, but I don't see how the information mentioned in the article does what the author claims. It sounds like they're using this find as a pretext to promote a philosophical theory of language derived from an epistemology which has nothing to do with the find itself.


8 posted on 08/10/2005 11:25:27 AM PDT by Fedora
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maryz; SunkenCiv
They do not have fiction or creation myths, and they have a lack of numbers and counting.

I'm not buying that for a quarter!

I am supposed to believe that primitve hunter-gathers living in the midst of a major river system don't sit around the camp fire talking about their fishing skills & their sexploits?

9 posted on 08/10/2005 12:08:38 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Marching Morons are coming...and they're breeding more Democrats beyond all reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

read later


10 posted on 08/10/2005 5:26:30 PM PDT by LiteKeeper (The radical secularization of America is happening)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

And if they're so great at keeping secrets, maybe they just have chosen to conceal their creation myths. ;')


11 posted on 08/10/2005 10:14:38 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

I guess I misunderstood. I thought "creation myths" referred to who was getting how much from whom, after the lights go out...and who was left "wearng horns". :)


12 posted on 08/10/2005 10:22:28 PM PDT by ApplegateRanch (The Marching Morons are coming...and they're breeding more Democrats beyond all reason!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ApplegateRanch

If they lack numbers, they may find it difficult to, uh, talk about size...


13 posted on 08/10/2005 10:30:40 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Tuesday, May 10, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: maryz
It doesn't, the atrial proves nothing, every language has a way to differentiate between one and more than one.

I think that Chomsky was saying that the whole of language exploits all of the range of possibilities of Language.

I agree with you on Old English but a lot could be taken from context for example, Homer, Wine dark sea, no color there, but everyone knew what color wine was.

14 posted on 08/11/2005 6:10:13 PM PDT by Little Bill (A 37%'r, a Red Spot on a Blue State, rats are evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Little Bill
Wine dark sea, no color there, but everyone knew what color wine was.

LOL! Not the color of any sea I've ever seen -- maybe ". . . the multitudinous seas incarnadine"?

15 posted on 08/12/2005 2:14:09 AM PDT by maryz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Primate communication linked to social bonding

Communication evolved hand-in-hand with social bonding, suggests a new study of non-human primates, which probes the origins of language.

“The work tells us that communication is right there at the base of social behaviour and that having a larger vocal repertoire allows you to have a more complex social set up,” says Karen McComb, at the University of Sussex, UK, who carried out the work.

McComb, with Stuart Semple at Roehampton University in London, UK, used published data on 42 different non-human primates species to examine the relationships between the number of vocal calls, group size and the length of time spent grooming. They also used phylogenetic analysis to take into account evolutionary relationships between species.

The data analysis showed strong relationships between vocal repertoire size and group size, as well as between repertoire size and the amount of time spent grooming, says McComb: “This suggests that changes in communication can facilitate changes in social behaviour.”

Big hurdles

The analysis only revealed correlations, so it was impossible to determine causal relationships – whether increases in vocal repertoire caused increases in group size and time spent grooming, or vice versa.

It is also important to remember that there are radical differences between non-human primate vocal repertoires and human languages, says McComb. So it does not follow that languages as complex as ours will necessarily follow from increases in group sizes and social interactions. “There are other big hurdles that have to be overcome to get to human language,” she says.

But some human languages may offer clues, such as Pirahã – a language spoken by only 200 people in Amazonas, Brazil. “Their very small inventory of phonemes could presumably have been made by much earlier branches of hominids,” says Daniel Everett, a language expert at Manchester University, UK.

Journal reference: Royal Society Biology Letters (DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2005.036)

Printed on Thu Aug 25 14:04:37 BST 2005

16 posted on 08/25/2005 6:07:46 AM PDT by SunkenCiv (Down with Dhimmicrats! I last updated by FR profile on Sunday, August 14, 2005.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


17 posted on 04/11/2006 6:30:54 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


· join list or digest · view topics · view or post blog · bookmark · post a topic · subscribe ·

 
Gods
Graves
Glyphs
Just updating the GGG info, not sending a general distribution.

To all -- please ping me to other topics which are appropriate for the GGG list.
GGG managers are SunkenCiv, StayAt HomeMother, and Ernest_at_the_Beach
 

·Dogpile · Archaeologica · ArchaeoBlog · Archaeology · Biblical Archaeology Society ·
· Discover · Nat Geographic · Texas AM Anthro News · Yahoo Anthro & Archaeo · Google ·
· The Archaeology Channel · Excerpt, or Link only? · cgk's list of ping lists ·


18 posted on 11/27/2009 8:39:50 PM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/__Since Jan 3, 2004__Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


19 posted on 07/29/2018 10:48:46 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (www.tapatalk.com/groups/godsgravesglyphs/, forum.darwincentral.org, www.gopbriefingroom.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson