Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

King Charles is 'evicting Harry and Meghan from Frogmore Cottage leaving them without a UK home - and offering the property to Prince Andrew'
Daily Mail ^ | David Averre and Elizabeth Haigh

Posted on 02/28/2023 10:54:24 PM PST by shadowlands1960

-The Palace purportedly chose to evict Harry and Meghan after release of 'Spare' -It is said Charles wants Andrew to move into the five-bed Frogmore Cottage -Duke of York currently resides at massive Royal Lodge despite paying peanuts

King Charles has decided to evict Prince Harry and Meghan Markle from their royal residence at Frogmore Cottage in favour of Prince Andrew, it has been claimed.

Buckingham Palace issued an eviction notice to the Duke and Duchess of Sussex days after Harry's memoir Spare - in which he made a series of sensational claims against the Royal Family - hit UK shelves in January, according to The Sun.

Instead, the Palace seeks to replace the pair with the disgraced Duke of York, who currently inhabits the larger Royal Lodge, the paper alleges.

Andrew is said to be resisting the move, but it is said Harry and Meghan will be forced to leave the cottage - their only remaining home in the UK - and fully complete their relocation to the US irrespective of whether Andrew moves in.

The revelation comes with preparations for King Charles' Coronation in May well underway amid speculation that Prince Harry may not receive an invitation.

(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Local News; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS: buhbye; charlesiii; exroyalskickedout; frogmorecottage; gone; harryandthewitch; houseofwindsor; pedophileprince; princeandrew; royalinbreds; spare; sparehouse; spareroom; unitedkingdom
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last
To: JayGalt

I doubt they would leave their $14 million mansion in Montecito, even though they didn’t become “Hollywood royalty” like they thought they would.


81 posted on 03/01/2023 7:00:57 AM PST by Inspectorette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 78 | View Replies]

To: kelly4c; GrannyAnn; wildcard_redneck; miserare; nathanbedford; Secret Agent Man; Mozzafiato; ...

Just to set the record straight. If the conjunction was legal in the UK it is difficult to justify calling it evidence of pedophilia however distasteful one might find it.

What is the United Kingdom Age of Consent?
The Age of Consent in United Kingdom is 16 years old. The age of consent is the minimum age at which an individual is considered legally old enough to consent to participation in sexual activity. Individuals aged 15 or younger in United Kingdom are not legally able to consent to sexual activity, and such activity may result in prosecution for statutory rape or the equivalent local law.


82 posted on 03/01/2023 7:04:43 AM PST by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Inspectorette

If the money stops rolling in when the sparkle is off Markle they may have no choice. It must be expensive to run, keep in repair & pay taxes.


83 posted on 03/01/2023 7:06:28 AM PST by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

Harry and Markle would be the perfect cast for a movie about Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings.


84 posted on 03/01/2023 7:08:56 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler

An appalling oversight, to be sure.


85 posted on 03/01/2023 7:13:31 AM PST by Interesting Times (This space for rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GrannyAnn

exactly! I’m pretty sure the word is “pederast” when she’s young but developed like a woman.


86 posted on 03/01/2023 7:13:40 AM PST by ronniesgal (friends don't let friends be Kardashians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: shadowlands1960

O NO!

Meg and Spare are now homeless.

That is what happens when you diss the Queen [R.I.P.] and new King.

If they hurry and relocate to Oregon, Oregon is considering giving the homeless $1000/month. Maybe the grifters can qualify.


87 posted on 03/01/2023 7:14:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr Rogers

i agree.
still trying to figure out how the girls ( Virginia Guiffree) parents thought going off with Epstein was a good idea.


88 posted on 03/01/2023 7:15:38 AM PST by ronniesgal (friends don't let friends be Kardashians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: central_va

I doubt Harry has the gravitas. He looks like one long drawn out whine of entitlement, wronged.
I think you might be wronging Sally as well since she seems to have been a very intelligent woman who could have stayed in France as a freed woman but agreed to return to the US with the family on the commitment that all her children would be emancipated.


89 posted on 03/01/2023 7:16:33 AM PST by JayGalt (For evil men to accomplish their purpose it is only necessary that good men should do nothing.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

The greys are doing Harry a favor, actually, by taking the bills off his hands, on a cottage he has visited only once in three years. Princess Eugenie was the one actually living there ‘living there’, but moved out last May when her do-nothing husband found work in Portugal.


90 posted on 03/01/2023 7:25:30 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Tanned, rested, and ready.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Googling “foppish”.


91 posted on 03/01/2023 7:30:21 AM PST by cornfedcowboy ( )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cnsmom

Newsweek:

Frogmore comes with de facto police security because it is on the private estate around Windsor Castle, meaning it is not only a haven from press intrusion and royal watchers but is also protected from terrorist attacks and assassination attempts.

So losing Frogmore for Harry and Meghan would mean far more than losing a home. When they came to Britain for the Platinum Jubilee in June they only attended official events where they were offered police protection because they had been invited.

Beyond those, Harry and Meghan chose to stay in police protected Frogmore rather than step out with no armed Metropolitan Police bodyguards.

While they have their own private security, those bodyguards are not legally allowed to carry guns in Britain and cannot speed them through red traffic lights.

Future visits to the U.K. would therefore have to be carefully planned without Frogmore Cottage as a base.


92 posted on 03/01/2023 7:34:05 AM PST by WeaslesRippedMyFlesh (wake me up when somebody tells the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Thanks... gives more clarity to what is up...


93 posted on 03/01/2023 7:42:43 AM PST by shadowlands1960 (We live in a world of intolerance masked as tolerance. RUSH LIMBAUGH)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: JayGalt

for real. a smash ending to black history month imho. :)


94 posted on 03/01/2023 7:56:50 AM PST by ronniesgal (friends don't let friends be Kardashians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: ronniesgal

Wasn’t she above the age of consent in England at the time she claimed it happened?

And I have a problem with a woman who accuses a man, seriously harming his reputation, and then turns around and says, “I now recognize I may have made a mistake in identifying Mr. Dershowitz,”


95 posted on 03/01/2023 8:00:47 AM PST by Jamestown1630 ("A Republic, if you can keep it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: WeaslesRippedMyFlesh

Where will they have a birthday party for “Archie” now?


96 posted on 03/01/2023 8:04:27 AM PST by pnz1 ("These people have gone stone-cold crazy")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: nathanbedford

Harry and his bride don’t reside in England anymore so they don’t need that house


97 posted on 03/01/2023 8:08:34 AM PST by Nifster ( I see puppy dogs in the clouds )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Brooklyn Attitude

“And there is Meghan, who just queefed”...


98 posted on 03/01/2023 8:32:56 AM PST by Secret Agent Man (Gone Galt; not averse to Going Bronson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
If they hurry and relocate to Oregon, Oregon is considering giving the homeless $1000/month. Maybe the grifters can qualify.

If they move to San Francisco Meghan can get $5 million in reparations.

99 posted on 03/01/2023 8:37:02 AM PST by Mozzafiato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies]

To: central_va

“Harry and Markle would be the perfect cast for a movie about Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings.”

If it was an honest movie, it would show nothing going on between TJ and SH.

https://www.tjheritage.org/articles


100 posted on 03/01/2023 8:45:02 AM PST by Mr Rogers (We're a nation of feelings, not thoughts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-140 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson