Classless Trump Gleefully Echos Crude Insult from Crazed Supporter... Enough Already

Reaganite Republican ^ | 09 February 2016 | Reaganite Republican

[Reaganite Republican]

Hey Trumpsters/Breitbart/Drudge... talking to you here:

How the hell can you continue to support such a fowl-mouthed, disingenuous boor like Donald Trump? For President of the United States of America...? 


There is nothing so d__n special about him that compels you -or anybody- 
to put up with this kind of language, tone, and monumental dishonesty.

He's not a conservative, he's not a good Christian, and he's obviously not even a good role model... the televised, public rallies could be rated R. 

Donald Trump has absolutely no right to talk and act like this- the guy is simply way out of line. 

What kind of president talks like this? 

Everyday Trump takes it yet another notch lower, and you make still more excuses for this pompous jerk because you 'think' he's the 'only one who can save us'
and/or he's 'self-funding', implying incorruptible (not true). 

So many still willing to make a shameless narcissist wrecking ball the most powerful man in the world, joining him in slandering a deeply-principled Christian patriot -Ted Cruz- just so they can get their jollies 'voting him off the island' so as to favor the most colorful character. And isn't it fun to feel like you were part of something YUGE... and 'won'?

Meanwhile, let's all pile-on Ted Cruz with whatever BS narrative Trump spoon feeds us while we completely and utterly blow the best opportunity to install a true conservative in the White House in a long, long time... madness.

Not only are there other -better- choices available in this primary -at least one- the fact that most will explain-away anything Trump does as you do shows it's largely devolved into a cult, where they refuse to respond to the logic of 'outsiders'. 

Many of Trump's cheering fans -and that's all a lot of them are- don't care any more about his dubious past than the asinine antics they today glorify as 'strength'. And they're delighted to lynch anybody he tells them to.

What 'leader' of any sort takes such endless cheap shots, makes a point of noting he's better than you at every opportunity- lies all the time, contradicts himself constantly, and cusses in public like a sailor in a hailstorm? Has an infantile temper-tantrum and invents wild, far-fetched excuses when he loses?

And aren't we just finishing two dreadful terms with the same kind of power-drunk Alinskyite beast that demonizes whomever he feels he needs to...  instead of discussing the issues -or answering questions- honestly? The type that underhandedly attempts to disqualify opponents rather than compete in any sort of good-faith way?

Donald Trump was actually a soft 2nd choice for me, up until a few weeks ago... when all my worst suspicions were confirmed- Trump himself had made it clear he was aching to 'go after' Cruz and 'hit back 10x as hard' the minute Ted provided him any sort of excuse. I guess kicking Trump's ass in Iowa provided additional justification in The Donald's vengeful, warped mind.

Other than the violent rhetoric, Trump rallies are starting to resemble 'community organizing' in other ways too, targeting who to 'hate' while energizing and bringing as many low-info types aboard as possible. The most fervent Trumpsters are acting like a bunch of amped-up brownshirts online and at these events.

This Trump is a godless, foul-mouthed pig. Some of you people -if you insist on enabling this wolf-in-sheep's-clothing- should at least demand he up his game and behave like an adult in public, one with maybe a speck of class... all the black-n-gold shiny stuff in the world doesn't give you that. 

One feels compelled to question the judgment -and even intelligence- of anybody so willing to speak in such vile terms at a presidential primary rally... there are KIDS in audience Trump, you overrated slob. 

Hating, swearing, going to kill and crush everybody -not gonna take it anymore- rah rah rah. Nuremberg had nothing on you, Donald.

Maybe Sarah or Falwell Jr can offer some fresh excuse for these appalling, un-Christianlike spectacles? Perhaps explain why they endorsed this nut?

Or did they already cash the check and have no reason care anymore?

[Lib-Lickers 2]

good points..

lets remember what the word screw means when talking about something sexual or getting done wrong.. its slang for the F-word and everybody knows it and everybody uses it even people like like Meghan Kelly on the air

the word pussy when used as a noun to describe somebody who weenies out of a situation is used all the time... James Bond must have said it ten times in Goldfinger back in 1964 and nobody gave a whit.. I call my cat pussy puss and vulgarity never enters my mind..

Trump didnt use it to describe another person a woman audience member did,, he started laughing and the crowed asked him what she had said,, so he told them she said he was a pussy laughing as he said it and a few thousand people roared with laughter and applause.. how horrible a man is Trump for having some fun with his people at his rally..

[ETL]

Russia Ramping Up Military Drills to Cold War Levels, NATO Says

Feb 5, 2016 - FoxNews.com

Russia has stepped up its military maneuvers to a level unseen since the height of the Cold War, according to a new report released by NATO Thursday.

Jens Stoltenberg, the alliance's secretary general and author of the report, noted that Moscow has conducted at least 18 large-scale exercises over the past three years, "some of which have involved more than 100,000 troops."

Those exercises included several simulated nuclear attacks against NATO allies and partner nations ..."

http://www.foxnews.com/world/2016/02/05/russia-ramping-up-military-drills-to-cold-war-levels-nato-says.html

[jonrick46]

Here is a little history of the word pussy. It almost certainly started likening a woman to a pussycat in the 19th century or earlier. The phrase pussyfooting around, which appears around 1900, implied being timid, afraid, like a cat. No sense of woman there.

Pussy was in use in theater circles by the late 1940’s to mean a homosexual male. Interesting how these terms morph from women to homosexual males, much like a faggot. I don’t think Trump hired any homos. Pussycats? Hmmmmm.

[nikos1121]

He looks like a big Cruzer.

I’m going to post this again, so bare with me.

Ok...I’m listening to F & Fs. And they’re going to have Bush, and Rubio and Trump.

Ok... so Bush comes out first. I’m going to be open minded and pretend like I’m not decided.

Before Bush comes out, they play this shot of Trump saying in his New York drawl, “If this guy weren’t in gov’t no one would hire the guy.”

Bush comes out, and says, “Well, I’m not looking for a job working for Donald Trump.” and he talks about his job as governor.

Ok...he’s doing good.

Then he orders a BIIIIIIIIG breakfast...Ham and eggs etc.

AND DID I SEE THIS? DID ANYONE SEE THIS? HE PULLS OFF THE SIDES OF THE TOAST JUST TO EAT THE MIDDLE????????!!!!!!!!

I mean the guy goes from like scoring 8 9 and 10s only to pull the sides of the toast off, to eat the middle.

[Guenevere]

libbylu have you conveniently forgotten your ‘time out’ by Jim for using.....ahem.....angry words toward Freepers

[luvbach1]

You sure sound like Trump was a 2nd choice; oh, that’s right, a soft 2nd choice, very soft.

[palmer]

Trump has never fought for anyone but himself in his life.

True for the most part. He has given to others here and there but he takes full credit for that as well. The point you are missing is that Trump wants America to be great again. The rest of the candidates have no such vision.

[Fresh Wind]

I don't think Trump hired any homos.

That I wouldn't know. But he has hired lawyers.

[nclaurel]

It was something I wish Trump had not repeated but it certainly is something most people think about many candidates.

That word comes to mind every time I see the current occupant of the WH on his bike with his little helmet. Oh honestly I have said it to friends just seeing him anytime.

[FreedomForce]

Trump hired Roy Cohn, so he hired at least one gay lawyer. (Cohn died of AIDS back in the 80’s)

[ETL]

The point you are missing is that Trump wants America to be great again. The rest of the candidates have no such vision.

What the heck are you talking about? First of all, Trump has been all over the friggin map on his positions. Second, most of the others have good to excellent visions for undoing the damage caused by the current saboteur-in-chief. Cruz in particular has an excellent vision which he repeatedly spells out.

[Yorlik803]

I want a street fighter in the White House. I want someone who will take my country back.
yeah, someone who isn’t afraid to sic thugs on people who disagree with him. Someone who whips the crowd into a frenzy and god like admiration. Someone who promises much if but don’t offer any clear plans.
Maybe he can get a special squad of men to protect him. They can wear Brownshirts.

[Dagnabitt]

Just a formatting suggestion: You should lead with the girly whining and save the hysterical sobbing for your closing paragraph.

[palmer]

Trump wants protectionism, and Cruz does not. America became great as a protectionist country. Trump wants to stop us from turning into a third world hell hole. That is well underway, I have driven around the California barrios in my rental car. It is unbelievable.

It is not a matter of "undoing the damage". There is nothing that can be undone. No future president will get rid of a single department. The federal government will keep growing. The only thing we can do is try to change the culture back to capitalism and be successful and hope the masses come around and embrace that success.

As for the non-Trump candidates, I am glad that Trump is clearing a path for an outsider like Cruz. But none of them including Cruz want us to prosper. Cruz wants us to globalize even more. The problem with that is that Americans can't compete with slave laborers.

[Lopeover]

Don’t care that he cusses! Don’t care if he calls opponents bad names! Can’t wait for him to cuss & name call the people who are responsible for America’s decline! I will love it as he lashes the cheap labor express and globalists with words that they deserve!

[TermLimits4All]

Ahhhh too upset in your political correctness. How cute. If you want a President that isn’t an alpha male then Cruz is your guy I guess. My opinion is that Trump will be able to handle both the domestic issues and the foreign issues well. He’ll install the right people to ensure the job gets done, and done well.

Cruz will be able to get the internal stuff done probably. I have absolutely zero confidence in his immigration policy. He does have handlers and they are calling the shots on that one. He’s dancing around that subject whenever it is brought up. As for foreign policy, I think he’s another Obama and therefore I cannot vote for him. He would make a great Supreme Court Justice. I would prefer that over VP any day of the week. Ultimately he would better serve the USA in the Supreme Court.

[ETL]

none of them including Cruz want us to prosper.

Where do you get this crap from? Aren't you the guy who believes that so-called "man-made global warming" is a proven fact?

[jpsb]

[CIB-173RDABN]

These anti Trump post are getting tiresome.

The charges listed in the post may be true or not true, but when presented by someone with obvious bias, I do not bother to consider the level of truthfulness or not.

I do this when reading about people I like or don’t like. I discount many of the outrageous claims against the Clintons and Obama. I don’t doubt that both of the Clintons have done many of the things they are accused of, but rather than sticking to facts our side shows a lack of restraint and we become National Enquirer of blogs. Same goes for Obama, he has done many things I believe harmed our nation, which I hope some day he is held accountable for, but to many times he is accused with something based only on someone’s opinion rather than fact. We hurt our argument when this type of post over runs Free Republic.

I am now seeing the same with the “anti Trump” people who are quick to take anything out of context and then proclaim well now they will not support Trump, as if they ever did.

I am sadden that Free Republic is turning in to DU with the petty name calling, the flame wars, and all the hate being shown towards Freepers who disagree with each other.

Polictics is a rough business, but we need to remember at the end of the day, we are all on the same side. We all want the same thing. We can disagree on who best represent our views, but if we poison the well we all lose, and the socialist win by default.

One person’s opinion -

Flame away.