Posted on 01/02/2016 9:15:02 AM PST by Starman417
Hillary Clinton in cahoots with terrorists in order to win an election. It's a pretty interesting thought.
Ethics and the Clintons rarely intersect. That's a given.
It's well known that the Clintons are more than willing to take money from oppressive regimes:
The State Department formally approved ... arms sales even as many of the deals enhanced the military power of countries ruled by authoritarian regimes whose human rights abuses had been criticized by the department. Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar all donated to the Clinton Foundation and also gained State Department clearance to buy caches of American-made weapons even as the department singled them out for a range of alleged ills, from corruption to restrictions on civil liberties to violent crackdowns against political opponentsThe Clintons can be induced to abandon all principles when it comes to money:
Four oil-rich Arab nations, all with histories of philanthropy to United Nations and Middle Eastern causes, have donated vastly more money to the Clinton Foundation than they have to most other large private charities involved in the kinds of global work championed by the Clinton family.(emphasis added)Since 2001, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar and the United Arab Emirates gave as much as $40 million to the Clinton Foundation. In contrast, six similar non-governmental global charities collected no money from those same four Middle Eastern countries; the International Committee of the Red Cross was given $6.82 million. Since 2001, these global foundations have raised a staggering $40 billion to $50 billion to fund their humanitarian work.
The existence of foreign donors to the Clinton Foundation has been well-documented in the media. What hasn't been revealed, however, is the disparity in donations by these four nations, all of which have been criticized by the State Department over the years for a spate of issues ranging from the mistreatment of women to stoking ethnic discord in the flammable Middle East.
The Clintons have shown disdain for rules governing donations and for tax law as well. The Clintons failed to disclose a thousand donors to their Foundation.
The Clintons are resistant to ethics and unbound by laws and regulations. Nor are they above lying. In the democrat debate Hillary Clinton made the allegation that Donald Trump was being used as a recruiting tool in ISIS videos. It was determined to be false by many fact checking efforts. While Trump was not in any ISIS videos, Bill Clinton was- as the "fornicator."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fa1BXNdtIB8
Try finding that anywhere in the mainstream media.
Then out of nowhere, the Somali terrorist organization al-Shabaab releases a video featuring Donald Trump.
Sidebar: Know how I document how the media lies about what Trump actually said? Check it out.
MSN:
Trump, the billionaire developer, former reality TV star and Republican front runner, was shown in the 51-minute film making his December call for the United States to bar all Muslims from the country as his supporters cheered.AOL pompously posted this:
At the time, the political fact-checking website PolitiFact evaluated the claim, but could not find any evidence to support it. "We were unable to find any evidence to support this ... If ISIS was using Trump for recruitment videos, we would expect a frenzy of media coverage over it. We rate this claim False," the site wrote.As if al-Shabaab and ISIS were one and the same. (Hint- they're not) Anything in there about "temporary"? Nah.Trump tweeted last month, "Hillary Clinton lied when she said that 'ISIS is using video of Donald Trump as a recruiting tool.' This was fact checked by @FoxNews: FALSE."
(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...
It sure was Hillary’s idea. The terrorists know they will have it much better under Hillary than D. Trump.
The thing is...even if ISIS is using Trump for recruitment videos, what does that suggest? That we should stop trying to defeat ISIS?
Wouldn’t it draw a contrast between Trump and Obama and show that ISIS fears Trump?
Trump scares them.
Internet was searched when Hillary first said this and no Trump ISIS recruitment video was found....It was her idea if there is one now.
Not a Trump fan but I despise the bitch and her husband.
Also known as “pernicious promise of future event.”
Another ingenious move by Trump:
1. Hillary and the Democratic party, friends to terrorists, give them recruiting ideas.
2. ...demonstrates that Trump is hated by terrorists. Anyone hated by terrorists is generally OK with everyone else.
Liberals in Isis recruiting videos, not Trump!
http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/12/isis-video-clinton.png
http://www.redstate.com/uploads/2015/12/isis-video-obama.png
ISIS has no Navy, no boats, no ships, no submarines. They have no Air Force, no bombers, no jet fighters, no troop carriers or refueling planes. ISIS has no ballistic missiles, no scuds, no short range missiles. They have no Space Program, no satellites, no real time intelligence.
THE ONLY WEAPON SYSTEMS ISIS HAS THAT CAN KILL AMERICANS ARE THE OBAMA/CLINTON/JARRETT/LYNCH/ DHS SECY JEH JOHNSON + the TRAITORS & DEMOCRATS IN CONGRESS, WHO DEMAND WE ALLOW MUSLIMS TO IMMIGRATE TO AMERICA TO SLAUGHTER INNOCENT AMERICANS.
Then, they try to disarm us to make us more vulnerable.
Peaceful Islamic ISIS future Killers arriving in America including a new immigrant under the watch of Obama! (photo ABC News)
Exactly.
The late Anwar al-Awlaki introduces the Donald ...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qrdjsr8DDhc
Al-Awlaki died on September 30, 2011, aged 40. Cause of death was an AGM-114 Hellfire missile.
“[donors Hillary] ... Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Qatar all donated to the Clinton Foundation and also gained State Department clearance to buy caches of American-made weapons ...”
Related ...
Bill Clinton’s speaking fees... line up with actions his wife’s State Department took
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3378547/posts
I’m pretty sure that they were actually working FOR her when Ambassador Stevens was killed. Think about it:
The information on Ambassador’s Stevens movements was given to the terrorists by a State Department wonk.
Stevens had been arming ISIS in Syria at Obama (and Hillary’s) request. Hillary stood to be jailed for it (Obama was looking for a reason to throw her under the bus)
Finally, and in the last act, she actively prevented ANY military support to defend Stevens after a month of him begging for help.
She might not have pulled the trigger, but only because her weapon was the terrorists themselves.
Why do our diplomats have to cover their hair because of worries of someone else’s backward views ?
Great points.
Thanks Arthur Wildfire! March.
hillary Clinton, an advisor to ISIS. Since it’s her policies as Secretary of State that paved the way for ISIS, it just makes sense.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
