Skip to comments.
Peter Stuyvesant's rules for drinking responsibly (NYC opens historical records)
Bowery Boys ^
| December 3, 2014
Posted on 12/11/2014 5:04:01 AM PST by NYer
From A New and Accurate Map of the Entire New Netherland, engraving believed to be by Carolus Allard, courtesy the Department of Records
Over the Thanksgiving holiday, the New York City Department of Records just blew the minds of history geeks everywhere. They released the first batch of digitized documents from the first years of the city's existence, back when it was the Dutch colony of New Amsterdam.
You can find the first batch of released documents at the city's attractive new portal here.
This is the equivalent of pulling out old photo albums of you playing with birthday cake in your high chair. This first round of documents show "the early development of the City’s government: ordinances drawn from the Records of New Amsterdam for the period of 1647 to 1661, and their corresponding translations, maintained by the Municipal Archives and Municipal Library."
Don't speak Dutch? No problem. Translations of the old ordinance pages pop up as you peruse them, and there are 19th century historical translations included underneath.
Below: The Duke's Plan, drawn to celebrate the British take over of the Dutch property of New Amsterdam
This is the first round of documents provided by the Department of Records. Future updates will feature "early documents granting lands to settlers in Brooklyn and Queens, maps and other primary resources."
Peter's Rules For Drinking Responsibly
Among these pages are the first edicts made by new director-general Peter Stuyvesant and the Common Council, including a laundry list of new restrictions regarding drinking and selling alcohol in the chaotic settlement.
The documents note that New Amsterdam's excessive alcohol consumption "causes not only the neglect of honest handicraft and business, but also the debauching of the common man and the Company’s servants and what is still worse, of the young people from childhood up, who seeing the improper proceedings of their parents and imitating them leave the path of virtue and become disorderly."
And so the following list of edicts were laid down including rules on bar fights, drinking on Sunday and providing liquor to Indians:
1. "Henceforth no new taproom, tavern or inn shall be opened."
2. "The taverns, taprooms and inns, already established, may continue for at least four consecutive years, but in the meantime the owners shall be obliged to engage in some other honest business at this place."
3. "The tavern-keepers and tapsters are allowed to continue in their business for four years at least, but only on condition, that they shall not transfer their former occupation."
4. "The tavern keepers and tapsters shall henceforth not be allowed, to sell or give beer, wine, brandy or strong waters to Indians or provide them with it by intermediaries."
5. "To prevent all fighting and mishaps they shall daily report to the Officer, whether anybody has been hurt or wounded at their houses, under the penalty of forfeiting their business and a fine of one pound Flemish for every hour after the hurt or wound has been inflicted and been concealed by the tapster or tavern-keeper."
6. "The orders, heretofore published against unseasonable night tippling and intemperate drinking on the Sabbath, shall be obeyed by the tavern-keepers and tapsters with close attention."
7. "They shall be held, not to receive any beer or wine or distilled waters into their houses or cellars, directly or indirectly, before they have so reported at the office of the Receiver."
8. "Finally, all tavern-keepers and tapsters, who intend to continue in their occupation, shall eight days after the publication hereof present themselves in person and give their names to the Director General and Council and there solemnly promise, that they will faithfully obey what rules have been or may be made."een o
r may be made.... March 10, 1648.
Images from the Municipal Library, also available on the site archives.nyc
TOPICS: Food; History; Society
KEYWORDS: brooklyn; dietandcuisine; drinking; dutch; newamsterdam; newyorkcity; peterstuyvesant; queens
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
To: muir_redwoods
If people from Poland are called Poles, should we call people from Holland .Holes ?
To: jttpwalsh
My grandmother had a saying, "Take a Dutchman for what he means, not what he says."
I'm not sure if that was originally about a German or a Hollander. Probably the confusion arose in America from the English-speakers misunderstanding the German deutsch (pronounced "doitch") as "Dutch."
To: Einherjar
What if you’re from Pensacola? Never mind...
23
posted on
12/11/2014 3:17:23 PM PST
by
muir_redwoods
("He is a very shallow critic who cannot see an eternal rebel in the heart of a conservative." G.K .C)
To: Verginius Rufus
Never heard that saying, before, I’ll keep it in mind - thanks!
To: NYer; indcons; Chani; thefactor; blam; aculeus; ELS; Doctor Raoul; mainepatsfan; timpad; ...
Thanks for the post, NYer and the ping, thefactor.
Dirck Storm's map, 1662
The RevWar/Colonial History/General Washington ping list
25
posted on
12/11/2014 6:29:23 PM PST
by
Pharmboy
(Democrats lie because they must.)
To: NYer
26
posted on
12/11/2014 6:33:09 PM PST
by
morphing libertarian
(Defund , sue, impeach. Overturn Obamacare, amnesty.)
To: Hyman Roth
“Those crazy Dutch. But who cares. They gave us Van Halen.”
*APPLAUSE*
27
posted on
12/11/2014 7:07:28 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: NYer
Wow! I manage a Garden Center and each fall we sell a Hyacinth bulb named after this guy, Peter Stuyvesant.
Thanks for the History Lesson. :)
28
posted on
12/11/2014 7:09:13 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: jttpwalsh
The locals had a difficult time pronouncing it, so the just called them Dutch.
I’m German Deutsch.
‘Doyt-schah’? What’s so hard about that?
Lazy Government workers, even back then! ;)
29
posted on
12/11/2014 7:11:55 PM PST
by
Diana in Wisconsin
(I don't have 'Hobbies.' I'm developing a robust Post-Apocalyptic skill set...)
To: Diana in Wisconsin
Apparently so. Thanks for your reply!
To: NYer
For those who are interested in New Amsterdam’s history read, “The Island at the Center of the World” by Russell Shorto.
To: Diana in Wisconsin
That's a beauty!
32
posted on
12/12/2014 4:24:51 AM PST
by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: Diana in Wisconsin; Hyman Roth
Those crazy Dutch. But who cares. They gave us Van Halen. And our favorite country vet ...
Dr. Jan Pol
33
posted on
12/12/2014 4:28:39 AM PST
by
NYer
("You are a puff of smoke that appears briefly and then disappears." James 4:14)
To: NYer
Huh... 1648 was the year my great X 11 grandfather arrived in New Netherlands, to settle up north in what would become Albany. He was an indentured servant. I’m sure he went through New Amsterdam on the way.
34
posted on
12/12/2014 7:22:43 AM PST
by
AnalogReigns
(Real life is ANALOG...)
To: Billthedrill
Even old New York was once New Amsterdam,
Why they changed it I can't say
People just liked it better that way...To the vistors go the spoils -- and the naming rights. The Brits took over and nearly everybody lost their names. I'm referring to the Swedes who had to change the way that they passed names from parent to child. That goes for the dutch too.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-35 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson