Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

36% Believe Obama is Hiding Biographical Information
Sven Magnussen ^ | Jan 18, 2013 | Sven Magnussen

Posted on 01/19/2013 9:23:55 AM PST by ABrit

.....During the 2008 campaign, Obama admitted Lolo Soetoro was his step-father and he was in Indonesia in 1968 attending elementary school. Lolo Soetoro and Obama's mother, Stanley Ann Dunham-Soetoro, were married in Hawaii in 1965. Obama campaign supporters have consistently and repeatedly insisted Indonesian Law would not allow Obama to be adopted by Lolo Soetoro and he could not be naturalized as an Indonesian citizen because of his age. Furthermore, Obama supporters insist his Indonesian citizenship is irrelevant to his allegience to the United States as a natural born citizen of the United States.

Obama was not adopted in Indonesia. He was adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii in 1967. When the Soetoro adoption was finalized in 1967, Obama's original long form birth certificate was sealed by order of the Court and archived by the Hawaii Department of Health (HDOH). A sealed vital record is null and void for all future legal or administrative proceedings. In addition to sealing Obama's original long form birth certificate, the Court ordered a Certification of Live Birth (COLB) created and filed by the registrar of HDOH. Lolo Soetoro was listed as the paternal parent for Barry Soetoro for a live birth on August 4, 1961, Honolulu, HI and filed on August 8, 1961.....

(Excerpt) Read more at svenmagnussen.blogspot.co.uk ...


TOPICS: Conspiracy; Government; Politics; Reference
KEYWORDS: 2013polls; bho44; birther; naturalborncitizen; nbc; obama; obamafamily; obamasecrets; sven; usurper
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last
To: Venturer

Do not neglect that Arab/Muslim money is largely involved in USA media. The program to get a person such as Obama into the highest office as well as permeated throughout our government has been going on for a long time. I put John Brenan in this group going back to Reagan.


301 posted on 01/29/2013 11:31:01 PM PST by noinfringers2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
...and btw, I addressed my comment to Ladysforest after reading BOTH the links provided, and the comments to the blog. Did you?

If you read comments at the blog, then you read something I wrote at the time as to why this alleged manual does NOT pass the sniff test. I just told you the manual was dated AFTER Obama was born.

Doesn’t seem that way, for if you had, what I wrote about Mr Corsi wouldn’t have surprised you.

Considering how picky you get over the names Anna and Soebarkah, it's extremely surprising and out of character to be less picky over an alleged manual that is dated AFTER Obama was born and has not been proven to applicable to the procedures that would have or should have been used on Obama's alleged long-form birth certificate. The discovery of the manual is a little "too" convenient.

Is it getting so that an opinion isn’t acceptable any more?

No. No one said any opinion isn't "acceptable." I asked WHAT prompted the action suggested within the comment you made earlier.

302 posted on 01/29/2013 11:33:19 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 292 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
This document you provided, from the British National Archives Show Son Born To Obama Sr. in 1961 In Kenya


shows a birth date of Aug 4, 1961, the exact date of genuine birth certificate with Obama's right foot print on it.

You're trying to pass off the very document that links the ILLEGAL ALIEN IN CHIEF to his birth certificate.

Let me say again: Think about this.
Here's something to ponder. Now think about those facts,and statements.
The forgeries I'm aware of, are the three Birth Cretificate Barack Hussein Obama II has forged.
I don't trust evidence put forth by Obama supporters.
The disappearance of too much evidence on Obama is strong enough for me to know that he was born in Kenya.

Read INS DOC FOUND: U.S. CERTIFICATE ISSUED TO ONE EAST AFRICAN-BORN CHILD OF U.S. CITIZEN IN 1961!
The documents provided in that article are very damaging to Obama, and well worth your time.

Most of these early "supporters" of the ILLEGAL IMMIGRANT IN CHIEF were party to the Communists "spooks".
There's a great volume of history you have to go through to understand this, and it goes back to about 1850.

Read these three articles on one of my earlier post:


Now go back and read The Communist Takeover Of America - 45 Declared Goals.

Are you getting the depth of this Fabian Society takeover?

You wouldn't believe the information here

It's deep, it's ugly, and most people WILL NOT ... CAN NOT ... accept the truth.

Anybody recall a press release telling the masses about federal intelligence notes sent warning police about this cabal?





303 posted on 01/29/2013 11:45:54 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 296 | View Replies]

To: edge919; Ladysforest
...I asked WHAT prompted the action suggested within the comment you made earlier.

If you mean me writing to Ladysforest that Corsi could use a kick in the bum, I think SHE knows what I meant by that. The comment wasn't addressed to you.

304 posted on 01/30/2013 3:14:16 AM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

OH FOR GOODNESS SAKE!

No-one knows where that document came from. How dare you write:

“This document you provided, from the British National Archives Show Son Born To Obama Sr. in 1961 In Kenya.”

The document showed up in the two posts below in 2009.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2302840/posts?page=1

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/chat/2367084/posts?page=1


305 posted on 01/30/2013 3:22:29 AM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 303 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
You little Devil, you.
Don't you get tired of mudding up the waters, by trying to sell a real Obama document for a forgery?


306 posted on 01/30/2013 3:30:55 AM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks; Yosemitest

WND posted what they claim is an authentic Kenya 1961 birth certificate (not Obama’s) for comparison.

http://www.wnd.com/2009/08/106135/


307 posted on 01/30/2013 7:41:48 AM PST by 4Zoltan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 305 | View Replies]

To: edge919

I am the one that “conveniently” found that 1961 VSIM. Now, I know you are not implying that I played some deep game, because that would be rude and wrong.

Prior to contacting the CDC headquarters I contacted about 30 State Archivists to see if any copy existed in a State Archive - because Corsi had implied to have found his copy in the HI SA.

Turns out that prior to my contacting the CDC, Zullo and Corsi had, and that’s when Zullo had the extended go round with the same manager/director (as it turned out) that I contacted. She is the one that TOLD me the one she was sending me was the thing I was after. She was bitchy about it. I will state again that I do not think it likely that just a couple of race codes were changed 10 days after obama was born.

On page eleven of that manual it instructs that if race of one parent is omitted or unknown - code race of child the same as the race given of the other parent.
and
If the racial entry for both parents is omitted or unknown, code 1 WHITE.
Recall - THESE particular codes were NOT applied to the certificate forms in the offices at Honolulu. These federal codes were entered onto punchcards to later be compiled into summaries. The FEDERAL coders were looking at microfilms of the birth certificate forms, not the paper forms. The federal coding had nothing whatsoever to do with anything other than collecting statistical data/trends. It had no impact whatsoever as to what appeared on those birth certificates. Some codes likely paralleled ones used at the local level, but other than that these federal code books have zero impact on this topic.

The way Corsi was spinning this one would think that the feds first used (in ‘61) the code chart that The Daily Pen had up, then revised the manual - but only the race codes - ten days after obama was born, then revised the codes back to the way they were in 1968.

BUT the federal VSIM is completely unimportant really - because the coders never put those codes onto birth certificate forms, the federal coders were harvesting info from these certificates - not applying it.


308 posted on 01/30/2013 9:56:55 AM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
If that document should turn out to be genuine, there's only one child to whom it would apply, and that's a son of the kenyan student, who wasn't the father of zero...and as Stanley Ann Dunham wasn't the mother of the boy in the family group I posted earlier, that document is as usefull as teats on a bull imo.

Here's a sample document from the UK, the Kenyan format follows:

And as you can see, it's not a birth certificate unless there's a declaration and seal.

309 posted on 01/30/2013 1:22:32 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 306 | View Replies]

To: 4Zoltan

thanks, and is that the best they could do, I wonder? A miserable quality scan...in two pieces.


310 posted on 01/30/2013 1:34:24 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 307 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks

Read it for yourself.
It states: It is a CERTIFICATE OF BIRTH from the KENYA COLONY for Bartack Hussein Obama (item 2), male sex (item 3), father Barack Hussein Obama, Sr (item 4), mother Stanley Ann Dunham (item 5), born on Aug 4, 1961 in Coast Province General Hospital, Mombasa ( 2nd line of top box).

This document was filled out and sent to Great Britain (the United Kingdom).

Your sample document is not from the 1961 time frame, but a much later date.
311 posted on 01/30/2013 2:50:37 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 309 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest
You quite obviously did NOT read either of the links I provided, which show that the document has apparently been tampered with and was debunked. There's NO way you can now claim this is a genuine document OR that...

This document was filled out and sent to Great Britain (the United Kingdom).

The 'document' is quite clearly shown in the two posts from 2009 TO HAVE NO PROVENANCE. It's a curiousity, nothing more.

And the age of the UK sample has nothing to do with it, as a British colony, Kenyan documents would simply have followed the same format. The docs from England haven't changed for a hundred years or more.

312 posted on 01/30/2013 3:08:29 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: butterdezillion
Well, it's also possible under Hawaii law to have the brith facts changed at any time whatsoever based on the affidavit of Barry, or of his grandma; if the judge wanted to do so.

They'd only need to invoke this "law enforcement" clause to change the number on the record/certificate.

313 posted on 01/30/2013 6:52:24 PM PST by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 259 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

But they can’t really lawfully invoke that law, because it’s only allowable for people born in Hawaii, and HI law doesn’t allow them to presume that Obama was born in Hawaii. Whatever his real record there has on it, the record itself is not valid, or Onaka would have had to at least verify the gender.

So the combination of BC# alterations and Onaka’s verification to AZ SOS BEnnett tells us at least 2 things: They created a fabricated BC at the request of law enforcement, and the record they had before this fabricated one was made is not legally valid.


314 posted on 01/30/2013 8:04:01 PM PST by butterdezillion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 313 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
If you mean me writing to Ladysforest that Corsi could use a kick in the bum, I think SHE knows what I meant by that. The comment wasn't addressed to you.

It was posted for everyone to read, not as a private message. Either you can back it up or you can't. Why is this so tough to give a direct answer for??

315 posted on 01/30/2013 8:42:24 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 304 | View Replies]

To: Ladysforest
I am the one that “conveniently” found that 1961 VSIM. Now, I know you are not implying that I played some deep game, because that would be rude and wrong.

And if nothing else, you can use drama queen language like this to try to shield the "VSIM" from criticism. Let's drop that right now. This manual wasn't posted at any official government website, so all we have to go on is the word of a blogger. I take that for what it is. If there's an electronic trail to an independent party, then it might mean a little more. We do have census reports and natality reports available at independent, government websites which gives a somewhat greater degree of reliability to the historical accuracy and provenance of these manuals and documents. I pointed out then and I'll point out now that this alleged manual that you dug up does NOT jibe with other historical reports available from that time period. And, it's dated AFTER Obama was born, so it is virtually useless. We don't have to speculate whether codes would have changed with 10 days or 10 years. "Dr. Conspiracy" tried to run with some similar documentation, and I pointed out several errors that undermined his claims too, plus he intentionally mistated several facts. If you're really concerned about the facts, then focus on the facts instead of trying to have a pissing contest with Jerome Corsi.

316 posted on 01/30/2013 9:05:28 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies]

To: edge919

It’s not tough at all, I just can’t be bothered making explanations to you. Your tone and attitude stinks.


317 posted on 01/30/2013 9:11:13 PM PST by Fred Nerks (fair dinkum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 315 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
It’s not tough at all, I just can’t be bothered making explanations to you.

Yet you could be bothered to make several posts AVOIDING giving an explanation???

Your tone and attitude stinks.

Because I asked a simple question that you would rather be defensive and evasive about over several posts instead of giving a simple or thoughtful answer??

318 posted on 01/30/2013 9:29:25 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 317 | View Replies]

To: Fred Nerks
Nows there's a laughable statement if I every read one.
Your credibility is shot with that statement!
319 posted on 01/30/2013 9:50:33 PM PST by Yosemitest (It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Please.

You are what? A non. I have the electronic trail. I save everything. Just because YOU are too lazy and disinterested to actually do any real research yourself, don’t think you have some authority to dismiss real work done by others.

The material I have is genuine and can be verified by any American who chooses to do so.

Why don’t you do so?

Corsi and Zullo and I all have the same 61 VSIM. Try asking Corsi or better yet, Zullo. What? Why not?

I’m betting I have a couple more hours speaking with both of those fellows than you ever will. Corsi has cited my blog in his latest book, and linked my blog - after swiping material from me - over on WND. I’m not the only blogger he has done this to. He is like Orly in this way.

Nice he has a rabid supporter in you though. What benefit do you receive from being his Champion? Really - do a little REAL research for yourself, you will be enlightened.


320 posted on 01/30/2013 11:13:12 PM PST by Ladysforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 316 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 281-300301-320321-340341-357 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson