Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CARTOON: The Dawkins Delusion
Out of Order Blog ^ | 12-29-11 | Dale

Posted on 12/29/2011 1:01:09 PM PST by daletoons

Atheist militant Richard Dawkins has produced a children's book entitled "The Magic of Reality" and in doing so has joined the Millstone Swim and Dive Club. Spreading his venom for God to kids under the guise of Scientism is about as putrid as it gets. Children using simple God-given logic conclude the existence of a creator. It requires an abandonment of logic to attain self omniscience and declare there is no God. The materialist's faith in the escape hatch of "there just wasn't enough evidence for me" won't wash on judgement day. Here's a book idea: The ghost of Christopher Hitchens, Jacob Marley style, appears to Richard Dawkins and sets him straight. Dickey would probably make a hash of it, too bad Hitchens isn't still around to write it.



TOPICS: Humor; Religion; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: gagdadbob; onecosmosblog
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 521-523 next last
To: grey_whiskers; Muridae; GodGunsGuts; Fichori; tpanther; Gordon Greene; Ethan Clive Osgoode; ...

Love it.....

Thanks for the work.

I KNEW there was no reason to believe the inflated figure of 350,000.

Looks like the troll got caught lying big time.


261 posted on 12/31/2011 6:32:50 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 256 | View Replies]

To: metmom
The overwhelming majority of internet p*ssing matches can be reduced to a "bye" round by either

a) going to the link

b) finding original source documents

Typically people sound one another out, looking for easily exploited chinks in the armour (logical flaws, "previously solved problems" or statements which allow the judger to dismiss the other as some particular species of crank from within the judger's worldview); failing this, invariably the dispute goes to larger-scale definitions or claimed consequences of (usually still-unstated) "axioms" of each side; and thence to the "real" base issues. Depending on how things are done, people either "agree to disagree" or wander off, shaking their head disrespectfully, or revert to Calvin and Hobbes mode:

Cheers!

262 posted on 12/31/2011 6:52:02 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: Muridae; betty boop
"If you want I can go through it piece by piece and dissect it for specific fallacies, but I must ask that you don’t make me; it’s silly enough just at the first reading."

"Making" you go through it piece by piece?? How would I do that? No, that's your choice.

It might be edifying for interested parties reading this, to see your "point by point" refutations, however, since some don't think it's "silly" at all. Here's your opportunity to show us what you "know". (The "iron sharpens iron", thingy).

263 posted on 12/31/2011 6:53:00 AM PST by Matchett-PI ("One party will generally represent the envied, the other the envious. Guess which ones." ~GagdadBob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers
I think you just tried to throw a snowball at me......

Yes, you.

I also think you sound like this: Uck, uck, uck, uck. Ba goawk!

:-)

264 posted on 12/31/2011 7:00:07 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies]

To: Lakeshark
You know, it just struck me how much funnier the last panel would be if someone modified it to read "MOD" instead of "MOM"...

Cheers!

265 posted on 12/31/2011 7:13:21 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 264 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
In the end, you believe because you want to. I don’t want to. That’s really all it boils down to.

Polanyi observed that "Since the sceptic does not consider it rational to doubt what he himself believes, the advocacy of 'rational doubt' is merely the sceptic's way of advocating his own beliefs".
266 posted on 12/31/2011 7:20:46 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

That’s why it’s a logical fallacy.

It’s always ‘true’...


267 posted on 12/31/2011 7:25:34 AM PST by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: Muridae
"shall I highlight the arguments from incredulity like this one?"

Only if you believe that credulity is the superior position.

268 posted on 12/31/2011 7:28:19 AM PST by GourmetDan (Eccl 10:2 - The heart of the wise inclines to the right, but the heart of the fool to the left.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

FR, where Calvin is a mod.......

269 posted on 12/31/2011 7:38:45 AM PST by Lakeshark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]

Comment #270 Removed by Moderator

To: mdmathis6; metmom
That's right, no one knows the answers to the mysteries of the universe. Now here is something for you both to contemplate: it doesn't matter. I for one don't need to know how the universe began... if it began at all and hasn't simply always existed. Before you say that's impossible, remember, you believe God always existed. If anything can always exist, let it be the universe and you leave off these useless questions.

For me, there is no point in pondering such things anyway. It's a frivolous pastime, as are most forays into "spiritual" matters. Every bit as silly to me as druids pounding drums in the forest (or whatever it is that they do.)

I have no questions about life itself. Everything makes perfect sense to me just as it is. The questions that trouble people have very obvious answers, they just are not the answers people WANT. "Why do good people die of cancer?" For instance. Well, because cancer has nothing to do with your personality. "Why did that little boy have to die?" Well, he was in the street and a car came, and that's what happens. If you stop trying to posit a benevolent God, all your questions disappear.

About 15 years ago, I gave that a try: imagine what you think the world would be like with no gods, no devils, just the world spinning in black space, populated by creatures all trying to survive. Then I looked around and what I saw fit that perfectly.

So this notion that there are questions to be asked is purely the construct of a mind in revolt against reality. I do really think people would be much better off examining their lives for admittedly prosaic (but adult) issues like: how can I do my job better? Let's go over the budget again. Maybe I should clean my closet before I go shopping for something new.

Things like this are actually generally enough to fill a life if you're determined to live it as best you can. There are occasional moments of boredom, but we all have that. But escaping into fantasy lands is ultimately counter-productive, and a waste of time and energy.

271 posted on 12/31/2011 7:52:52 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
Polanyi observed that "Since the sceptic does not consider it rational to doubt what he himself believes, the advocacy of 'rational doubt' is merely the sceptic's way of advocating his own beliefs".

This sounds like the typical theist's semantic trick of trying to posit non-belief as a belief. Sort of like those chicks who chirp "Even not having an agenda is a kind of agenda." But being able to phrase it in such a way as to try and make it look like a belief system doesn't actually make it so.

272 posted on 12/31/2011 7:59:38 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 266 | View Replies]

To: Muridae
I suspect you are beginning to see why some people are not worth talking to. Some of them are obsessed with an issue that has nothing to do with this, but relate everything to their issue. I'm sure you can figure out who she is.

Others think they are quite the wag, and project a bright-eyed sort of naughty-boy persona that is not only creepy in men after a certain age, but is really a cover-up for a much more aggressive and angry face. These types will try very hard to needle you with insults. If you insult back, they run to the Mod. I'm sure you can see who I mean.

273 posted on 12/31/2011 8:05:21 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: Muridae; wintertime; grey_whiskers

(”>Genesis was written for a primitive people. It is not a metaphor. It is an attempt to accurately explain an event to people who have no vocabulary for it. “Dust” is a good choice of words, for something that we would call elements and atoms, and still not be metaphorical about it.

That just means it has no excuse for being blatantly wrong. Once more, there are quite a few inaccuracies and mistakes even assuming that it’s a necessarily simple tale for a primitive people.”)

If I may interject....
The term “Adam” has two meanings...”one who blushes” and “a deeper root meaning “red mud or red dust man”. That is important because iron oxide is the primary pigment in red dust....why is that important you might ask? What is the primary active element that allows human hemaglobin to function as it does?

The ancients knew God had made Man out of red dust but they couldn’t have known what modern science tells us; that the iron in that red pigmented dust was used in the formation of our blood, liver and blood forming systems!

And skeptics say there is no science to be found in the book of Genesis...the ancient prophets titter at us modern fools, chiding us even from 4000 years ago by stating...”The blood is the life of a man!”


274 posted on 12/31/2011 8:13:16 AM PST by mdmathis6 (Christ came not to make mankind into God but to put God into men!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
Before you say that's impossible, remember, you believe God always existed. If anything can always exist, let it be the universe and you leave off these useless questions.

Have you ever studied cosmology?

Because your statement that 'let it be the universe' runs counter to current scientific thinking.

You have just revealed that you are not willing to find the truth, but merely to cherry pick from whatever source as suits your comfort.

(In other words, don't look down your nose while claiming to be the standard bearer for wearing the mantle of science and reason, while at the same time feeling free to ignore the claims made by science when it suits your convenience.)

I have no questions about life itself. Everything makes perfect sense to me just as it is. The questions that trouble people have very obvious answers, they just are not the answers people WANT. "Why do good people die of cancer?" For instance. Well, because cancer has nothing to do with your personality. "Why did that little boy have to die?" Well, he was in the street and a car came, and that's what happens. If you stop trying to posit a benevolent God, all your questions disappear.

No, you've just buried the questions, or shifted them to another form; and agreed to just "take for granted" other matters which have troubled minds far greater than yours for millenia.

But those questions would probably make as much sense to you as the Navier-Stokes equations would make to my cat, so I won't befuddle your pretty little mind with it. Enjoy cleaning out your closets before you go shopping.

Oh, and don't forget to pick up your Ron Paul bumper sticker.

Cheers!

275 posted on 12/31/2011 8:14:26 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady
But being able to phrase it in such a way as to try and make it look like a belief system doesn't actually make it so.

You're in over your head, dear.

The belief system of the atheist is hidden amongst the axioms which he declares "self-evident" but for which he cannot muster the ontological proof he demands from his opponents.

Cheers!

276 posted on 12/31/2011 8:16:56 AM PST by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 272 | View Replies]

To: mdmathis6
I should add that I think CS Lewis had a wonderful imagination, and I enjoyed the Narnia books when I was a child. But neither he nor anyone else is going to lead me into his way of looking at the world. I already have a way of looking at the world, and it's much simpler. I'm a big fan of stripping away the unnecessary. Sure, those glittery stories are decorative, but really... it's rather like living your life in an opium haze of wonder. Satisfying perhaps, but built on delusion and fairy tales.

I mean... if it makes you happy, I guess, go for it. But to insist that your fantasies must be everyone's fantasies... that's where you mess up. Not all of us want that. Being an atheist doesn't make me a communist, or a satanist, or a socialist, or anything else. And trying to construct a persona and force it on me so I can be integrated into your starry inner world, that's what I object to. Well, that and the ever-simmering-under-the-surface threats of Hell. That constant childhood taunt of "you're gonna get it!" ... that's irritating... as I suspect it's meant to be.

277 posted on 12/31/2011 8:26:57 AM PST by A_perfect_lady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies]

To: A_perfect_lady

“About 15 years ago, I gave that a try: imagine what you think the world would be like with no gods, no devils, just the world spinning in black space, populated by creatures all trying to survive. Then I looked around and what I saw fit that perfectly.”

A personal question - (No problem if you don’t answer as it is personal but I’m curious):

Do you have children?


278 posted on 12/31/2011 8:26:57 AM PST by APatientMan (Pick a side)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 271 | View Replies]

To: daletoons

Muridae:

This account has been banned or suspended.

oops


279 posted on 12/31/2011 8:32:33 AM PST by eartrumpet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers; Admin Moderator

FOFLOL!!!

Too true.

The mod just might enjoy the laugh today......

AM, ping to post 262......


280 posted on 12/31/2011 8:34:54 AM PST by metmom (For freedom Christ has set us free; stand firm therefore & do not submit again to a yoke of slavery)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 265 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 241-260261-280281-300 ... 521-523 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson