Posted on 09/24/2010 11:31:46 AM PDT by patlin
proof positive that Obama was NOT a US citizen prior to & in 1968...Sept. 24, 2010
Dear Sen. Thune,
As a member of the Armed Forces Committee & member of the sub-committee on Personnel, I am imploring you to please take this seriously & take immediate action...
(Excerpt) Read more at constitutionallyspeaking.wordpress.com ...
Let me suggest - G. Sorus or BilderburgerGruppe or Davos or CFR-UN Agenda 21 or, well.... you should get the notion that you are un-informed....
Do some 9th grade homework and you will have your answer.
Its been ALL over the net and FR for at least 7+ years.
Here, I'll help you out -
http://www.newswithviews.com/ and ....
http://www.newswithviews.com/Cuddy/dennisA.htm and ....
http://www.brusselsjournal.com/ and ....
http://www.gatesofvienna.blogspot.com/ and ....
http://www.westernrifleshooter.blogspot.com/ and ....
the main coarse site
http://www.henrymakow.com/.
Oh and search on “Caroline Glick” or,
well I've done your homework so far (off the tip of my keyboard) so get a bit motivated.
It will be scary. It should scare the piss out of you !!
As you can see there a LOT of sites that will inform you as to my “fascinating world”, aka REALITY.
No, the mother of all October surprises would be if Soros and the Islamists made an electronic run on the bank which created a panic that collapsed the entire western economy.
If Bush and Co was threatened with that if they balked at the Soros-Islamist coup that put Obama in power, Bush would have chosen to let the free world economy survive.
Obama is hiding his BC because it is not legally valid. It was amended in 2006 and there is very good reason to believe it was only actually COMPLETED in 2006 with that amendment and is thus also late. Late and amended are both reasons that a BC would not be legally valid.
See http://butterdezillion.wordpress.com/2010/08/09/the-summary-cnn-doesnt-want-you-to-see/
Interestingly enough, OIP Paul Tsukiyama cited HRS 338-13 as the reason why the HDOH did not need to release all of Obama’s BC’s on file, along with any supporting documentation. That denial of access is an admission that those records existed. And his citation of 338-13 rather than the usual 338-18 when the BC alone was requested is VERY interesting - because 338-13 specifically says that disclosures have to be compliant with the requirements for the statutes governing LATE and AMENDED birth certificates specifically.
There are actually quite a few smoking guns, but nobody with a loud enough megaphone has been willing to take the story and run with it.
If this whole story had been a CSI episode it would have been finished a long time ago based on the evidence we already have.
Thanks. Be prepared; it’s sort of dry reading.
But I at least made the highlighting colorful. lol
Yes, there are dumm trolls who think they’re smart, and dumm trolls who suspect that they aren’t really as smart as they think they are.
Should be OIP Director Paul Tsukiyama.
How is it that so many trolls are the smartest person in the room always?
Dry that’s ok. I’ve got a tab open with it that I’ll read it at my leisure.
These are state department records, filled out and filed, official documents, that state he is not a citizen.
You can't get a signed confession with video and audio. I'm sorry, this is as good as it gets.
If this was Bush, answer honestly, would he be forced to explain this? At the least? You know the FBI would be taking his statements for impeachment.
I agree 100%. The next question is:
Is he here legally or illegally?
Oops - maybe that’s why he wants amnesty for illegals.
He is one.
Troll school graduates who have been successfully brainwashed. ;^)
“Obama is hiding his original birth certificate because it probably lists his birth name as “Barry Dunham”. Since Obama, Sr. was already married in Kenya and bigamy is illegal in the U.S., the birth certificate may have even listed Stanley Ann Dunham as “Single”.”
His mother filled for divorce from Obama Sr. The divorce papers are public record. She was married to him.
It takes a while to sink in that you screwed up.
So we need to give people time to reckon with the truth.
Anyone can move out of the country and renounce their citizenship, even a minor.
Heres a sample letter the State Department sends to minors who have renounced their citizenship with information about their rights as reach the age of majority ...
7 FAM EXHIBIT 1292
A SAMPLE LETTER TO ACCOMPANY CLN FOR
MINOR RENUNCIANTS
(CT:CON-285; 03-06-2009)
Post Letterhead
Date
Dear (NAME):
Every U.S. citizen has the right to renounce voluntarily and intentionally his or her citizenship, as you have done. Because this is a very serious decision with consequences that may not have been apparent to you at the time, the law gives persons like yourself who renounced under the age of 18 an opportunity to reevaluate your decision when you reach the age of 18.
Section 351(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S. Code
1483) allows you to reclaim your U.S. citizenship within 6 months after your 18th birthday. You are advised to make a note of the deadline to reclaim automatically your U.S. citizenship: the deadline is [insert date six months from 18th birthday.] You may do so by going to any U.S. embassy or consulate or passport acceptance facility, execute a passport application and take an oath of allegiance to the United States. Under this law, if you make such a claim, you will be considered as never having renounced your U.S. citizenship.
Just like the decision to renounce your citizenship, the decision to reclaim it is yours alone. No one, including the U.S. Government, any other government, or even your own family can make the decision for you. Please keep this in mind as you consider whether you may want to make a claim of citizenship once you become 18.
The U.S. Government and the Department of State do not wish to influence your decision. We just want to make sure that you know that you have the right to reconsider and take back this decision upon reaching the age of 18. Because this is a very important right that you retain, we ask that you keep this letter with your Certificate of Loss of Nationality should you wish to take advantage of this right when you reach the age of 18. The Department of State will also keep a complete record of your renunciation as well as this letter. Please remember that the period to automatically reclaim citizenship expires on [date].
If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact (NAME) at (phone number). You may also contact the U.S. Department of State, Office of American Citizens Services and Crisis Management at any time. That office can be reached at 202-647-5225.
Sincerely,
SIGNATURE OF CONSULAR OFFICER
TYPED NAME OF CONSULAR OFFICER
TITLE OF CONSULAR OFFICER
Here’s what eventually happen to them, though:
(I’d post the photo if I could, I should learn.)
Oops - can’t find it.
Metmom! Can you post the photo of the burning troll, pretty please?
He may escape with four years under his belt. He's not getting a fifth with this in the public domain.
Thank you Sven. The truth has escaped the clutches of the Chicago Cesspool. This will get bigger every day. The truth has a way of doing that once it is set free.
Obama’s been outed, MMM, MMM, MMM.
I sent this to LTC Lakin yesterday, just to make sure they have it. I like a fair fight.
I did read the fine print and it is pretty clear that you either did not read it or did not understand it.
It does NOT say that if a person renounces their citizenship you are supposed to write their name on page 2 and then strike it out.
It says that if they have renounced their citizenship you are supposed to cross out part of the statement on page 1.
Stanley Ann did not do this. So she was NOT trying to claim that Barack renounced his citizenship.
Not everyone was taught this. At my school we were taught that only a child born on U.S. soil of U.S. citizen parents could be President.
I suspect it was also the common understanding on this board until Obama was elected, which is why there was such an interest in seeing Bobby Jindal nominated.
Not a really widespread sentiment. Some of us are aware Jindal isn't eligible either. However, his children are eligible.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.