Replies

Stanley Ann could have excluded Barack without striking him from the application. Read the fine print. Persons on a Family passport who renounce are STRUCK.

I did read the fine print and it is pretty clear that you either did not read it or did not understand it.

It does NOT say that if a person renounces their citizenship you are supposed to write their name on page 2 and then strike it out.

It says that if they have renounced their citizenship you are supposed to cross out part of the statement on page 1.

Stanley Ann did not do this. So she was NOT trying to claim that Barack renounced his citizenship.

It does NOT say that if a person renounces their citizenship you are supposed to write their name on page 2 and then strike it out.

It says that if they have renounced their citizenship you are supposed to cross out part of the statement on page 1.

You better read it again. Here it is to make it easy...

In the second paragraph. “(if any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion which applies should be struck out...)”

The “any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions” is speaking about the statement above it (paragraph 1) on page 1 that covers everything on the renewal application to include Obama’s name on page 2, and not just for only page 1.

And again here it is from page 1 right and above the Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro signature. I put the words in bold and underlined them that you should get to understand.

In paragraph 1. "I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or document has), since acquiring Unites States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state; taken an oath of affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state...made a formal renunciation of nationality either in the United states or before..."