Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Attorney Taitz filed a NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Expedite authentication, MOTION for Issuance of Letters Rogatory for authenticity of Kenyan birth certificate filed by Plaintiff Alan Keyes PhD.
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/blog1/ (site has been the target of hackers, proceed with caution — John)
too bad it could not be say..... hmnnn..... 220 million?
An aside - there is obviously something there that he is hiding. I always favored the Kenyan argument as I was in Africa up until very, very recently. Having spent the last 4 years over there while the Obama phenomena was going on it became clear to me, that his Granny is correct. There are too many people over there who say that he was born in Kenya. Also , they had pictures all over there with him in his muslim garb! His winning was a huge celebration over there , “ that an African” should be the president of the US A!.
Another choice I like is that Soertaro adopted him and that he is in fact a citizen of Indonesia.
The jackass is hiding the truth.... whatever it be!
That position is not about hiding truth and lying to the people about your identity!
The Faulker probably has his horns, tail and trident in the closet at home along with his muslim identity.
I’m not a troll. I’ve been here lots a times but I don’t post much. I love to read what others are thinking.
I thought I’d post the date difference of Aug. 4 and Aug. 5 for information. Could actually be correct depending on the time of day.
I want Yomama go down. He’s a fraud and we all know it. Trouble is “We the People” apparently don’t have standing.
Also, this BC may be a fraud perpetrated to make us all look like fools. It’s best not to get our hopes up! Let the system take it course.
If it’s a real BC there’s plenty of data on it to verify it’s authenticity.
As I have said in previous posts, Kenya was in some degree of chaos in that period, and it’s not unreasonable to expect to see some level of inconsistency in their government’s functioning.
The original 1963 constitution, as it was posted here, does not contain the word “republic” as later versions do.
Some claim this is proof that this early 1964 document is a fake since Kenya wasn’t officially a republic at that time.
Others point out that they may have started to call themselves the Republic of Kenya well before Dec. 12, 1964. This is certainly possible, in my opinion, and understandable considering the fact that most of the other newly independent African nations called themselves republics.
Supposedly, according to WND, other documents from the Republic of Kenya exist that were issued prior to Dec. 12, 1964, but we haven’t seen any of them.
As far as I am concerned, nothing has been proven or disproven yet.
lol!
ping to 3101
I don’t know what it should look like - i was young in 61.
But I do know what a laser print looks like. So, I’m ignorant and just choosing to note that it looks like a laser print to me... not that it looks inappropriate or anachronistic... just an observation.
All I can say is UNRAVEL and I hope our congressmen are smart enough to get out of the way of this out of control locomotive. Otherwise they may just end up being the greasy spot in the middle of the road.
You have alot of power within, it is not physical force it is might, resolve, fortitude. Stay focused and use the true resources you have to fight it. Quit purchasing from advertisers that fund the beast, let them know why you will not purchase their products. Reclaim that is yours and quit giving it away.
On that Schmutz thing: This is a font that was designed to mimick a typewriter.
So, either this is a hoax, made on a computer but fashioned to look like it was typed on a 1960’s typewriter — or it is real and it WAS actually fashioned on a 1960’s typewriter.
That number 47044 is one hell of a “coincidence,” though. Right now I’m leaning toward hoax.
“I already suggested folks stop spinning their wheels on this particular issue till we find out more - either way, we just want to know the TRUTH!”
The truth is sometimes hard to discern, but I agree with you on the wheel spinning.
When, or if, this ever gets into court there will be plenty to discuss.
“5) Most damning of all, the font used is Schmutz, which was invented in 1995.”
Not true.
The Schmutz number 4 is open at the top and flares forward.
http://www.fonthaus.com/products/fonts/fontfind.cfm?search=Schmutz
The Underwood forms a closed triangle the same as on the form.
http://www.fonthaus.com/products/fonts/view.cfm/sku/VT10050
Bogus “proof”.
Reeks of either desperation of bad eyesight.
Not even close to “Schmutz”.
Many typewriters did not have a “0”. The user would use the “O”. Ditto for “1” and “l”.
That isn't the only conceivable reason for an 18 year old American girl and her family to want their child's record to show he was born in the United States instead of Africa. Especially if she never intended to have him in Africa in the first place.
Yeah that is BS. I got it too. Just ignore it, and it will put you through. I wonder if some lefty at Google did that on purpose.
While you can't dismiss it entirely, the Dominion of Kenya effectively ceased to exist in December 1963 and I suspect that in anticipation of the finalization of the independent federal government, local governments probably started printing up their official documents with "The Republic of Kenya" in January of 1964. We need to see some other documents from this period and see if they have the same titles.
How hard could that be to find?
would you feel better if the # was 666 ?
I think the # game is really stretching it
Oh for crying out loud.
That was quick. Talking points already?
Hmm, I posted my post before I read yours. Will need to examine this in more detail. No time now; bookmark for later.
What is Joseph Farah’s Twitter account?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.