Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $48,513
59%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 59%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: starttreaty

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Jon Voight says Barack Obama capable of destroying the US in lame duck session

    12/21/2010 4:27:47 AM PST · by Suvroc10 · 16 replies
    Examiner ^ | December 21, 2010 | Marc Schenker
    Jon Voight says Barack Obama capable of destroying the US in lame duck session. On last night’s Hannity on FNC, actor Jon Voight was asked by fill-in host Mark Steyn (Sean took off for Christmas early) about Obama’s Start Treaty ambitions. Sporting a new mustache, the actor showed a grasp of foreign policy knowledge that was far superior to that of all Democrats and liberals combined. His message to the American people was simple: Call your senators today and make certain that you put pressure on them not to vote yes on Obama’s Start Treaty and the underhanded way that...
  • Ten key Republican swing votes on Start Treaty with Russia

    12/20/2010 7:28:24 PM PST · by FR_addict · 26 replies
    DickMorris.com ^ | 12/20/2010 | Dick Morris
    Dear Friend, On Tuesday — tomorrow — the lame duck Senate will vote on ratifying the START treaty with Russia. It needs 67 votes and we must not let it pass!!! While maintaining parity in strategic nuclear weapons, it locks in a 10,000 to 200 Russian advantage in tactical nuclear weapons and bars the US from developing interceptor missiles as part of a shield against incoming warheads — whether Russian or Iranian or North Korean. Putin snookered Hillary and Obama and they are desperate to pass the treaty to appease the left. There are ten key Republican swing votes. Please...
  • Russia Warns Senate Not to Amend Arms Control Treaty

    12/20/2010 10:54:25 AM PST · by balls · 80 replies
    nyt ^ | December 20, 2010 | PETER BAKER
    WASHINGTON — Russia warned the United States Senate on Monday not to rewrite the new arms control treaty being debated on Capitol Hill as American lawmakers clashed about the politics of ratification in the waning days of the Congressional session. Republican critics of the treaty, known as New Start, offered more amendments to the treaty’s language on verification and launcher limits. But any change to the treaty text would require both countries to return to the negotiating table, and Moscow made it clear that senators had to accept the treaty or reject it as it is, without amendments. “I can...
  • START loses key GOP support--Senate Democrats say they still have votes to ratify treaty

    12/19/2010 6:04:16 PM PST · by jazusamo · 16 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | December 19, 2010 | Eli Lake
    Key Senate Republicans on Sunday announced that they do not support ratification of a U.S.-Russia arms control treaty, upsetting White House plans to win passage of the pact during the lame-duck session of the Senate. Despite these statements, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. and Senate Democratic leaders said they have the 67 votes needed to ratify the New Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START). On Sunday, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, Kentucky Republican, and Sen. Lindsey Graham, South Carolina Republican, said they will not be voting to approve the U.S.-Russia arms treaty in the final days of the 111th Congress....
  • Republicans dig in their heels on nuclear treaty as Dems push vote

    12/19/2010 11:38:03 AM PST · by onyx · 46 replies
    The Hill ^ | 12/19/10 10:08 AM ET | Alexander Bolton and Bridget Johnson
    Senate Majority Whip Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) predicted victory Sunday for the New START nuclear arms reduction treaty, but his Republican counterpart said that unless there are changes to the preamble he is "absolutely" voting no. "I think whether there are the votes to ratify depends on how much the Senate is jammed," Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) said on "Fox News Sunday," saying his "prediction is coming true" that other business including the DREAM Act and the omnibus had swallowed time senators needed "to do it adequately." Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell (Ky.) announced on Sunday morning that he would oppose...
  • GOP Senator to Dems: If you try to pass DADT, Republicans won't pass START

    12/17/2010 1:48:09 PM PST · by roses of sharon · 42 replies
    UPDATE, 4:11 p.m.: In an interview with me just now, Senator Bob Corker doubled down on his contention that if Dems move on DADT, Republicans will be less likely to support START. "I felt like momentum was growing for START," Corker said, adding that since Reid announced he was holding votes on DADT and DREAM, it has had a "chilling effect." "I'm watching support for the treaty erode, because of highly partisan political issues being brought up solely because activist groups in the Democratic Party want this done," he continued. Corker said he wasn't issuing a personal threat, and was...
  • Governor Palin: Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START;Update

    12/17/2010 11:43:47 AM PST · by American Dream 246 · 14 replies · 2+ views
    conservatives4palin ^ | 12/17/10 | Whitney Pitcher
    Governor Palin writes the following piece at the National Review: "The proposed New START agreement should be evaluated by the only criteria that matters for a treaty: Is it in America’s interest? I am convinced this treaty is not. It should not be rammed through in the lame duck session using behind the scenes deal-making reminiscent of the tactics used in the health care debate. New START actually requires the U.S. to reduce our nuclear weapons and allows the Russians to increase theirs. This is one-sided and makes no strategic sense. New START’s verification regime is weaker than the treaty...
  • [Sarah Palin]Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START

    12/17/2010 12:14:45 PM PST · by onyx · 50 replies
    NRO - The Corner ^ | December 17, 2010 12:13 P.M. | Sarah Palin
    The proposed New START agreement should be evaluated by the only criteria that matters for a treaty: Is it in America’s interest?  I am convinced this treaty is not.  It should not be rammed through in the lame duck session using behind the scenes deal-making reminiscent of the tactics used in the health care debate.  New START actually requires the U.S. to reduce our nuclear weapons and allows the Russians to increase theirs.  This is one-sided and makes no strategic sense.  New START’s verification regime is weaker than the treaty it replaces, making it harder for us to detect Russian cheating.  Since we now know...
  • Senate Republicans: Vote No on New START (Sarah Palin)

    12/17/2010 10:52:07 AM PST · by Bigtigermike · 11 replies · 2+ views
    National Review ^ | December 17, 2010 | Sarah Palin
    De-link Missile Defense; Defeat New START by Sarah Palin...... The proposed New START agreement should be evaluated by the only criteria that matters for a treaty: Is it in America’s interest? I am convinced this treaty is not. It should not be rammed through in the lame duck session using behind the scenes deal-making reminiscent of the tactics used in the health care debate. New START actually requires the U.S. to reduce our nuclear weapons and allows the Russians to increase theirs. This is one-sided and makes no strategic sense. New START’s verification regime is weaker than the treaty it...
  • DeMint Says More Time Needed to Debate START; Admin. Notes He Missed 7/12 Foreign Relations Hearings

    12/16/2010 9:03:05 AM PST · by Qbert · 24 replies · 1+ views
    ABC News- Political Punch ^ | 12/15/2010 | Jake Tapper & Matt Jaffe
    Frustrated with Sen. Jim DeMint’s support for a move to require an oral reading of the START nuclear disarmament treaty with Russia – a move that could take as long as 12-15 hours in these waning lame duck days -- an Obama administration official notes that DeMint only attended five of the 12 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings on START, nor was he present for the final vote to order the treaty reported on the 16th. DeMint attended the May 18 and 19, June 15 and 24, and July 14 Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings, plus the Committee markup session...
  • DeMint will force readings of START Treaty and omnibus bill

    12/15/2010 9:30:51 AM PST · by Qbert · 68 replies · 2+ views
    The Hill ^ | 12/15/2010 | Michael O'Brien
    Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) will force readings of both a nuclear arms treaty and $1.1 trillion spending bill that could eat up hours of the remaining lame-duck Congress. DeMint will invoke a senatorial privilege to ask that texts of both the New START Treaty and the 2011 omnibus spending bill be read aloud on the Senate floor. The readings could take seven to 12 hours to verbalize the START Treaty, while the omnibus could take 40 to 60 hours, according to a spokesman for DeMint. The readings could eat up a substantial amount of time in the closing days of...
  • Obama may delay start of his Christmas vacation

    12/13/2010 1:21:46 PM PST · by Red Steel · 40 replies · 1+ views
    whtc ^ | Monday December 13, 2010 8 minutes ago | Alister Bull
    WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Barack Obama is likely to delay the start of his Christmas vacation to help several of his key legislative goals pass Congress before the end of the year, the White House said on Monday. Obama is tentatively scheduled to depart on Saturday for Hawaii, where the family traditionally spends its year-end vacation. But lawmakers are still debating the extension of Bush-era tax cuts and a new nuclear weapons deal, both of which Obama is eager to see approved. "The president will be here for as long as Congress is here," said White House spokesman Robert Gibbs,...
  • DO SENATORS KNOW? TOP DOWN, BOTTOM UP AND INSIDE OUT

    12/10/2010 5:27:40 PM PST · by Whenifhow · 6 replies · 1+ views
    NoisyRoom.net ^ | 12-10-2010 | AJ
    Liberals are ratcheting up their calls for Revolution. It’s time we send a letter like this to all Senators: Dear Senator, We hope you are aware that Community Organizers are openly discussing the need to riot – to “govern from below.” Their rallying cries espouse violence, as evidenced in their media interviews and university organizations and most troubling is the divisive rhetoric we’ve heard from President Obama (e.g. “punish our enemies”). CNBC reported that the Pentagon is strategizing for a potential uprising and military training for civil unrest is well under way. Those closest to the President – union leaders,...
  • Likely GOP Hopefuls Line Up Against Nuclear Treaty

    12/09/2010 6:44:23 AM PST · by Mozilla · 3 replies
    Newsmax ^ | 12/09/10 | staff
    Republicans weighing a White House bid fiercely oppose a new nuclear arms treaty with Russia and stand in stark contrast to two presidents, Democrat Barack Obama and Republican George H.W. Bush, on a critical foreign policy issue. "It's an obsolete approach that's a holdover from the Cold War and a bilateral treaty without taking into account multilateral threats," former House Speaker Newt Gingrich said Wednesday, becoming the latest potential 2012 candidate to object to swift passage of the treaty without changes. Gingrich joins Mitt Romney, Tim Pawlenty, John Thune and Sarah Palin — all outspoken critics of the pact. The...
  • Jon Kyl: No time left for START

    12/09/2010 12:59:46 AM PST · by Red Steel · 4 replies
    Politico ^ | 12/8/10 3:43 PM EST | JEN DIMASCIO
    With Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid pressing for quick ratification of the New START treaty, Sen. Jon Kyl (R-Ariz.) reiterated again on Wednesday there wasn’t enough time left in this lame-duck session of Congress to consider it. Kyl — who’s been holding out for more money to modernize the nation’s nuclear research labs, among other things — met with Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.), chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, but there was no public signal of progress afterward. “There’s a lot going on,” Kerry told reporters after the meeting in Kyl’s Capitol office. “We’re trying to make sure that...
  • W/VIDEO: Obama’s New START Treaty – Incompetent or Intentional and Arrogant?

    12/07/2010 8:41:52 PM PST · by damonw · 9 replies
    Even for a man known for his arrogance, Barack Obama’s treatment of the Senate in connection with the New START Treaty is astounding. His demand that Senators approve this defective accord during the few days remaining in the lame-duck session amounts to contempt of Congress. It must not be tolerated, let alone rewarded. To be sure, Mr. Obama is not the first chief executive to hold the legislative branch in low esteem. Still, his highhandedness when it comes to the constitutional responsibility of the Senate to play a real role in treaty-making seems particularly contemptuous, and contemptible.
  • A Really Bad Start

    12/03/2010 7:37:40 AM PST · by bsaunders · 1 replies · 1+ views
    Beyond the Cusp ^ | December 3, 2010 | B. Saunders
    President Obama has claimed that the Start nuclear disarmament treaty that he negotiated with the Russians is a solid treaty in the best interest of the United States. I would have to question the validity of this claim as the White House is pushing the lame duck Senate to quickly ratify the Start Treaty without the usual in depth studies usually given treaties with such deep and far reaching consequences. Sometime these consequences will not be realized for years, possibly decades, well after the time that changes or precautions could have better prepared and addressed the affects on our national...
  • Senator Jon Kyl, Congressman Rob Wittman, CD for the Troops IV and Voyage of the Dawn Treader

    12/02/2010 9:13:55 PM PST · by c-five · 1 replies
    Hewitt Blog ^ | December 02, 2010 | Hugh Hewitt
    ... HH: Can you give us the status on what the Republican position is, you’re the whip, you’re the number two guy in the Republican caucus, vis-a-vis the Bush tax rates, and vis-a-vis START? ... HH: Senator Kyl, the Democrats are trying to throw some smoke in the air on this by saying let’s let the tax hikes go through for people making more than a million a year. Is that on the table in the eyes of anyone in the Republican caucus, that so-called compromise? JK: No. HH: All right. In terms of the Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell repeal,...
  • The Republican case for ratifying New START

    12/02/2010 11:21:07 AM PST · by mojito · 38 replies · 1+ views
    WaPo ^ | 12/2/2010 | Henry A. Kissinger, George P. Shultz, James A. Baker III, Lawrence S. Eagleburger & Colin L. Powell
    Republican presidents have long led the crucial fight to protect the United States against nuclear dangers. That is why Presidents Richard Nixon, Ronald Reagan and George H.W. Bush negotiated the SALT I, START I and START II agreements. It is why President George W. Bush negotiated the Moscow Treaty. All four recognized that reducing the number of nuclear arms in an open, verifiable manner would reduce the risk of nuclear catastrophe and increase the stability of America's relationship with the Soviet Union and, later, the Russian Federation. The world is safer today because of the decades-long effort to reduce its...
  • Dems Try to Muscle Jews into Backing Russian Treaty

    12/01/2010 8:45:14 AM PST · by Nachum · 8 replies
    Commentary Magazine ^ | 12/1/10 | Jonathan S. Tobin
    The call by Democratic senators Chuck Schumer and Carl Levin for AIPAC to back passage of the stalled START treaty with Russia speaks volumes about the growing desperation of both the White House and its Senate allies. The administration is reportedly going all-out to push Jewish groups to lobby for the treaty, but it is unlikely that AIPAC will succumb to the pressure. The group has been scrupulous about sticking to its agenda of working only on behalf of Israel-related issues, a policy that keeps it strictly neutral on arms control measures like START.