Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $11,664
14%  
Woo hoo!! And our first 14% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: spyoncongress

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Mark Kirk to Holder: Tell the truth, has the DOJ been harvesting Congress’s phone records too?

    06/07/2013 5:09:57 AM PDT · by chessplayer · 17 replies
    Via Joel Gehrke, I won’t spoil the surprise of Holder’s answer. I’ll simply amend something that I said last night on Twitter: After this exchange, we may be only two or three more scandals away from this guy’s job being in trouble. At another point in today’s hearing, he said he won’t resign because there are still lots of “goals” he has as AG — which, given the news of the last few weeks, may be the single most terrifying soundbite to come out of Scandalmania. To cleanse your palate after you watch, read this short but pungent Onion piece...
  • Eric Holder Refuses To Answer If DOJ Monitored Phones for Members of Congress

    06/06/2013 12:55:00 PM PDT · by Nachum · 48 replies
    Youtube ^ | 6/6/13 | goprapidresponse·
    Published on Jun 6, 2013 Eric Holder Refuses To Answer If DOJ Monitored Phones for Members of Congress (June 6, 2013)
  • LIVE THREAD: AG Holder Appears Before Senate Appropriations Subcmte. 10:45 am

    06/06/2013 7:32:30 AM PDT · by don-o · 76 replies
    CSpan ^ | June 6, 2013
    Attorney Gen. Eric Holder testifies before a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the Justice Department's FY2014 budget. He also discusses the seizure of Associated Press phone records and the IRS targeting conservative groups for investigation.
  • Kirk to Holder: Is DOJ spying on Congress? (& SCOTUS?)

    06/06/2013 9:34:44 AM PDT · by PghBaldy · 186 replies
    Washington Examiner ^ | June 6 | Joel Gehrke
    “With all due respect, Senator, I don’t think this is an appropriate setting for me to discuss [this issue],” Holder replied during a Senate Appropriations Subcommittee hearing when Sen. Mark Kirk, R-Ill., asked if the executive branch was conducting surveillance that would give “unique leverage” over lawmakers. Kirk replied that “the correct answer would be no, we stayed within our lane, and we did not spy on Members of Congress.” Holder assured Kirk that “there is no intention to do anything of that nature — that is, to spy on Members of Congress or to spy on the Supreme Court.”