Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $18,771
23%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 23%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: scotusillegals

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Supreme Court: Immigrants Who Lie to Feds to Become Citizens May Lose Citizenship

    06/24/2017 11:32:02 AM PDT · by Cheerio · 28 replies
    Breitbart ^ | 24 Jun 2017 | Ken Klukowski
    WASHINGTON—The Supreme Court on Thursday held that federal law authorizes courts to strip immigrant citizens of their U.S. citizenship if they obtained it as a result of making false statements to the federal government. Federal law found at 18 U.S.C. § 1425(a) makes it a crime to “knowingly procur[e], contrary to law, the naturalization of any person” to become a U.S. citizen. (“Naturalization” is the legal term for becoming a citizen.) Moreover, a second federal statute, 8 U.S.C. § 1451(e) adds that a foreigner who obtains U.S. citizenship through such a violation will lose that newly granted citizenship. Divna Maslenjak...
  • Chief Justice Roberts uses Obama’s words against him on immigration case

    04/18/2016 12:13:57 PM PDT · by jazusamo · 58 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | April 18, 2016 | Stephen Dinan
    Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. prodded the Obama administration Monday to explain President Obama’s immigration flip-flop, when Mr. Obama in 2014 reversed himself and decided he did, after all, have powers to grant a tentative amnesty to as many as 5 million illegal immigrants. Mr. Obama had repeatedly denied he had that kind of power, then after the 2014 election, when Congress refused to act on his policies, the president claimed a do-over and said he did have the power. Chief Justice Roberts wondered what changed in Mr. Obama’s mind, and even read back one of Mr. Obama’s quotes...
  • Supreme Court split on Obama amnesty; Kennedy: Policy ‘just upside-down’

    04/18/2016 10:40:25 AM PDT · by jazusamo · 68 replies
    The Washington Times ^ | April 18, 2016 | Stephen Dinan
    The Supreme Court divided deeply Monday over President Obama’s deportation amnesty, with conservative justices saying the White House was trying to steal Congress’s law-making powers, and liberal justices suggesting the court should stay out of the fight altogether, leaving the president with a free hand. Outside the court, thousands of Hispanic-rights protesters rallied, demanding legal status from the courts and vowing political retribution on Congress — and Republicans in particular — if Mr. Obama loses his case. Inside the courtroom, however, the argument was lower-key, with the justices sparring with lawyers over the tricky interplay between the law, federal regulations...