Home· Settings· Breaking · FrontPage · Extended · Editorial · Activism · News

Prayer  PrayerRequest  SCOTUS  ProLife  BangList  Aliens  HomosexualAgenda  GlobalWarming  Corruption  Taxes  Congress  Fraud  MediaBias  GovtAbuse  Tyranny  Obama  Biden  Elections  POLLS  Debates  TRUMP  TalkRadio  FreeperBookClub  HTMLSandbox  FReeperEd  FReepathon  CopyrightList  Copyright/DMCA Notice 

Monthly Donors · Dollar-a-Day Donors · 300 Club Donors

Click the Donate button to donate by credit card to FR:

or by or by mail to: Free Republic, LLC - PO Box 9771 - Fresno, CA 93794
Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $18,941
23%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 23%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: rankfile

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Am I the Only One Who is Getting Tired of Hannity and Others Making Disclaimer

    02/05/2018 6:20:25 PM PST · by murron · 79 replies
    2-5-2008 | Me
    That they're not talking about Rank & File FBI agents?
  • Democrats "Dig Dean" - (party ops should dig him a 6 ft. hole, but are chasing their tails!)

    07/01/2005 9:19:44 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 11 replies · 383+ views
    FOX NEWS.COM ^ | JULY 1, 2005 | Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
    Capitol Hill Democrats may be saying that the chairman of the Democratic National Committee doesn't speak for them, but Democratic activists and rank-and-file members outside the Beltway say they are happy with Dean's no-nonsense approach. "People outside Washington, D.C., love Howard Dean. He raises money for state parties, he sends money to state parties and he's attacking Republicans. That's what the chair of the party is," said Bob Mulholland (search), a campaign adviser to the California Democratic Party and one of the DNC members who in February voted for the former Vermont governor and 2004 presidential hopeful to become chairman....
  • Don't Place Stock In Big Labor - (they hire fund mgrs who are anti-S.S. reform)

    04/13/2005 5:48:33 PM PDT · by CHARLITE · 1 replies · 184+ views
    HERITAGE.ORG ^ | APRIL 14, 2005 | DAVID C. JOHN
    Some organized labor groups recently decided that the retirement security of their members was less important than their own short-term political goals. The AFL-CIO and some of its member unions declared that investment managers for their retirement funds should be chosen based on their position on Social Security reform, not on what is best for current and future retirees. Labor is signaling that it would rather employ a bad fund manager (if he agrees with it politically) than a good funds manager (if he does not). If this happens, it’ll be union members and retirees who lose, not the AFL-CIO...