Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $21,146
26%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 26%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: progressiveincometax

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • High Tax Rates Aren’t Optimal

    01/09/2019 6:46:10 AM PST · by reaganaut1 · 12 replies
    Wall Street Journal ^ | January 8, 2019 | Holman W. Jenkins, Jr.
    ... A large and growing literature continues to support the claim that high marginal tax rates and big tax hikes are harmful to economic well-being. See the work of the Dallas Fed’s Karel Mertens and colleagues, or the Romers’ own 2010 work finding a “highly contractionary” effect from postwar tax hikes. The theoretical cases for towering “optimal” tax rates that Mr. Krugman cites always tend to trip up over political realities if nothing else. Politicians may find it politically handy to be seen dinging the rich, but they also find it useful to placate the rich by dishing out loopholes....
  • The Rich Can't Pay for ObamaCare

    03/30/2010 7:35:12 AM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 10 replies · 1,172+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | March 30, 2010 | Alan Reynolds
    President Barack Obama's new health-care legislation aims to raise $210 billion over 10 years to pay for the extensive new entitlements. How? By slapping a 3.8% "Medicare tax" on interest and rental income, dividends and capital gains of couples earning more than $250,000, or singles with more than $200,000. The president also hopes to raise $364 billion over 10 years from the same taxpayers by raising the top two tax rates to 36%-39.6% from 33%-35%, plus another $105 billion by raising the tax on dividends and capital gains to 20% from 15%, and another $500 billion by capping and phasing...
  • Record Number of Tax Filers Paid No Federal Income Taxes in 2008

    03/14/2010 6:30:16 AM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 40 replies · 1,520+ views
    Tax Foundation ^ | March 10, 2010
    A record number of the 142 million tax returns filed in 2008 resulted in no tax payment, according to a Tax Foundation analysis of IRS data. That means the tax filers got back every dollar that had been withheld from their paychecks, and often more. Roughly 51.6 million tax returns, or 36.3 percent, were filed by such "nonpayers," people whose exemptions, deductions and credits wiped out any federal income tax due. A family of four earning more than $50,000 can have no income tax liability after taking the standard deduction and the child tax credit. "Two records were set in...
  • Tax Fairness Reaches A Tipping Point

    03/16/2010 5:16:23 PM PDT · by Kaslin · 26 replies · 1,200+ views
    Investors.com ^ | March 16, 2010 | INVESTORS BUSINESS DAILY Staff
    Fiscal Policy: The latest data show a record number of people with no tax obligation. We also have the highest-earning nontaxpayers ever. With more riding the wagon and fewer pulling, it should soon break down. A record number of the 142 million tax returns filed in 2008 resulted in no taxes owed, according to the Tax Foundation's analysis of the latest IRS data. About 51.6 million returns, or 36.3%, were filed by those whose deductions, exemptions and tax credits wiped out any federal income-tax obligation. These aren't people who have overpaid their taxes or had so much withheld from their...
  • Tax Increase for the Rich Is at Issue in Oregon (money already spent)

    01/23/2010 3:36:35 PM PST · by reaganaut1 · 11 replies · 812+ views
    New York Times ^ | January 23, 2010 | William Yardley
    ... On Tuesday, voters here and across Oregon will have the chance to make that happen when they decide the fate of two ballot measures that would raise taxes on higher-income residents and on businesses to help pay for public education and other services. Known as Measures 66 and 67, the votes are referendums on $727 million in tax and fee increases that were approved last year by the Democratic-controlled Legislature. ... Opponents say the proposals are the wrong fix at the wrong time. State income taxes for wealthier Oregon residents are already among the highest of any state. But...
  • Study Calculates Economic Cost of Higher Tax Rates, Health Care Surtax

    08/22/2009 5:44:48 AM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 10 replies · 519+ views
    Tax Foundation ^ | August 14, 2009
    The actual economic costs of the proposed health care surtax and the expiration of the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts will be twice the amount of revenue the government intends to collect. According to a new analysis from the Tax Foundation, the higher tax rates are estimated to raise $88 billion in 2011, but the economy will incur an additional burden of $76 billion—or "deadweight loss"—as a result, which raises the total cost of the tax increases to $164 billion, roughly double what lawmakers intend to raise. Tax Foundation Special Report No. 170, "The Excess Burden of Taxes and the...
  • Obama Budget, Health Care Surtax Will Shrink Federal Income Tax Base

    08/08/2009 2:12:23 PM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 11 replies · 957+ views
    Tax Foundation ^ | July 29, 2009
    With the expiration of the Bush tax cuts and the implementation of a proposed health care surtax, in 2011 the top federal individual income tax rate will rise to more than 46% and over 50% for those living in many states. This sharp increase in tax rates can be expected to reduce the size of the tax base and may raise substantially less revenue than the casual observer might think—perhaps only 60 cents on the dollar. In Tax Foundation Fiscal Fact No. 182, "The Economic Cost of High Tax Rates," Senior Fellow Robert Carroll explains that for every 1% decrease...
  • Income Tax Payment of Top 1% of Filers Exceeds that of Bottom 95%

    08/08/2009 2:20:07 PM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 12 replies · 832+ views
    Tax Foundation ^ | July 30, 2009
    The top 1 percent of tax filers earned about 22.8 percent of the nation's income in 2007 (the latest IRS data available), and paid 40.4 percent of all federal income taxes - more than the bottom 95 percent of tax filers combined, according to a Tax Foundation analysis of just-released IRS data. Both income and income tax shares for the top 1 percent of tax returns (AGI over $410,096) hit all-time highs in 2007. In Fiscal Fact No. 183, "Summary of Latest Federal Individual Income Tax Data," Tax Foundation Senior Economist Gerald Prante notes that the record-setting trend for income...
  • Millionaires Go Missing -- Maryland's fleeced taxpayers fight back (leave)

    05/26/2009 5:20:28 AM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 127 replies · 5,593+ views
    Wall Street Journal ^ | May 26, 2009
    ... Maryland couldn't balance its budget last year, so the state tried to close the shortfall by fleecing the wealthy. Politicians in Annapolis created a millionaire tax bracket, raising the top marginal income-tax rate to 6.25%. And because cities such as Baltimore and Bethesda also impose income taxes, the state-local tax rate can go as high as 9.45%. Governor Martin O'Malley, a dedicated class warrior, declared that these richest 0.3% of filers were "willing and able to pay their fair share." The Baltimore Sun predicted the rich would "grin and bear it." One year later, nobody's grinning. One-third of the...
  • Richly Undeserved

    04/11/2009 5:44:12 AM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 9 replies · 778+ views
    New York Times ^ | April 10, 2009 | David Leonhardt
    [Obama's] agenda is a bold one in many ways. Yet his tax code would still look more kindly on wealth than Nixon’s, Kennedy’s, Eisenhower’s or that of any other president from F.D.R. to Carter. And only part of the reason for this is widely understood. It’s well known that tax rates on top incomes used to be far higher than they are today. The top marginal rate hovered around 90 percent in the 1940s, ’50s and early ’60s. Reagan ultimately reduced it to 28 percent, and it is now 35 percent. Obama would raise it to 39.6 percent, where it...
  • So What's in the Stimulus for You? Nothing!

    03/08/2009 2:45:24 PM PDT · by reaganaut1 · 34 replies · 1,773+ views
    Forbes ^ | March 16, 2009 | Janet Novack
    The $787 billion stimulus includes temporary tax breaks for workers, college students and car and home buyers, but all are denied to higher-income folks. That's because of what's known as phaseouts--the long tradition of curtailing tax breaks as income rises. Democrats had an excuse for denying the temporary tax cuts to rich folks: They're less likely to spend the extra cash and, anyway, President Barack Obama campaigned on tax cuts for couples earning up to $150,000. But phaseouts aren't just a Democratic game. For years, points out Clint Stretch, managing principal of tax policy at Deloitte Tax, politicians from both...