Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $12,224
15%  
Woo hoo!! And our first 15% is in!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: privacyright

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Trying to be Optimistic Post King Vs Kentucky Reasons to be optimistic

    05/17/2011 6:38:53 AM PDT · by Gus221 · 15 replies
    Los Angeles Times ^ | 05-17-2011 | David G. Savage, Washington Bureau
    Reporting from Washington— The Supreme Court gave police more leeway to break into homes or apartments in search of illegal drugs when they suspect the evidence otherwise might be destroyed. Ruling in a Kentucky case Monday, the justices said that officers who smell marijuana and loudly knock on the door may break in if they hear sounds that suggest the residents are scurrying to hide the drugs. Residents who "attempt to destroy evidence have only themselves to blame" when police burst in, said Justice Samuel A. Alito Jr. for an 8-1 majority. http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-court-search-20110517,0,6746878.story
  • No Clause for Celebration (Flush that commerce, it's the Feds!)

    06/10/2005 4:17:33 PM PDT · by Wolfie · 11 replies · 681+ views
    Reason Magazine ^ | June 10, 2005 | Jacob Sullum
    No Clause for Celebration USA -- In its recent decision upholding the federal government's authority to pluck marijuana from the hands of desperately ill people who use it as a medicine, the U.S. Supreme Court noted in passing that "most domestic drug regulations prior to 1970 generally came in the guise of revenue laws." That's a puzzling fact if, as the Court now insists, the power to "regulate Commerce...among the several States" includes the power to ban certain plants and their products from backyards and dresser drawers throughout the nation. As the Court explained, the Marihuana Tax Act of 1937...