Free Republic 4th Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $1,022
1%  
Woo hoo!! 4th qtr FReepathon is now underway!! Thank you everyone!! God bless.

Keyword: leftistjudiciary

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Alberta Judge Rules Explicit Sex Talk to Children is Legal

    04/03/2006 4:35:37 PM PDT · by wagglebee · 21 replies · 772+ views
    LifeSiteNews ^ | 4/3/06 | Gudrun Schultz
    EDMONTON, Alberta, April 3, 2006 (LifeSiteNews.com) – An Alberta judge has ruled that adults can legally have obscene sexual conversations with children, so long as they don’t try to meet the child. Justice John Agrios acquitted a 32-year-old man of the charge of Internet luring on Friday, saying the explicit sexual chatting he carried on with a 12-year-old Ontario girl in 2003 was not illegal because he did not arrange a meeting with the girl. The accused, Christopher Legare, said he didn’t intend to meet the girl, although he talked to her about having sex and called her parents’ home.“The...
  • Dobson blasts 'frightening' court ruling

    11/12/2005 11:34:21 AM PST · by wagglebee · 46 replies · 1,322+ views
    WorldNetDaily ^ | 11/12/05 | WorldNetDaily
    A federal appeals court's dismissal of a lawsuit by parents outraged that a school district surveyed their elementary school-age children about sex is "frightening," says family advocate James Dobson. "I think that's one of the most frightening examples of judicial tyranny that has come down," said Dobson, founder and head of Focus on the Family, on his daily radio broadcast. Dobson called the 9th Circuit "the most out-of-control, imperious, unelected, unaccountable court in the country." The court determined there is "no fundamental right of parents to be the exclusive provider of information regarding sexual matters to their children." "What parents...
  • Searching for accurate information in sex education (Great Read!)

    06/06/2005 8:35:07 AM PDT · by wagglebee · 20 replies · 619+ views
    Townhall.com ^ | 6/6/05 | Diana West
    Last month, a federal judge found the Montgomery County School Board's sex-education pilot plan in Maryland so flagrantly in violation of the First Amendment that he had to hand down a restraining order. (Either that or hand in his gavel forever.) With the sex-ed plan's legal route blocked, the school board ditched the whole idea for now, along with the citizens committee that waved it through in the first place, despite plenty of flapping red flags. OK, there were two really big red flags. Judge Alexander Williams Jr. called one "viewpoint discrimination" because, as he wrote, the new curriculum for...