Free Republic 2nd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $81,084
100%
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 99%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: kinsley

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • The Lying Game - NYT Kinsley Nutter Barf Alert

    07/05/2007 6:06:53 AM PDT · by Loud Mime · 18 replies · 857+ views
    New York Times ^ | 07/05/2007 | Michael Kinsley
    WHEN the Republicans in Congress impeached President Bill Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair, they insisted that it wasn’t about sex, it was about lying. Of course that wasn’t true. Even at the height of their power-mad self-delusions (when Newt Gingrich was conducting his own affair with an aide while prosecuting the president), Republicans realized that to make lying an impeachable offense was opening a door no politician should eagerly walk through.
  • It's Not Apartheid. Jimmy Carter's moronic new book about Israel.

    12/12/2006 5:46:54 AM PST · by .cnI redruM · 44 replies · 1,137+ views
    Slate.com ^ | Posted Monday, Dec. 11, 2006, at 9:03 PM ET | By Michael Kinsley
    >>>>> Comes now former President Jimmy Carter with a new best-selling book, Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid. It's not clear what he means by using the loaded word apartheid, since the book makes no attempt to explain it, but the only reasonable interpretation is that Carter is comparing Israel to the former white racist government of South Africa. That is a foolish and unfair comparison, unworthy of the man who won—and deserved—the Nobel Peace Prize for bringing Israel and Egypt together in the Camp David Accords, and who has lent such luster to the imaginary office of former president. I mean,...
  • Sins of the Father

    12/06/2006 10:41:29 AM PST · by altura · 37 replies · 1,444+ views
    The Washington Post ^ | December 5, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    It is not the fault of Jenna or Barbara Bush that their father, the president, has gotten us into a war that he doesn't know how to get us out of. And, although you can blame parents for almost anything, George W. and Laura Bush are no longer responsible for the behavior of their twin daughters, who are in their mid-20s. Presidents, like the rest of us, don't get to choose their relatives. Remember Billy Carter? Anyway, Jenna and Barbara are far from George W. Bush's biggest familial problem. The law of averages has given him at least one ne'er-do-well...
  • Hannity on Michael Kinsley

    11/07/2006 1:34:43 PM PST · by Binstence · 8 replies · 425+ views
    11-06-06 | LiveFreepOrDIe
    Did anyone hear Hannity talking with Tony Snow? Snow and Hannity mentioned Micheal Kinsley op ed and I cannot find it. Anyone have a link?
  • Michael Kinsley's True Dilemma of Embryonic Stem Research

    07/22/2006 10:54:09 AM PDT · by Quiet Man Jr. · 9 replies · 519+ views
    MichNews.com ^ | July 14, 2006 | Nathanel Blake
    He is, however, correct in noting that "that if embryos are human beings with full human rights, fertility clinics are death camps -- with a side order of cold-blooded eugenics. No one who truly believes in the humanity of embryos could possibly think otherwise." This, of course, leads into the question of what human lives should be protected. The embryos destroyed for stem cell research or IVF are living members of the human species. Mr. Kinsley doesn't deny this, but rather than parsing the logic of which human beings are not worthy of human rights, he makes emotional appeals, writing...
  • Yes, It Really Is Brain Surgery

    07/17/2006 1:05:19 PM PDT · by twntaipan · 15 replies · 686+ views
    Time ^ | July 16, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    Like NASA before the first moon landing, I have been soliciting advice about what to say when I wake up from brain surgery. That's right, brain surgery—it's a real conversation stopper, isn't it? There aren't many things you can say these days that retain their shock value, but that is one of them. "So, Mike—got any summer plans?" "Why, yes, next Tuesday I'm having brain surgery. How about you?" In the age of angioplasty and Lipitor, even the heart has lost much of its metaphorical power, at least in the medical context. People are willing to accept it as a...
  • The Twilight of Objectivity (Kinsley Alert)

    03/31/2006 7:16:36 AM PST · by abb · 9 replies · 524+ views
    Slate ^ | March 31, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    CNN says it is just thrilled by the transformation of Lou Dobbs—formerly a mild-mannered news anchor noted for his palsy-walsy interviews with corporate CEOs—into a raving populist xenophobe. Ratings are up. It's like watching one of those "makeover" shows that turn nerds into fops or bathrooms into ballrooms. According to the New York Times, this demonstrates "that what works in cable television news is not an objective analysis of the day's events," but "a specific point of view on a sizzling-hot topic." Nicholas Lemann, dean of Columbia Journalism School, made the same point in a recent New Yorker profile of...
  • So, the Prophet Mohammed walks into a bar …

    02/12/2006 8:18:51 PM PST · by Lorianne · 7 replies · 321+ views
    Slate ^ | Feb. 10, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    Ayatollah Ali Khamanei, the noted wit, expert on freedom, and unelected religious leader—the leader who counts—of Iran, observed the other day that in the West, "casting doubt or negating the genocide of the Jews is banned but insulting the beliefs of 1.5 billion Muslims is allowed." He apparently thought this was a devastating point. Touché, Ayatollah Khamanei. The worldwide fuss over 12 cartoon images of the Prophet Mohammed (some mocking, some benign) that ran in a Danish newspaper has already killed at least 10 people. Many self-styled voices of Islam have made the bizarre comparison between showing pictures of the...
  • Kick Me, I'm a Democrat (sniff, sniff, have Kleenex handy)

    01/30/2006 12:09:50 AM PST · by Lorianne · 71 replies · 1,760+ views
    Slate ^ | Jan. 29, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    It seems to be time once again to play Kick the Democrats. Everyone can play, including Democrats. The rules are simple. When Republicans lose elections, it is because they didn't get enough votes. When Democrats lose elections, it is because they have lost their principles and lost their way. Or they have kept their principles, which is an even worse mistake. Democrats represent no one who is not actually waiting in line for a latte at a Starbucks within 150 yards of the east or west coastline. They are mired in trivial lifestyle issues like, oh, abortion and gay rights...
  • Extra! Extra! The future of newspapers.

    01/07/2006 1:27:01 AM PST · by Lorianne · 40 replies · 1,020+ views
    Slate ^ | Jan. 7, 2006 | Michael Kinsley
    Bill Gates says that in technology things that are supposed to happen in less than five years usually take longer than expected, while things that are supposed to happen in more than 10 years usually come sooner than expected. Ten years ago, when I went to work for Microsoft, the newspaper industry was in a panic over something called Sidewalk—a now-forgotten Microsoft project to create Web site entertainment guides for a couple dozen big cities. Newspapers were convinced that Microsoft could and would put them out of business by stealing their ad base. It didn't happen. The collapse of the...
  • What Abortion Debate? Why there is no honesty about Roe.

    11/18/2005 9:06:21 PM PST · by Lorianne · 6 replies · 558+ views
    Slate ^ | 18 November 2005 | Michael Kinsley
    In a 1986 case called Bowers v. Hardwick, the Supreme Court ruled that state laws against homosexual sodomy do not violate the U.S. Constitution. In a 2003 case called Lawrence v. Texas, the court ruled that on second thought, anti-gay-sodomy laws do violate the Constitution. Liberal politicians cheered this rare and unexpected admission of error by the court. They did not express any alarm about the danger of overturning precedents. Plessy v. Ferguson, upholding racial segregation, was a major precedent when the court overturned it and ended formal racial segregation with Brown v. Board of Education in 1954. Liberals did...
  • Who Loves Freedom More?

    11/14/2005 4:10:16 PM PST · by Lorianne · 8 replies · 441+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 11 November 2005 | Michael Kinsley
    LONDON -- Two countries. One has a Constitution with a Bill of Rights. These documents limit the power of the elected branches. They cannot be repealed or easily amended. Although neither one says so explicitly, there is a rock-hard tradition that the courts, and not the legislature or the executive, have the final say over their interpretation. No elected official would claim more authority than the Supreme Court in interpreting the Constitution. Put it all together and an individual citizen can feel pretty secure against the tyranny of the majority or a runaway government. Or so we suppose. The other...
  • What's Too Conservative?

    11/14/2005 4:28:01 PM PST · by Lorianne · 14 replies · 560+ views
    Washington Post ^ | November 4, 2005 | Michael Kinsley
    The Democrats have declared war on President Bush's latest Supreme Court candidate, Samuel Alito, without much in the way of weapons. Only two, really: the filibuster and the power of persuasion. And the filibuster -- because it seems (and is) unfair and anti-democratic -- will backfire unless people are convinced that it is saving them from something really bad. And to make the challenge even more daunting, most of the usual tools of persuasion aren't available this time. Alito seems like a fine fellow, personally. His credentials and qualifications are beyond dispute. Unlike Robert Bork, he is not scary-looking. And...
  • How Conservative Is "Too Conservative"?

    11/04/2005 6:04:25 AM PST · by paudio · 36 replies · 1,018+ views
    slate.com ^ | Friday, Nov. 4, 2005 | Michael Kinsley
    The Democrats have declared war on President Bush's latest Supreme Court candidate, Samuel Alito, without much in the way of weapons. Only two, really: the filibuster and the power of persuasion. And the filibuster—because it seems (and is) unfair and anti-democratic—will backfire unless people are persuaded that it is saving them from something really bad. And to make the challenge even more daunting, most of the usual tools of persuasion aren't available this time. Alito seems like a fine fellow, personally. His credentials and qualifications are beyond dispute. Unlike Robert Bork, he is not scary-looking. And another Anita Hill is...
  • Michael Kinsley resigns from Los Angeles Times

    09/13/2005 5:49:41 PM PDT · by BurbankKarl · 61 replies · 1,988+ views
    SF Gate ^ | 9/13/05 | (AP) --
    Former political commentator and columnist Michael Kinsley has resigned as editorial and opinion editor of the Los Angeles Times after 15 months at the paper. Andres Martinez, hired by Kinsley last September from The New York Times to be editorial page editor, will take on a broader role overseeing the Times' opinion pages, publisher Jeffrey M. Johnson announced Tuesday. Kinsley, 54, said in an interview with The New York Times in July that his arrangement to commute to his job from his home in Seattle had become a problem and that he was in discussions to change his role at...
  • CNN PRODUCERS TOLD ON-AIR GUESTS: GET ANGRY (Drudge)

    09/12/2005 9:45:17 AM PDT · by slowhand520 · 139 replies · 7,270+ views
    CNN PRODUCERS TOLD ON-AIR GUESTS:Ê GET ANGRY Mon Sep 12 2005 12:42:11 ET After weeks of over-the-top Katrina coverage from the mainstream media, LA TIMES'S oped guru Michael Kinsley divulges that CNN has been coaching guests to artificially enhance their on-air emotions! The TV news networks, which only a few months ago were piously suppressing emotional fireworks by their pundits, are now piously encouraging their news anchors to break out of the emotional straitjackets and express outrage. A Los Angeles Times colleague of mine, appearing on CNN last week to talk about Katrina, was told by a producer to "get...
  • Kinsley Expected to Lose Top Edit Page Post, But Remain at 'L.A. Times'

    07/28/2005 12:28:25 PM PDT · by churchillbuff · 18 replies · 706+ views
    editor and publisher ^ | July 28 05 | editor and publisher
    The Los Angeles Times' Michael Kinsley is currently in negotiations to change jobs, a move that will likely end his brief but eventful tenure as the paper's editorial and opinion-page editor. Although details of his new position have yet to be finalized, Kinsley is expected to remain at the paper as a columnist and may handle some Web site duties, according to a source at the Times and a report in Tuesday's New York Times. John Carroll, the outgoing editor of the paper who had originally hired Kinsley away from Slate, told E&P Monday he did not know about Kinsley's...
  • In Praise of Bush's Honesty (Honest)

    05/03/2005 5:29:56 AM PDT · by FlyLow · 2 replies · 470+ views
    JWR ^ | 5-3-05 | Michael Kinsley
    Q: Is the poll troubling? PRESIDENT BUSH: Polls? You know, if a president tries to govern based upon polls, you're kind of like a dog chasing your tail. I don't think you can make good, sound decisions based upon polls. And I don't think the American people want a president who relies upon polls and focus groups to make decisions for the American people. — from the April 28 news conference. The comic high point of the president's prime-time news conference was this muddled disquisition on how the American people don't want the president to do what polls say the...
  • The Neocons' Unabashed Reversal

    04/18/2005 6:29:47 AM PDT · by Valin · 23 replies · 814+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 4/17/05 | Michael Kinsley
    The term "neoconservative" started out as an insult and is still used that way. When people say that the selection of Paul Wolfowitz to head the World Bank marks the triumph of neocons in Bush administration foreign policy, they are generally not indicating pleasure. Cynics say they are indicating anti-Semitism: A neocon is a Jewish intellectual you disagree with. That's way too harsh. But what does neoconservative mean? Writing in the current issue of the National Interest, Rich Lowry, a conservative of the non-neo variety, defines a neocon as someone with a "messianic vision" of using American power to spread...
  • Democratic Superiority, by the Numbers

    04/04/2005 4:41:54 PM PDT · by Coleus · 22 replies · 801+ views
    Washington Post ^ | 04.03.05 | Michael Kinsley
    It was the TV talker Chris Matthews, who first labeled Democrats and Republicans the "Mommy Party" and the "Daddy Party." Archaic as these stereotypes may be, they do capture general attitudes about the two parties. But we live in the age of the one-parent family, and it is Mom more often than Dad who must play both roles. It has not escaped notice that the Daddy Party has been fiscally misbehaving. But it hasn't really sunk in how completely Republicans have abandoned allegedly Republican values -- if in fact they ever really had such values. Our text today is the...