Free Republic

The complaint filed in Pennsylvania by the Trump campaign is a superb piece of legal craftsmanship. It was filed in federal court, not state.  The gist is that some of the state's actions, and particularly the exclusion of Republican poll-watchers during the counting of hundreds of thousands of mail-in ballots, violated federal constitutional requirements. The point is obvious enough once one thinks of it, but it's brilliant all the same.  It shifts the focus from state law, where a politicized Pennsylvania court has the last word, to federal law, where the U.S. Supreme Court rules. As for the obviousness of the...

The purpose of FreeRepublic.com's multiple message boards is to limit the topics for each board to particular topics. Posting the same message on all the boards defeats the purpose of multiple-boards for special topics. It is very annoying to see the same message on every bulletin board. PLEASE! DO THE READERS A FAVOR. STOP CROSS-POSTING YOUR MESSAGES!

Judges have taken over the law. With the help of legislators who are also members of the BAR Assn., they have literally revised nearly every legal definition to suit the political and personal agenda of individuals. Our Constitution, and the foundations of our very liberty are at stake. The concept of allowing total immunity, such that even the most egregious and outrageous judicial dicatator is allowed, is unconscionable. To have to address a board of the judges' peers or even subordinates, to address a grievance or present a malfeasance case is ridiculous. They simply close ranks, no matter HOW badly...