Numerous red flags which call the IPCC's whole conclusion into question were uncovered when critiquing the science behind the global warming theory. Among them was the IPCC 's definition of detection and attribution with respect to man's influence on his environment. First, they stipulate that true, scientifically valid attribution of man to the warming of the planet would actually require pouring various greenhouse gases, in various concentrations, in controlled experiments, over varying time frames into the atmosphere , and that this approach is --strictly speaking-- practically impossible. This, many of us knew already. Next, they acknowledged that natural climate variability...