Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2025 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $42,285
52%  
Woo hoo!! And now only $645 to reach 53%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Keyword: doctrine

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • Theological FAQs: What is the Gospel?

    01/20/2010 4:18:43 AM PST · by Gamecock · 8 replies · 209+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    The gospel is not something man made up or a well-informed opinion, but is good news directly revealed from Almighty God regarding what He has done in Jesus Christ to rescue all those who have called on His name. The Gospel is the news that Jesus Christ, the Eternal Son of God, the Righteous One, died for our sins and rose again for our justification, eternally triumphing over all his enemies, so that there is now no condemnation for those who believe. It is a declaration about what He has done, not what what we are to do. It is...
  • Theological FAQ: What does the term “analogy of faith mean?

    01/19/2010 3:23:01 AM PST · by Gamecock · 9 replies · 265+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    The “analogy of faith” is a reformed hermeneutical principle which states that, since all scriptures are harmoniously united with no essential contradictions, therefore, every proposed interpretation of any passage must be compared with what the other parts of the bible teach. In other words, the “faith,” or body of doctrine, which the scriptures as a whole proclaim will not be contradicted in any way by any passage. Therefore, if two or three different interpretations of a verse are equally possible, any interpretation that contradicts the clear teaching of any other scriptures must be ruled out from the beginning. Another related...
  • Theological FAQ: Is a grammatical-historical hermeneutic opposed to sensus plenior?

    01/18/2010 12:56:55 AM PST · by Gamecock · 18 replies · 450+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    Although it is a common sentiment today to deny that a literal, grammatical-historical hermeneutic could allow for any sensus plenior in the text of scriptures, because it would violate the principle of each text having only one meaning, the simple fact is that this understanding is based more upon a naturalistic, or literalizing hermeneutic, than the grammatical-historical hermeneutic of the Church Fathers and Reformers. But more to the point, this denial of sensus plenior is in direct contradiction to the testimony of the scriptures themselves, as to how they should be read and understood. Throughout the Old Testament, the bible...
  • Calling All Christians: Honest skeptic wants to know where to tithe. (VANITY)

    01/15/2010 1:50:03 PM PST · by ROTB · 56 replies · 972+ views
    Me | 1/15/2010 | Me
    Brothers and Sisters In Christ - In my locale, there is a public place where street preaching goes on we have some regular hecklers who show up to ... make things more interesting. One of them has softened up over the years. He used to be somewhat contemptuous of Jesus, but now though still an agnostic, speaks well of Christ and Christians. He is tithing, wanting to see God reveal himself per Malachi 3:10. Question: What biblical standards exist for God to bless him abundantly in an obvious way? He wants to be sure he is not making a mistake...
  • Theological FAQ: What does the term “sensus plenior” mean?

    01/14/2010 1:57:26 PM PST · by Gamecock · 6 replies · 226+ views
    CPRG ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    “Sensus plenior” is a Latin term which means, literally, “fuller sense,” or “deeper meaning”. The term “sensus plenior” is used to refer to those passages which, at their most obvious level speak of one person or event, but which also have a deeper meaning hinted at through that specific event in question. In other words, “sensus plenior” is the term which acknowledges that some historical persons and events in the Old Testament are really “types,” and that the passages treating of those persons and events speak not just of themselves alone, but also of the “antitypes” (i.e., the fulfillments of...
  • Theological FAQs: Wasn't the Old Testament written especially to the Jews.......

    01/13/2010 9:55:01 AM PST · by Gamecock · 14 replies · 519+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    Full Title: Wasn't the Old Testament written especially to the Jews, so that it doesn't apply in the same way to Christians? The Old Testament was written particularly to the Jews, whom God called out from all the nations to be his special people (e.g. Deuteronomy 7:6); and so, Paul speaks of the privilege of the Jews as being very great, and consisting most especially in this, that they were given the oracles of God (Romans 3:1-2). Elsewhere, Paul consistently speaks of the Jews as having a definite temporal priority in God's redemptive design (just as Christ had taught before...
  • Theological FAQ: Isn't it reading too much into the O. T. to see references to Christ on every page?

    01/12/2010 1:24:04 PM PST · by Gamecock · 45 replies · 689+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    Full Title: Isn't it reading too much into the Old Testament to see references to Christ on every page? The fact that the message of Christ crucified and exalted is whispered on every page of the Old Testament is argued for throughout the New Testament, and may be clearly discerned in how the first apostles interpreted and applied various Old Testament passages in their sermons and writings (e.g. Acts 2:22-36; 15:12-21; 1 Cor. 10:1-13, to name but a very few). A good exemplary passage would be Hebrews 8:5, which refers to the Old Testament tabernacle and priestly duties as “types...
  • Theological FAQ: Is the whole bible about Christ, or just the New Testament?

    01/11/2010 12:00:38 PM PST · by Gamecock · 26 replies · 737+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    According to the New Testament, and to Christ himself, the entire corpus of Old Testament scriptures teach of Christ in every part; thus, Jesus rebukes the Pharisees for failing to see him in the Old Testament (John 5:39-40); he calls his own disciples fools and slow of heart not to see how, from the first books of Moses to the last of the prophets, the Old Testament taught of Christ's passion and victorious ascension (Luke 24:25-27); and then, he opens their hearts to understand that everything in the Law, Psalms, and Prophets (shorthand for the entire Old Testament scriptures) taught...
  • Theological FAQ: Is a “grammatical-historical hermeneutic”... “Christ-centered hermeneutic”?

    01/10/2010 5:23:25 AM PST · by Gamecock · 2 replies · 273+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    FULL TITLE: Is a “grammatical-historical hermeneutic” different from a “Christ-centered hermeneutic”? According to Martin Luther, who led the return to a grammatical-historical hermeneutic, there was no difference whatsoever between that and the “hermeneutic of Christ”; in fact, his grammatical-historical hermeneutic was, in his own words, simply the interpretation that “drives home Christ”. Or, as he elsewhere expressed it, “He who would read the Bible must simply take heed that he does not err, for the Scripture may permit itself to be stretched and led, but let no one lead it according to his own inclinations but let him lead it...
  • Theological FAQ: What does the term “grammatical-historical hermeneutic” mean......

    01/09/2010 12:47:23 PM PST · by Gamecock · 11 replies · 462+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    Full Title: Theological FAQ: What does the term “grammatical-historical hermeneutic” mean, and why is it important? In 1515 AD, Martin Luther rejected the elaborate four-fold hermeneutic that had been predominant throughout the Medieval centuries, and which led to some very far-fetched allegorizing of the bible, leaving scriptural interpretation in the hands of the experts, who alone were capable of figuring out the secret things that bible passages really meant. This would eventually lead to the great Protestant Reformation, which is therefore, most fundamentally, a hermeneutically-driven struggle. In place of this allegorical hermeneutic, Luther proposed what he termed a “grammatical-historical” hermeneutic....
  • Theological Q&A: What principles of interpretation are necessary to study the bible?

    01/08/2010 9:41:32 AM PST · by Gamecock · 22 replies · 552+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    If we desire to study the bible, we must realize from the outset that there are certain rules or principles that we must keep in mind, if we would understand it accurately, and so be able to apply it appropriately. The study of the principles of interpretation that we use to help us understand the bible is called “hermeneutics”; and the hermeneutic that we have when we approach the text is of paramount concern, because it will shape our understanding of everything we read. Although many Christians may not even know what the term “hermeneutics” means, yet in truth, everyone...
  • Theological FAQs: Does the Church have to interpret the bible?

    01/07/2010 2:41:23 AM PST · by Gamecock · 34 replies · 472+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    In this era of redemptive history, God has chosen to preserve his truth within the universal Church that he established with his blood; and hence he calls the Church “the pillar and ground of the truth” (1 Timothy 3:15), and exhorts believers to obey the Church's elders who labor in the word and doctrine (1 Timothy 5:17; Hebrews 13:17); however, the bible also indicates that it is necessary and honorable for individual believers to be studying the scriptures daily, to see if the things taught by the Church leaders, no matter how prominent they might be, are according to the...
  • Theological FAQs: Can anyone read and understand the bible on his own?

    01/06/2010 3:32:48 AM PST · by Gamecock · 34 replies · 859+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    The bible teaches that natural man will never be able to understand its truth on his own; for only the Spirit of God, who understands the mind of God, can reveal the truths of God, which are in direct opposition to the wisdom of the world (1 Cor. 2:10-16; cf. Acts 8:30-31). However, when the bible is read or heard, the Spirit works as he chooses, giving understanding and producing faith in many who hear (Jn. 3:4-12; 16:7-14; cf. Acts 16:14). Therefore, it is of great benefit for anyone who so desires to study the bible, knowing that “faith comes...
  • What Makes the Bible Unique?

    01/04/2010 12:17:14 PM PST · by Gamecock · 12 replies · 582+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    What Makes the Bible Unique? The bible is unique in that it is the only book that is fully human and also eminently divine. As a divine book, the bible is perfect, infallible, and inspired by God (II. Pet. 1:20,21; II Tim. 3:16,17; Lk. 21:33; Is. 55:11); it reveals God's own plan, will, motives and agenda (Isaiah 45:21-23); and it cannot be truly understood by anyone who is not taught by the Holy Spirit of God (I Cor. 2:12-16). And yet, it is also a thoroughly human book, and was written by human authors, each displaying his own unique style...
  • What is the Bible About?

    01/03/2010 11:16:23 AM PST · by Gamecock · 9 replies · 428+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    What is the Bible About? The bible gives an overview of world history from God's own perspective, with its doxological (i.e. God-glorifying) purpose, divine superintendence, and victorious end, all minutely planned out before the creation of the world (Isa. 46:9-10; Mat. 25:34; 1 Pet. 1:20; Rev. 13:8); and according to this divine perspective on history, all things were designed to be brought together in Christ, who is the reason for world history and the one in whom all things are summed up (Eph. 1:9-12; Col. 1:13-20). Thus, when he was on the earth, Jesus taught that the entire bible, from...
  • Where do we go to learn about theology?

    01/02/2010 9:47:55 AM PST · by Gamecock · 60 replies · 788+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    3.Where do we go to learn about theology? If we would learn about God, then we must ultimately go to where God revealed himself. We cannot learn about God from our own thoughts and reasoning any more than we could learn about the character of some stranger across the seas without first going to converse with him. Since God has revealed himself through creation, every human being can know him to some degree just by looking at nature. “The heavens declare the glory of God” (Psalm 19:1); and “that which can be known about God is manifest among [mankind], for...
  • Why is the study of theology important?

    01/01/2010 11:25:31 AM PST · by Gamecock · 22 replies · 521+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    2.Why is the study of theology important? From the dawn of human history, every people group across the world has been struggling with the great questions of human existence: “Who am I? Why am I here? What am I doing? How do I find meaning and happiness?”. Different civilizations and different persons have formulated different answers to these questions, ranging from the ultra-hedonistic principles of Cyrenaicism to the ultra-ascetic principles of the Hindu Jainists. However, both of these extremes, and every other human philosophy that lies somewhere in between, is insufficient to answer these questions. The great underlying supposition of...
  • What is theology?

    12/31/2009 8:04:59 AM PST · by Gamecock · 4 replies · 328+ views
    CPRF ^ | Nathan Pitchford & John Hendryx
    1. What is theology? The term “theology” comes from the Greek words for “God” (theos) and “word,” or “body of knowledge” (logos); hence, it means, literally, “the body of knowledge about God,” or, more simply, “the study of God”. Therefore, in its strict sense, theology has to do only with the knowledge of the Godhead, and not with the other doctrines found in the bible. However, for many centuries, the term “theology” has had a broader connotation, and is often used to refer to the entire body of knowledge related to the Christian worldview, including all the various truths that...
  • Darwin’s bulldog—Thomas H. Huxley (ironically, he had no patience for Christian evolutionists)

    11/04/2009 8:25:01 AM PST · by GodGunsGuts · 88 replies · 2,784+ views
    CMI ^ | November 4, 2009 | Russell Grigg
    Darwin’s bulldog—Thomas H. Huxley --snip-- Huxley, although an unbeliever, was thoroughly familiar with the gospel, and had little time for Christians who compromised their position by supporting the anti-biblical belief of evolutionary naturalism. He wrote: ...
  • Hugo Chavez Pulls 34 Radio Stations Off the Air (says those who share socialist vision will be back)

    08/02/2009 11:14:10 AM PDT · by Behind Liberal Lines · 27 replies · 1,988+ views
    Fox News ^ | 08/02/09
    Venezuelan president revokes licenses of 34, says those who share socialist vision will get back on the air