Free Republic 3rd Qtr 2024 Fundraising Target: $81,000 Receipts & Pledges to-date: $35,310
43%  
Woo hoo!! And we're now over 43%!! Thank you all very much!! God bless.

Posts by Truth and Freedom

Brevity: Headers | « Text »
  • During Super Bowl, for 30 Seconds, 2 Mayors Will Be on Same Side (Bloomy & Mumbles push gun control)

    02/04/2012 4:21:24 PM PST · 25 of 25
    Truth and Freedom to lentulusgracchus

    Billionaire Bloomberg and his anti-gun cronies at “Mayors Against Illegal Guns” (MAIG) simply blame others for their failure and refusal to deal effectively with violent crime and criminals. Bad people, not inanimate objects (like firearms) which are incapable of committing crime, are the problem. Fortunately, violent crime rates have dropped to record low levels in recent years while Congress and state legislatures are protecting and even restoring the right of law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms for self-defense.

    While MAIG’s claim to support laws that will lead to a reduction in crime rings hollow, perhaps a better expenditure of their time would be to focus their “crime-fighting” efforts on their own members.

    Among MAIG’s members, many have run afoul of the law themselves, having been indicted, arrested, or convicted of crimes ranging from obstruction of justice and resisting arrest, to extortion, to assault, to bond violations, to bribery, and theft.

    Glenn Harlan Reynolds, the Beauchamp Brogan Distinguished Professor of Law at the University of Tennessee College of Law, sums this up well when he recently noted, “A recent study found that mayors belonging to Bloomberg’s group have been arrested at a much higher rate than Tennessee handgun-carry permit holders, for crimes ranging from perjury and embezzlement to child sexual assault. But there’s no background check for politicians.” There probably isn’t time prior to Sunday’s big game to revamp the ad, but if Bloomberg and MAIG truly want to take a bite out of crime, perhaps they should first police themselves.

  • House approves bill to repeal one-gun-a-month(VA)

    02/02/2012 1:36:24 PM PST · 6 of 6
    Truth and Freedom to nonsporting

    Great news today from Richmond. In 1993, Virginia legislators copied a one-gun-a-month statute enacted in South Carolina in 1975. South Carolina repealed its gun rationing law in 2004.

    The Virginia General Assembly should pass Senate Bill 323/House Bill 940 and Governor McDonnell should sign them into law this year to repeal a statute that only affects and penalizes law-abiding citizens since criminals, by definition, violate laws — especially silly gun control laws. Criminals acquire firearms to misuse primarily through theft and illegal street transactions — both illegal activities.

    For non-residents of Virginia, interstate sale of handguns has been prohibited under federal law since the Gun Control Act of 1968. Also, if someone purchases more than one handgun for the same firearms dealer in a five-day period, a multiple sales report must be sent to the federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives (BATFE). Both of these are current federal law or regulation.

    And, since when did it become the role of government to dictate to law-abiding citizens an arbitrary amount of a legal product they may purchase in an arbitrary period of time. This issue is less about firearms and more about freedom versus a Nanny State.

    The time is now to right this wrong of nearly two decades ago.

  • Nightmare Scenario: President Ron Paul

    11/22/2011 3:58:55 PM PST · 78 of 81
    Truth and Freedom to Absolutely Nobama

    Congressman Paul Paul purports to be a “constitutionalist” but was not among the 245 cosponsors or 272 votes for H.R. 822 (National Right-to-Carry Reciprocity Act) on November 16. He also was one of two U.S. Representatives who signed the pro-gun congressional amicus brief in the Heller case but did not do so in the McDonald case. Finally, Dr. Paul was one of three Republican congressmen — joining anti-gun colleagues Mike Castle and Chris Shays — to vote twice against the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act which shut down frivolous lawsuits against the firearms industry that attempt to bankrupt them by holding them civilly liable for the criminal misuse of their products by others.