Free Republic

thanks for that...
seems like a 14th amendment issue might be in play here...equal protection. They were not allowed to present evidence that others were not wearing masks and weren’t charged. ?

Marine Week - Chicago

https://www.marines.mil/Marines250/#marine-week-chicago

lotta do-wop tunes tonite...
here's a change of pace
I Got The Sun In The Morning

these people carefully parse answers...

the statement was "...did not have a client list that he used for blackmail."

If he didn't have a list, what DID he use to blackmail ?

If he did have a list what did he use it for if not for blackmail?

so...the first question is...was there a list ?
remember...it depends on what the meaning of the word "is" is ?

Go Now

cripes...I got mine from the V.A. recently and they are OTICON ...not programmable by me...

cripes...I got mine from the V.A. recently and they are OPTICON ...not programmable by me...

OPM ? good luck with that. probably runout on day 1.

On Sunday night a new FBI, DOJ memo obtained by Axios concluded Jeffrey Epstein did not have a client list that he used for blackmail.

two issues here...was there a list ?

no Valerie Jarrett ?

7/10 - my dad would have been 99. WWII Army Veteran. Passed on to somewhere to else 8 days after he turned 64.

the judge should be an immigration judge.
check out this: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/8/1229a

there are time limits for filing for asylum and it doesn’t include 4 years before being caught.

Let them gender themselves however they want. Don’t require me to honor that.

It can probably also mock up the “bad” data for me trying to blow up the system ?...glad I got out when i did.

always been a testing mantra, code can’t create data...I’m guessing that’s gunna happen, if not already, with AI.

Interesting...back in the day, I was sucked under a pier by a wave, in the San Diego area.

cripes...everything not in chicago is a chicago suburb...approx. 25 miles away in a different county...

somebody show the judge: "Gun Control Act of 1968 (18 U.S.C. § 922)"
It imposes restrictions on certain groups, including non-citizens, from possessing firearms.
For example, 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(5) prohibits non-citizens who are illegally or unlawfully in the U.S., or admitted under a nonimmigrant visa, from possessing or receiving firearms or ammunition, with limited exceptions"

Does the judge's ruling do away with this law ?
Did the judge just make California a constitutional carry state?

it wasn’t “widespread”

44% of the yearly federal budget for SS & Medicare...another yearly 13.2% of the federal budget goes towards interest payments.

reducing SS payments to high net worth recipients reduces SS to means or needs testing...which it kinda does already.

I tried to get GROK to define the differences between means testing and earnings testing...

it and i gave up

https://grok.com/chat/12e7837d-5aad-48f0-bf3e-b18fe8326f6c