Sarcasm doesnt explain Rush’s intentional dissembling of the facts- after all he has been provided from various sources, it is not believable that he is so dense about what the Peter Paul matter is about- its about Hillary illegally soliciting more than $1 million then covering it up- not about a misuse of some fundraising funds used for an event. The DOJ prosecutor in the Rosen case summed it up when he told the jury its about “Denying the public’s right to know that Peter Paul personally gave more than $1.2 million to Hillary’s campaign” Hillary’s denial of personal involvement was exposed as a boldfaced lie by a federal judge and prosecutor when the government released a video of Hillary calling Paul in his office to designate a white house aide as a liaison for day to day coordination with her.
Considering the massive government and media cover up in this case- facts that are available to Rush if he truly hasnt paid attention so far, shows how his intentional ignorance on the case can not be chalked up as sarcasm.