Ah, so anything which is Christian in nature is to be posted on News/Activism. Then why have a Religion section? Unless that is for pagan religions.
Ok, I'll tell you what. You can continue posting lies and fabrications which have nothing to do with "Defense of religious freedom" in the "News" section and you will continue to be debated on your "News" merits.
Lines will be drawn, sides will be chosen and in the end Conservatism will loose.
I am having a hard time seeing where the confusion lies.
It is obvious that the soft tissue was fossilized. It is not longer "soft". How often do they dig up a dinosaur and find his hamstrings still attached? It is a "rare" find to have "soft" tissue still around... even if it still isn't soft.
The animals' remains are in such good condition palaeontologists suspect they were buried very soon after dying. Examination of the fossils revealed air-filled sacs in the bones, a feature that links the dinosaurs with the evolution of birds much later. "When we saw them, our jaws dropped. A lot of these theropods have really hollow bones, so when they get preserved, they get really crunched. But these were in almost perfect condition," Nesbitt said.
They likened a fetus to hair, fingernails or moles. That is the way they think. I told them that if you feed hair, fingernails or moles they will not become human beings with different DNA. That shuts them up.
I have a liberal friend and we go round and round about this.
Basically, his argument is that you can remove the clump of cells until it grows a central nervous system and can feel pain. Then killing it violates the Universal Moral Code.