Free Republic

prov 24-16, see also 1cor 6,9-10

paul writes of the cleansing, as if by fire, and you will be tested, and, the perishable will be burnt. Jesus also tells us as if youwere in prison, and your sentence needs to be paid, in order for you to leave.

philippians ststes very clearly that “ work out you salvation in fear and trembling”, also.”run the race until the very end”. both clearly state that there is no one time acceptance of Jesus as an assurance of salvation.

one cannot diein an absolute state of grace, one would have some small sins at least ( a just man sins sevens times daily ), and you have to be in perfect grace to see God.

the problem remains, that there is no debris.in teh ocean. they will continue to search there, because they dont want to come to the other conclusion.

if there was a crash, there would have beeb debris. so the 77 was landed, either on land, or, or the ocean, where it was scuttled to sink without trace.

they should cancel the pig and buy SU35s, probably can get them for a good price. the navy went for 2 seaters and got a pig, the F4, and kept the great F8 around for fighter escort, a truly classic design. they bought F18s to replace the Ao6, A7s, and the f18 can do neither role.
the F111, even in the F model never came close to meeting range and perf goals. they loaded up anF111 with4 multi ejector racks of iron bombs, and said it could carry the same load as teh B52, but ALSO do M2.0. macnamara was a real piece of shit.
stealth is a first wave threat. the later waves can be less stealthy and use drop tanks, wing mounted stores. the stealths are always payload limited by their internal capacity, small. the A12 fisaco tried to solve that with a huge delta wing that would have made it nearly impossible to land on the carriers it was supposed to operate out of.

gutless rush will say something nice about freepers, great, but he will not work for obamas resignation nor impeachment.

remember his saying, “ what more damage can klintoon do?” about 2 years into his last term? he dismissed those who wanted klintoon gone as KOOKS.

they should demand the truth, just like the families of the benghazi 4 need to be told, just who made the decision to not send in the rescue mission, and, how joe biden knew that that seal had one the size of tennis balls...

you would only load up the center if you were going 5,000 miles or more. the mains should get you to europe easily.

having worked on designing all aspects of aircraft, military and commercial, you incorporate every thing you know on how to make planes safe, whether to be able to withstand a 23 mm cannon shell going thru the structure, to allowable crack growth, and fail safety.
the after takedown testing could not show any way for a minimal fuel / vapor in the tank being ignited from a low voltage source, even “arcing”.
to buttress those facts, the tell tale signs of the explosion blowing skin panels inward over the length of damage, force one to realize that the source of the explosion was external to the airframe.
for a limited amount of IQ as you seem to have, even a center tank explosion could not make a 4 ft hole in the forward fuselage, going up and thru the body.

as i said previously, the most credible witness, was a coast guard heli pilot who was flying near, at a lower altitude, when he saw rocket trails come up, and go over, and behind him, then saw the explosion.
you can dream that obama ia actually a good president all you want, but the facts demsonstrate the opposite.

i had direct access to high res photos of the re constructed airframe, and, with both military experience, and, civilian, i came to the same conclusions that the senior crash investigators came to. it is unfortunate, that the results were ignored by people like yourself, who want to believe that something else happened.

if ignorance is bliss, you must be in heaven.

so any terrorist who blows up a market place full of innocent people, does not meet your criteria? lame-O

O learned from klintoon, after TWA800 was shot down, they delayed then came up with a horrid CIA vid that bore no resemblance to reality, 1996 in an election year, klintoon could not have a terrorist shoot down an airliner.

for the relatively short ranged flight, only the wing mains were needed, and the center would be empty.

i think you are referring to the airbus plane the the pilot over ruddered and broke off the fin.

esp when they never looked for the 2nd guy, a darker skinned arabian, who convenitently wa allowed to leave town,
and, that the entire ATF group was not in the office that day,

and, that the truck bomb could not have damaged the steel columns as the pics showed....

by far THE MOST CREDIBLE witness was the coast guard heli pilot who saw the missile tracks go over his copter and impact the 47 above and behind him.
the wreckage shows at least 2 major signs of impact, the most obvious was the large 4 ft hole thru the fuselage from the right bottom to the left top, exiting the upper body.

http://f1408.mail.vip.bf1.yahoo.com/ya/download?mid=2%5f0%5f0%5f1%5f19155102%5fALXvHkgAANM5UYRaYAo84nebvFc&pid=2.3&fid=Inbox&inline=1

5 Conclusion The notion of responding to a responsibility confronts us with a paradox. It clearly involves an element of choice and a complete absence of choice. 68Southern Burlington County, NMCP v Township of Mount Laure/336 A 2d 713 (NJ 1975) (Mount Laurel I). 69Southern Burlington County NMCP v Township of Mount Laure/456 A 2d 390 (NJ 1983) (Mount Laurel m. 70Hil/s Development Co v Bernards Township 510 A 2d 621 (NJ 1986). 71See table of non-derogable rights ins 35 on states of emergency. l'mperty and equality: public accommodations and the constitution 85 Responding to a responsibility to which one is called upon to respond is not the act of a subject. But neither is it simply a matter of being 'subject to' a responsibility. To be responsible is a mode of existence that cannot be reduced to either the passive or the active voice.72 Judges have a difficult job. They must do justice to both parties before them. When each side claims legitimate interests and plausible arguments for legal , ......... ..,·v .. ,judges face a painful and sometimes unbearable situation. The easy to deal with dilemmas such as this is to ·convince oneself that some other vorncll.illlg body should deal with the problem. But this conclusion is always a I do not mean that the court should always take the opportunity to the law; I do mean that the court cannot refuse to become involved. When is excluded from a restaurant on the ground of race, the precedents may establish a right to exclude or a right of access, or they may be silent on the If they establish a right to exclude, the judge's refusal to change the law l"."'""'" a ruling of law as much as a choice to change the rule. If the law is the judge's refusal to create a right of access cannot be characterized as a to make law; rather, the judge has ruled that property owners have the to exclude on the basis of race in public accommodations, and has done so, '"r,..,,..,,,r, in the face of a constitutional right to be free from discrimination by persons. Either way the judge goes, she will be making law, determining meaning of property in the new post-apartheid South Africa is not all the same. A private home is not the same as a retail store. interests exist in the context of the home that do not exist in the context e store. Stores implicate interests in equal access to the public world of the - a world that is public, notbecause it is publicly owned, but because it '~~'"""'"nt" a sphere of life to which all have access without regard to race. It is strict application of property law (the right to exclude) could have the of re-inscribing apartheid in a country that just got rid of it that requires a teei)tucll.izA:tt"ionofthe meaning of property. It is not possible to merely extend granted to white people to black and colored persons. The rights previously by white owners must sometimes be changed to achieve equality. Thus, may not have been a public accommodations notion in the apartheid era white people were, in fact, admitted to public accommocl~tions even if had a right to exclude them. If some prejudice remains, and a residual to keep certain groups out of certain neighborhoods, the right to exclude be limited in the context of the type of property to which norms of access prevail over norms of exclusiveness. useful to distinguish among types of social settings new article: Just Shoot Me: Public Accommodation Anti-Discrimination Laws Take Aim at First Amendment Freedom of Speech VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW [Vol. 64:3:961 2011] JUST SHOOT ME 1001 3. Political Speech: It‘s Not Just for Politicians Third, courts must be careful to protect political speech from far-reaching public accommodation laws. Occasionally, the message that an entity refuses to endorse may be a political one, which strengthens its First Amendment claim. In Citizens United, the Court held that ―political speech must prevail against laws that would suppress it, whether by design or inadvertence.‖261 In Landmark Communications, Inc. v. Virginia, the Court stated that ―there is practically universal agreement that a major purpose of that Amendment was to protect the free discussion of governmental affairs.‖262 Considering the continuing controversy surrounding the federal Defense of Marriage Act (―DOMA‖) passed in 1996,263 in addition to the often contentious battles surrounding the marriage amendments adopted by thirty states,264 it is a plausible argument that expression on such topics should be deemed political. Additionally, at least one influential scholar advocates a broad interpretation of political speech which would almost certainly encompass the expression in both Elane Photography and Ocean Grove.265 Cass Sunstein suggests that political speech should include all speech which ―is both intended and received as a contribution to public deliberation about some issue

i read a couple of his books and they were really good in the points he was making,: loving God, the Body, dance with deception