Free Republic

How do we even know this is real? The Fake News media says it was a huge victory for the Dems, even downballot, and supposedly even Repub districts elected freaks and minorities to Repub seats - and we just accept the Fake News media reports as gospel?

Who says they aren’t making this up?

Of course something can be done. President Trump is CinC. He can’t and shouldn’t directly interfere with the sentence, but now that the case is over, BB is still in the military and still subject to military orders.

Remember what the President said while he was still a candidate? About sending him back alone? What’s to stop him from giving that order now?

Don’t care. There is a war on, and my side isnt fighting back. The only army we have in the field wears blue and carries a badge. If there’s collateral damage, that’s what happens in war.

Unlike the so called wars in the Middle East over the last decade, this war carries a very real risk to me and mine. I want rules of engagement that keep my own soldiers safe, and if that means some of the other side’s “civilians” get hurt, well ... They should probably get their guys to call off the war, then.

Exactly why I’ve been saying that we need to pass national legislation stripping the citizenship of non-Jewish non-Christians. Citizenship should be limited to Jews and Christians. Period.

This would be perfectly Constitutional. It would not be an “establishment of religion.” So no First Amendment violation. It would not criminalize any other worship. And here’s the real proof that it is Constitutional: the Constitution prohibits a religious test FOR PUBLIC OFFICE. That’s it. It specifically does NOT prohibit a religious test for CITIZENSHIP, which tells me all I need to know about the Founders’ intentions that citizenship CAN and SHOULD be limited to particular religious adherents.

Massive Resistance, part two. The first wave should never have been abandoned - let’s hope this one has a better spine!

If it wasn’t for the blacks and the anchor babies mindlessly voting in lockstep, the Dems would never win an election in this country. And we aren’t allowed to point that out.

Communities aren’t allowed to set their own voting standards, any more than they can set their own marriage standards or businesses can set their own admissions standards. Everything - voting, marriage, business - is set by the Federal Government.

And I’m supposed to celebrate the Republicans who passed the Civil Rights laws? Communist dupes, every one of them.

“Many murder victims are not angels. Doesn’t mean it’s not murder.”

No. But it does mean that the so-called “murder” isn’t terribly important.

Snitches get stitches, but thugs get shrugs. This guy had a rap sheet, had warrants for his arrest, tried to take the Taser, and ran from the law. He died tired. I for one will shed no tears after so many similar thugs have done their level best to destroy this country.

Mr Whittle appears of an age to have been a healthy, relatively young man when the country was attacked on 9/11. What was his MOS?

I agree.

But fight how? Our elected officials won’t fight for us, so enacting legislation is off the table. If it were up to me, states would be nullifying Lawrence v. Texas and throwing queers in jail, but show me an elected official willing to do that.

So now what? I keep reading on FR that the queers can’t make us accept them, and things like “I for one will never accept fag marriage,” and so on - but so what? So we don’t accept it in our hearts, and that’s it? Fight’s over?

Is private contempt really the best we can do here?

That’s my own fervent hope - that people will finally see the tyranny of the “antidiscrimination” laws for what they are, and restore the God-given right of every individual to choose his own associations, in both private and business life.

Forcing a business owner to provide service to everyone, regardless of his personal beliefs, was always the camel’s nose under the tent. Take away the right of free association, and all else is expediency and an exercise in raw power. If they can force me to serve whom they choose, why can’t they force me to accept them as a tenant? And lo and behold, they can. So why can’t they force me to accept them as a roommate? And lo, it came to pass.

Next they’ll be forcing me to accept them as a wife. What’s to stop them?

When people see that, then the whole rotten edifice will come crumbling down.

The problem isn’t just with these “thugs.” The problem is with the whole “community,” as they call it, that provides support, encouragement, and shelter to a whole lot of “thugs” just like them. And I seriously think that this problem isn’t going to be adequately addressed, let alone solved, until the community as a whole starts getting some serious consequences for allowing and encouraging and promoting this kind of thing.

Community behavior should trigger community retribution. And then you’ll start to see the peer pressure in the community start going the other way.

But you’re at least implying that Israel would “become one” simply by denying Arabs the franchise. And I say that’s not so.

There is no “two-state solution.” There is instead a “multi-state solution” whereby Israel is a Jewish state within its current borders, and the surrounding Arab states exist within their current borders, and if the Arabs in Israel - including those Arabs in the West Bank and Gaza - wish to leave, and go to an Arab state, Israel has no objection.

“Apartheid state” is a leftist trope. It’s a red herring, inflammatory words designed to invoke emotion and cut off rational thought. Denying Arabs the vote does not equal “apartheid,” and conservatives shouldn’t accept that false premise.

The fact is that Israel is unique. Did the Boers in South Africa flee there after a tortured history of pogroms and genocide? No. Was SA established specifically to give the persecuted Afrikaans a safe homeland in the midst of a hostile world? No. And most important, did God Himself promise South Africa to white people? Of course not. So don’t toss around the word “apartheid” in reference to Israel.

Restricting the franchise to Jews is the most rational, least repressive, and most humane thing to do when a hostile minority is poised to threaten Israel’s very existence. It’s vastly preferable to the other alternatives. Israel needs to claim its own territory - all of it, including Judea and Samaria - and the Arabs can live there in peace without ethnic cleansing or expulsion. They just shouldn’t be allowed to vote.

Anchor baby. Classic.
This is why so-called birthright citizenship is national suicide. Born here or not, he’s not an American, and he absolutely should be deported.

Why does Israel have to let the Arabs vote? It’s a Jewish state, formed explicitly and expressly to give the Jews a safe homeland. Arabs have a dozen countries to choose from. Jews only have one.

Here in this country, we say that the Constitution is not a suicide pact. Israeli democracy shouldn’t be one either.

Ridiculous. Why do they allow it?

I disagree. I think Bibi just needs to ignore the results if fraud and outside influence (::cough Obama cough::) make it look as though he lost. Stay in office and brazen it out. The IDF is loyal to him, after all, since they understand the security situation better than anyone.

What was it Andrew Jackson was supposed to have said? The Chief Justice has made his decision, now let him enforce it? Something like that needs to be said to the left in Israel, because a result that kicks Bibi out is frankly illegitimate.

I don’t think this is funny at all.
I also don’t think is a “false flag,” or satire, or anything other than a cry to the Lord of Hosts that there is still a righteous remnant in the land of Sodom.
Not saying I agree with it in every particular. But when the enemy insists that they will accept nothing less than full capitulation, approval, and even participation in abomination, you don’t set the terms of the debate by conceding halfway.

There was a time when they did fear the law, and can anyone say we were a worse country back then? Liberals and communists have been steadily undermining society’s ability to keep a lid on their destructive impulses for fifty-plus years, and what we get are Mike Browns attacking the police.

The trouble with tbat way of thinking is that plenty of people are like me - posting in spurts as various issues come up, but then life carries us away from the Net for long periods of time.

I signed up in 2007, but I only have a handful of posts. Doesn’t make me a troll or a secret liberal - it just means that sometimes I’m away, and most often what I would have said has already been said by others. So I read more than I post.

I would have said that coming here to read and learn, and saying something only when I think I have something worthwhile to say, is a conservative trait.