Free Republic

You’re still banning people for blaspheming your reprobate candidate? Well, if you want to vote for your sugar daddy, you’ll have to vote 3rd party because there’s no way he gets to 1237. When he loses the first ballot, he’ll lose the second ballot by a huge margin. Why? Because his voters were too Lo-into to vote for delegates.

So there. Ban me because I told the truth about that cowardly con man and his low info voters.

The will of ~35% of Republican primary voters constitutes the will of the people?

I used to think a revolution or civil war would solve the problems in the government. I now know that’s completely impossible and would yield results far more intolerable than what we have now. I thought we could bring the government back under the authority of the constitution. I now see that the vast majority of the people (0 Democrats and 35% of Republicans) don’t want to be under the authority of the constitution. They want a strong man (Anti-Christ).

I agree though. I don’t think Drumpf will be the nominee. Too many negatives and he can’t broaden his support without Rat voters because he’s all out of them.

When Drumpf told Jorge Ramos to shut up, there was some part of me that admired his candor and hoped there was some way I could support him. Since then he and his cult have hurled so much of what I thought about our movement in a new light. I’m still trying to sort things out, but what I do know: I don’t want to have any part of any movement that supports or tolerates Drumpf. I don’t want to be associated with people, or shoulder to shoulder with people who tolerate his campaign to any degree.

Thank you for your reply. It’s encouraging that there are still rational people on FR.

I was only 12 when Reagan’s biggest mistake became president in 1988. I find it interesting that younger voters are voting for Cruz while old, angry baby boomers (who created all this mess) want to burn it all down.

I have no access to means and methods of convincing people who are convinced by Drumpf’s brain farts. I’m not making any attempt to convince you.

Reagan and Drumpf, no comparison. None. It’s completely dishonest to suggest there is. There is no way the motivations of Drumpf voters has any similarity with the motivations of Reagan voters.

His name is Drumpf. I’m not going to live in and alternate reality painted by a conman.

It’s certainly easier to imagine I’m a Democrat than dealing with the reality that Drumpf has created. We have a front-runner of the primary who many conservatives have vowed to never support. Why is that? Why does Drumpf up the ante of bad behavior, knowing he’s pushing more people into #NeverTrump mode?

Of course he would endorse Cruz. Levin is a constitutionalists. Cruz is a constitutionalists. The only question is why it took until now.

Now I’m confused. I used to think Drumpf cultists had more imagination than that.

That’s interesting. So, just like Trumpbart, FR’s political zeitgeist depends on who puts up the most cash? It totally fits how Drumpf acquires political influence and affirmation. It’s just a little shocking to see it put so explicitly without the slightest tinge of irony.

Let me put your comment in context: Flick Lives says that Free Republic tolerated a takeover by liberals because they donated.

There’s was a time when FR used to shame liberals like Drumpf and his supporters.

It’s actually 54%, but it might as well be the moon. Drumpf will probably not be the nominee and he certainly will not be president.

There’s was a time when FR used to shame liberals like Drumpf and his supporters.

It’s actually 54%, but it might as well be the moon. Drumpf will probably not be the nominee and he certainly will not be president.

I’m not really sure what you mean or how you define ‘good.’ What do you suppose my intent is? I really have no desire to nor delusions of changing the minds of the Trumprepublic echo-chamber.

Ok. It’s 54% as it stands now. 60% is what Cruz needs. If Drumpf wins Florida and loses Ohio, which is probably what happens if Rubio stays in, Drumpf will need 51%. That simply will not happen. Drumpf is out of open primaries and Rubio and Kasich will either suspend or be shown as completely nonviable. The probability of a contested convention is going way up and the only thing that’s likely to change that is Rubio or Kasich dropping out which would put Cruz over the 60% needed. Drumpf’s support is where it is.

Snarky insults = truth bombs.

And that vivid imagination of yours has produced another inaccurate characterization. The first time it told you that Drumpf is going to make America great again. Now, the characteristics of my life.

Exactly. It won’t happen though. Drumpf needs 60% of remaining delegates to stop a contested convention. I can’t imagine how anyone thinks that will happen. Drumpf will not win a contested convention. The Rats should keep voting in Republican primaries if they want Hillary to win though. It’s doing wonders at keeping the party fractured and the odds of it securing defeat for conservatism is almost 100%.

To be dismissive of a cult who defends and praises trash is no vice, so I have no problem making my thoughts completely clear to you and others like you. I don’t respect you, I question your faith, I question your motives, and I question your sanity because there’s no rational, decent person who can still think Drumpf is what you think he is. I don’t speak for the Cruz campaign or other Cruz supporters, but, if you wish, let is be known far and wide that I don’t care for Drumpf’s supporters or the people who vote for him anymore than the people who vote for Rats (probably care for you less than Rat voters). All of that would change the instant you come to your senses and realize Drumpf has been conning you.

It’s projection to call Cruz supporters acolytes. We are not. We simply believe adherence to the constitution is the way America should be governed. Cruz is the only candidate who agrees with us.