Free Republic

Here is a valid summary of what these criminally deranged lunatics in Shamrock Texas have done:

If YOUR bank (or ANY bank) loaned ME money and listed YOUR car as collateral to secure the note, they could NOT take YOUR car if I defaulted…

These people did exactly that. And, they have gotten away with it so far.

I guess the moral of the story is that, even if something’s done completely legally and someone else wants it, they CAN take anything at any time for no reason at all.

I just thought that you might get a laugh out of the crimes these people have committed with the assistance of Lynn Switzer's brand of “I do whatever I want to do and see whatever I want to see” justice.

If you've been following this topic, you might be interested in seeing the document that I’ve linked to below. It’s a couple of years old and the lawyers have had it all along. Honest people have only just now managed to get an original copy and it SHOULD have been very important but, for whatever reason, nobody wanted to use it in the criminal case being discussed here in which an honest and innocent person was “convicted” of stealing from a business that he very clearly owned with full rights to his receivables. The document is at:

http://www.shamrockedc.com/communications_att...

Of course, we're all still being told that “Texas doesn’t recognize that ‘out of state stuff’...

Texas is a throwback to the dark ages. Surprisingly enough, these people seem to be proud of their crimes. Why not? It works for them!

Here is a valid summary of what these criminally deranged lunatics in Shamrock Texas have done:

If YOUR bank (or ANY bank) loaned ME money and listed YOUR car as collateral to secure the note, they could NOT take YOUR car if I defaulted…

These people did exactly that. And, they have gotten away with it so far.

I guess the moral of the story is that, even if something’s done completely legally and someone else wants it, they CAN take anything at any time for no reason at all.

I just thought that you might get a laugh out of the crimes these people have committed with the assistance of Lynn Switzer's brand of “I do whatever I want to do and see whatever I want to see” justice.

If you've been following this topic, you might be interested in seeing the document that I’ve linked to below. It’s a couple of years old and the lawyers have had it all along. Honest people have only just now managed to get an original copy and it SHOULD have been very important but, for whatever reason, nobody wanted to use it in the criminal case being discussed here in which an honest and innocent person was “convicted” of stealing from a business that he very clearly owned with full rights to his receivables. The document is at:

http://www.shamrockedc.com/communications_att...

Of course, we're all still being told that “Texas doesn’t recognize that ‘out of state stuff’...

Texas is a throwback to the dark ages. Surprisingly enough, these people seem to be proud of their crimes. Why not? It works for them!

By the way David, I couldn’t help but to notice that your attacks have ALL originated during business hours and are posted from your (static) Centramedia IP address that is connected to your city-owned WORK computer.

Are the tax-payers aware that they’re paying for equipment and time for you to sit and make these baseless accusations that are centered on your fraudulently filed complaints that would get you nowhere without the criminal aid of your drug-buddies in the courthouse?

I’m somewhat curious as to how the taxpayers feel about having you collect their money while doing these childish things so that you are, in essence, a taxpayer supported “professional liar”.

I notice a very careful sidestepping of every single issue mentioned in my last posting...

Sure, these “facts” hold true that I didn’t attend a hearing. That is the ONLY reason the station is no longer here.

Now, look at WHY I didn’t attend the hearing (http://www.shamrocktx.us/courtofappeals.htm) and any sane person will easily begin to see the subterfuge involved...

The facts remain as stated: everything posted at http://www.shamrocktx.us/evidence.htm is court documented and (in a community not threatened with being terrorized by you and the prosticutor) will indicate that David Rushing and company has committed robbery, theft, burglary and many additionl crimes that have been covered up by the criminals in the courthouse with which he surrounds himself. (This is the reason one of them is currently in a prison and NOT still selling drugs to our children through the backdoor of the courthouses as he had been doing for so long.)

This is one story that simply MUST be told far and wide and until a responsible investigating agency that is not “bought and paid for” notices.

Yes. “Facts” that are only made possible because of and made null and void when the fact of an “unconstitutional incarceration” (brought about by YOUR and LYNN SWITZERS’ fraud, perjury and deception) are taken into consideration.

It WILL bring you and your co-conspirators down in the end. Otherwise, you would have a means of preventing my telling of the real facts as you’ve unlawfully ATTEMPTED to have done in the past: Hence the ruling surrounding the “unconstitutional condition of the local court” that was written and drawn up by your “prostitute of the legal system”. (http://www.shamrocktx.us/courtofappeals.htm) Remember, it was “Ms. Incompetence” herself who drafted the unconstitutional condition that has (after 14 months of her lies) been brought to light.

I PROUDLY stand by the FACTS and challenge you in ANY *FAIR* AND *HONEST* COURT to prove your case.

To David Rushing and/or any other person on this or any other list: Show me in the documentation found at http://www.shamrocktx.us/evidence.htm where ANY of the receiveables of my (or ANY) radio station was EVER pledged to David Rushing and/ or Shamrock Economic Development (Disaster) Corporation. Then, I’ll live by it. Only AFTER someone other than a drug-dealing and drug-using texas DA with a vested interest in covering-up his and his employees crimes and a liar who was too ignorant to verify ownership in a local business and too unintelligent to know that the people who were borrowing from him did not own the business.

David, it’s time for you to present better than a first, second or even a third grade arguement that is only backed up with the claim that “My courthouse drug dealer has promised to protect me by helping me cover my crimes by instructing me in how best to perjure myself while choosing to look the other way while I do it.”

You may wish to keep your crimes hidden away in nowhereland but, I *WILL* bring them to light in a civilized society by any and all means at my disposal as there are no longer any UNCONSTITUTIONAL orders preventing me from publicizing that which can be proven.

David Rushing, Lynn Switzer, Rick Walden, Toby Brooks, Jerry Bob Jernigan, John Mann, and many more are well on the way to the same notoriety as Richard James Roach.

Please, I ask, beg and even PLEAD: SUE ME!!! I’d LOVE to see you “prove” that I’ve manufactured these facts. The resulting publicity would be exactly what is needed to shine a light on your crimes.

You see, this goes far beyond a simple local radio station. this goes toward something that I value greatly. Something that Lynn Switzer has sold out and left by the wayside when she became “scared of another investigation that the office of the distrct attorney won’t be able to withstand”. This goes toward JUSTICE. And, I can assure you, I *WILL* see it served.

Why do you suppose I do not hide my identity while you do? Amazing what facts and honesty will do for you, isn’t it? You can lie as much as you want. Only those who are too ignorant of facts will choose to believe you. You are no longer arguing in small-town texas where people will say what you wish for them to say simply because they are afraid that you will terrorize them as you have sought to terrorize us.

Yes! The TRUTH is coming out. And, it’s NOT what David Rushing and Lynn Switzer and their cronies would like for it to be. Keep watching for THE ENTIRE STORY. (Probably still years in the making but, I can assure you that it WILL be told.)

The key to the entire matter is Rushing’s claiming the rights to the station’s receivables as being his “to take as collateral in the loan”. He’s referring to a loan that he stupidly made to some people who LEASED the station previously and NEVER OWNED IT. His claim (supported by the prosecutor, one Lynn Switzer) that the loan agreement entitled him to the receivables is fraudulent in that:

a) the people who borrowed the money did not ever own the business and, as a result could NOT pledge someone else’s receivables as collateral in ANY loan agreement,

b) the loan agreement entitled Rushing and Shamrock EDC to “All inventory, fixtures, furniture, equipment now owned or hereafter acquired wherever located”. (This is NOT a “blanket claim” that would include receiveables which are an intangible and MUST be listed in order to be used as collateral. Also, the business receiveables must be OWNED by the person or persons taking out the loan in order to become a portion of the security.)

An EXACT COPY (scanned from the original) of the loan agreement is at http://www.shamrocktx.us/files/loan.pdf and I’ll challenge ANYONE to show us where it allows David Rushing, Shamrock EDC or anyone else to claim the receiveables of this or any radio station. (Of course, Lynn Switzer will try to tell you that Mr. Rushing had originally INTENDED for it to include the receivables but, due to his inexperience (or whatever excuse comes to mind on any given day), he FORGOT to add receiveables to the list. Still, the fact remains that the receiveables are NOT listed and COULD NOT be listed as the people with whom Rushing entered into the agreement DID NOT OWN THE BUSINESS. (He also SHOULD’VE verified ownership before agreeing to loan them money against the business EQUIPMENT, which Rushing still has in his possession to this very date).

Just about any time now, we can all expect “rushdot” to make an appearance and start proclaiming “there are two sides to the story” and “a jury returned a guilty verdict”, etc.

BE ADVISED: THAT VERDICT WAS BASED ON LIES THAT THE JURY WAS TOLD. IT WAS BASED ON RUSHING’S PERJURED TESTIMONY THAT WAS MADE POSSIBLE BY LYNN SWITZER’S FLAGRANT DISREGARD OF *TRUE* JUSTICE. (All of this is demonstrated inthe transcripts that are available for downloading and reading at http://www.shamrocktx.us/evidence.htm.)

When rushdot makes his apprearance, stick to one basic line of questioning and he will wither and die like so much rotten fruit:

a) If Rushing was so certain of his rights to claim the receiveables, why an ARMED ASSAULT on the station BEFORE any “foreclosure” was ever prepared and certainly before it was filed with the courts? (This is HIGHLY ILLEGAL.)

b) Why did Rushing and SEDC and company REFUSE to accept the cash payout of the loan (that wasn’t even mine to pay-off)?

c) Why did Rushing intentionally, willfully and maliciously STEAL the receiveables for months and divert them into an account controlled by himself in order to prevent our meeting station deadlines with regards to payment of bills?

d) Why did Rushing STEAL the station’s public file (required to be located at the station at all times) and relocate it to HIS OWN OFFICE and then complain to the FCC ON MANY OCCASIONS that we had NO public file when he unlawfully had it in HIS possession all along?

e) Why did Rushing go to any and all lengths to make it IMPOSSIBLE to operate the station from it’s licensed location and at it’s licensed parameters so that he could continue complaining (at a cost to me of THOUSANDS to defend against each complaint) when he knew all along that HE was the direct cause of each of the violations that he was complaining about?

f) Why will Rushing (even now) tell you that I “missed attending a hearing at the FCC offices” when he knows all along that I was UNCONSTITUTIONALLY HELD PRISONER AT THE TIME OF THAT HEARING? (See http://www.shamrocktx.us/courtofappeals.htm for details and evidence of this.)

g) Why was Rushing ALLOWED TO LIE AND AIDED IN HIS LIES TO A JURY BY A PROSECUTOR CLAIMING TO REPRESENT THE “GREAT” STATE OF TEXAS?

Wait and watch: When “rushdot” makes his appearance, the story will be “You should see what the jury saw.” Well, I submit to you that the evidence IS POSTED and YOU CAN SEE IT. The transcripts are also posted and YOU CAN READ THEM ALONG WITH RUSHING’S OBVIOUS LIES AND SELF-CONTRADICTIONS.

Please, don’t allow these thieves to get away with this. If they *DO* manage to set a precedent with this criminal conspiracy, there will be NO business (or home, for that matter) that will be safe from “foreclosure at gunpoint without benefit of a hearing” when someone claims that someone (before you) MIGHT owe them some money and, as a result, they’re walking in and taking what is YOURS.

Had these acts been carried out AFTER a court proceeding or AFTER a foreclosure had even been PREPARED (let alone FILED), I could see that it MIGHT be possible. However, NONE of this is the case. These people walked in, unannounced, on a Monday that was just like any other Monday (while they were still smiling to my face and leading me to believe that they were willing to accept a CASH PAYOFF of the outstanding amount the other people owed and this was NOT out of the question as there was NO foreclosure in the works at the time) and THREATENED THE LIVES OF MY WIFE AND TWO (under ten-years old) LITTLE GIRLS. Our children still have nightmares of “the day the bad people took our clothes and toys”. (Rushing and company seemed to get a particular thrill out of stealing the children’s toys...)

Something needs to be done in order to publicize this matter and to bring the facts to light.

Richard James Roach was only the tip of the iceburg. Sharon Lynn Switzer is, if anything, even more insidious, evil and corrupt than her predecessor. In my own personal opinion, she shows as much interest in serving justice as Charles Manson. But then, I’ve heard her say that she can’t back down now because she was ordered to railroad me by Roach and backing down would only open her precious ofice up to more investigations and she “doesn’t think the office of the district attorney can withstand another investigation.”

Hey, Lynn! If there’s nothing to hide, why fear another investigation? Actively aiding and abetting Rushing and company is just as criminal as what Roach had you doing. And, I will NOT stop until I see this through. (On the other hand, if I weren’t right and didn’t 100% of the proof that I say I have, I wouldn’t be ascerting these VERY TRUE claims publicly now, would I?)

Come on... Let’s see you pull another UNCONSTITUTIONAL COURT RULLINGout of that mini-skirt and do your worst with it! The world is waiting and watching in more ways than you know...

All is not as it seems, David (”rusdot” is an acronym derived from David’s surname - if he even knows what that is - and his wife’s name: “Dottie”).

It’s not at all over. The writ was granted due to “an unconstitutional court ruling” that was written and sought by the replacement DA (so bad that she had to be appointed and NOT elected as a means of showing how popular she is) who is every bit as involved in crime and corruption as her drug using and dealing predecessor.

She’ll end up in a cell with Rick Roach and YOU as cell-mates. That is the reason she’s been openly admitting (at her weekly poker game) that she “really knows Mr. Hammond isn’t guilty of any crime but, to back-off now is to risk further investigation of the office of the district attorney and that would be really embarrassing.”

People like her (and YOU) are the same kind of people our troops are fighting against in Iraq. Same morals, same values. Maybe Bush needs to send in troops to liberate texas?

Hello. Although this may appear to be an automated posting, I can assure you that it is not.

My name is Keith Hammond and I have been a victim of “texas justice”.

I am now a “convicted felon” in that I was “convicted” of stealing from a federally licensed radio station that I own as a sole proprietor. This was due to a personal vendetta that has been carried out by a district attorney who has since confessed to and been convicted of using and selling drugs through his courthouse office. I helped in having this happen and, unfortunately for me, texas “law” makes absolutely NO provision for “DA’s who seek revenge during their last days in office”.

As your website seems to be somewhat similar to mine in nature (exposing crime and corruption in local government), I was hoping that we might exchange links? I’ll be happy to link to your site in exchange for a link or links from your site. As you may or may not know, this will improve both of our site’s rankings with search engines and many more people will be able to find and read our information.

If there’s any way that I could interest you in exchanging links and promoting each other’s sites, please feel free to contact me by email or by telephone. (My toll-free number is listed at the bottom of this message by my signature.)

Our sites are located at http://www.shamrocktx.us and at http://www.kbkh.com.

In the hopes that we will soon be cross-promoting each other,

Terry Keith Hammond KBKH FM-FM Shamrock, TX. 79079

1-866-726-9209 (Toll-Free)

And, the real side of this story is that Mr. Hammond did NOT serve any 2 years in a prison (much to the chagrin of the drug-dealing DA and the liar’s club EDB director). He is currently sitting comfortably at home awaiting federal actions against all of the criminals involved in this matter. I know. I am here! It’s people like David Rushing and Lynn Switzer that give small-town America a bad name. Stick to thievery and prostitution. It is more befitting you.

And, the real side of this story is that Mr. Hammond did NOT serve any 2 years in a prison (much to the chagrin of the drug-dealing DA and the liar’s club EDB director). He is currently sitting comfortably at home awaiting federal actions against all of the criminals involved in this matter. I know. I am here! It’s people like David Rushing and Lynn Switzer that give small-town America a bad name. Stick to thievery and prostitution. It is more befitting you.