It’s a bad move by both papers. Their readers are Harris supporters. An endorsement pacifies their readers. It’s not like withholding an endorsement would suddenly give them some measure of credibility or get the likes of me to subscribe.
That would be the silver lining of an islamic takeover. All those liberal women supporting muslims so they can feel all inclusive, then watching them get shut down and regarded as chattel by their islamic betters. And as an added bonus, we could watch progressive gays thrown off of buildings.
“There’s a war though within the Dem party right now for control. The Obamas are fine with Kamala losing to set up for 2028.”
I disagree. Dems don’t want to give up power, ever. With the steal going on like never before, I’d bet they think they can drag this communist whore over the finish line.
“I also find it more than just a little interesting why the owners of the liberal bastions of the Washington Post and LA Times will not allow their papers to endorse harris. In both cases key people resigned in protest.”
Hedging their bets? In the unlikely event the steal fails, they don’t want to be on Trump’s list.
“... What actually became of 2022? Why was it so? A whimper?”
Roe v. Wade was overturned. Women in general, suburban women in particular came out in droves to register their displeasure at having restrictions placed on their desire to kill babies.
10/26/2024 12:23:59 PM PDT
· 5 of 24 brownsfan
to ChicagoConservative27
“They say that?”
Not directly. Liberals don’t engage, they merely rant at you if you disagree. LOTS of those liberal scumbags are in this part of Ohio, and they will vote to preserve their right to kill babies. That’s where they find joy.
