Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Don’t Be a Liar
Archdiocese of Washington ^ | 01-03-19 | Msgr. Charles Pope

Posted on 01/04/2019 8:20:14 AM PST by Salvation

Don’t Be a Liar

January 3, 2019

Rest on Flight to Egypt, by Caravaggio (1597)

At Christmas we celebrate the Word becoming Flesh, but what does this mean for us today? Fundamentally, it means that our faith is about things that are tangible. As human beings, we have bodies. We have a soul that is spiritual, but it is joined with a body that is physical and material. Hence, it is never enough for our faith to be only about thoughts, philosophies, concepts, or ideas. Their truth must touch the physical part of who we are. Our faith must become flesh; it has to influence our behavior. If that is not the case, then the Holy Spirit, speaking through John, has something to call us: liars!

Therefore, away with sophistry, rationalizations, and intentions. Our faith must become flesh in the way we act and move. God’s love for us in not just a theory or idea. It is a flesh and blood reality that can be seen, heard, and touched. The Word of God and our faith cannot simply remain on the pages of a book or in the recesses of our intellect. They must leap off the pages of the Bible and the Catechism and become flesh in the way we live our life, in the decisions we make, and in the way we use our body, mind, intellect, and will.

Consider the following passage from the liturgy of the Christmas Octave:

The way we may be sure that we know Jesus is to keep his commandments. Whoever says, “I know him,” but does not keep his commandments is a liar, and the truth is not in him. But whoever keeps his word, the love of God is truly perfected in him. This is the way we may know that we are in union with him: whoever claims to abide in him ought to walk just as he walked (1 John 2:3ff).

Note some teachings that follow from it:

Faith is incarnational. What a practical man John is! Faith is not an abstraction; it is not merely about theories and words on a page. It is about a transformed life; it is about truly loving God and making His commandments manifest in the way we live. It is about loving our neighbor. True faith is incarnational. That is to say, it takes on flesh in our very “body.”

Too many people spout the phrase, “I’ll be with you in spirit.” Perhaps an occasional absence is understandable but after a while the phrase rings hollow. Showing up physically and doing what we say is an essential demonstration of our sincerity. We are body persons and our faith must include a physical, flesh-and-blood dimension.

Keeping the commandments is a sure sign. John said that The way we may be sure that we know Jesus is to keep his commandments. Now be careful of the logic here. The keeping of the commandments is not the cause of faith; it is the fruit of it. It is not the cause of love; it is its fruit.

In Scripture, “knowing” refers to than an intellectual understanding. It refers to deep, intimate, personal experience of the thing or person. It is one thing to know about God; it is quite to “know the Lord.”

In this passage, John is saying that in order to be sure we have deep, intimate, personal experience of God, we must change the way we live. An authentic faith, an authentic knowing of the Lord, will change our behavior in such a way that we keep the commandments as a fruit of that authentic faith and relationship with Him. It means that our faith becomes flesh in us. Theory becomes practice and experience. It changes the way we live and move and have our being.

For a human being, faith cannot be a mere abstraction. In order to be authentic, it must become flesh and blood. In a later passage, John uses the image of walking: This is the way we may know that we are in union with him: whoever claims to abide in him ought to walk just as he walked (1 John 2:6). Although walking is a physical activity, it is also symbolic. The very place we take our body is physical, but it is also indicative of what we value, what we think.

Liars John went on to say, Whoever says, “I know him,” but does not keep his commandments is a liar. This is strong language! Either we believe and thus keep the commandments, or we are lying about really knowing the Lord and we fail to keep the commandments.

Don’t all of us struggle to keep the commandments fully? John seems so “all or nothing” in his words, but his point is clear. To know the Lord fully is never to sin (cf 1 John 3:9). If we know him imperfectly, we still experience sin. Hence, the more we know him (remember the definition of “know”) the less we sin. If we still sin, it is a sign that we do not know Him enough.

It is not really John who speaks too absolutely; it is we who do so. We say things like “I have faith,” “I am a believer,” “I love the Lord,” and “I know the Lord.” Perhaps we would be more accurate if we said, “I am growing in faith,” “I am striving to be a better believer,” or “I’m learning to love and know the Lord better and better.” If we do not, then we risk lying. Faith is something we grow in.

Many in the Protestant tradition reduce faith to an event such as answering an altar call or accepting Christ as “personal Lord and savior.” We Catholics do it too. Many Catholics think that all they need to do is be baptized; they don’t bother to attend Mass faithfully as time goes on. Others claim to be “loyal” even “devout” Catholics yet dissent from important Church teachings. Faith is about more than membership. It is about the way we walk, the decisions we make.

Without this harmony between faith and action, we live a lie. We lie to ourselves and to others. The bottom line is that if we really come to know the Lord more and more perfectly, we will grow in holiness, keep the commandments, and be of the mind of Christ. We will walk just as Jesus walked and our claim to have faith will be the truth, not a lie.

Faith and works cannot be separated. This passage does not claim that salvation is by works alone. The keeping of the commandments is not the cause of saving or of real faith. Properly understood, the keeping of the commandments is the result of saving faith actively present and working within us. It indicates that the Lord is saving us from sin and its effects.

The Protestant tradition erred in dividing faith and works. In the 16th century, Protestants claimed that we are saved by “faith alone.” Faith is never alone. It always brings effects with it.

Our brains can get in the way here and tempt us to think that just because we can distinguish or divide something in our mind we can do so in reality, but that is not always the case.

Consider, for a moment, a flame. It has the qualities of heat and light. We can separate the two in our mind but not in reality. I could never take a knife and divide the heat of the flame from its light. They are so interrelated as to be one reality. Yes, heat and light in a flame are distinguishable theoretically, but they are always together in reality.

This is how it is with faith and works. Faith and works are distinguishable theoretically, but the works of true faith and faith itself are always together in reality. We are not saved by works alone or by faith alone; they are together. John teaches here that knowing the Lord by living faith is always accompanied by keeping the commandments and walking as Jesus did.

Therefore, faith is incarnational. The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, really and physically. Similarly, our own faith must become flesh in us, in our actual behavior.

Enjoy this incarnational Christmas carol:

Verbum caro factum est The Word was made flesh
Porque todos hos salveis. for the salvation of you all.

Y la Virgen le dezia: And the Virgin said unto him:
‘Vida de la vida mia, ‘Life of my life,
Hijo mio, ¿que os haria, what would I [not] do for you, my Son?
Que no tengo en que os echeis?’ Yet I have nothing on which to lay you down.’

O riquezas terrenales, O worldly riches,
¿No dareis unos pañales will you not give some swaddling clothes
A Jesu que entre animals to Jesus who is born among the animals
Es nasçido segun veis? as you can see?


TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; History; Theology
KEYWORDS: catholic
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-352 next last
To: infool7

They remind me of these two devious scoundrels, ganging up on Trump!        :-)


       

201 posted on 01/09/2019 6:30:29 PM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: Salvation

Thanks, Salvation!

202 posted on 01/09/2019 6:31:16 PM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]

To: daniel1212
Yes, but the damnation was not because the subjects were not good enough, but because what they impenitently practiced (clearly sin) meant they had denied the faith.

They were not watching their behavior daily. They began to mistreat other people, and they partied and became drunk. The Messiah was speaking directly to His disciples when he said this (answering Peter's question). He also listed two other less severe punishments, being beaten with many stripes, or beaten with a few stripes. This teaching does not quite fit the narrative of denying the faith. It is behavior based.

But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel. (1 Timothy 5:8)

Do you mean like the sons and daughters of Catholic parents who do not do practice works of charity and respect for them in their old age because they hate Catholicism ?
203 posted on 01/09/2019 6:33:50 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

"You keep ASKING this but yet you continue to fail to produce just what it is that 'the Scribes and Pharisees bid you to observe and do'."


That direct instruction from Jesus Christ (God) there in Matthew 23:2-3, to "observe and do" something, is given in that same discourse where Jesus says "Call no man father" (Matthew 23:9), so, shouldn't you be taking that other statement quite seriously too?   Given the importance of the words of Jesus, are you saying here that you want me to go do all the research for you, Elsie, to find out what the Scribes and Pharisees bid people to observe and do?   Do you also want me to then go on Amazon, and buy all those books explaining all that stuff for you, and then, do you want me to read all those books to you too, Elsie?

(How about a pizza -- do you want me to also go get you a pizza, then do you want me to eat that pizza for you too, Elsie?)        :-)

(By the way, you still haven't answered my repeated questions (shown here in my post #88), so one thing I WILL do for you, Elsie, is this:   I WILL go ahead and answer those questions for you, honestly, and gratuitously.)

To set those questions up, let's first establish the answer to this first one.



Many years after Jesus issued his instruction to "Call no man 'father'", did the Apostle Paul really call Abraham (a man) "father" of all believers in Romans 4:11-12?
The answer is:   YES, THE APOSTLE PAUL DID CALL A MAN "FATHER" IN ROMANS 4:11-12!
"And he received the sign of circumcision, a seal of the righteousness of the faith which he had yet being uncircumcised: that he might be the father of all them that believe, though they be not circumcised; that righteousness might be imputed unto them also:   And the father of circumcision to them who are not of the circumcision only, but who also walk in the steps of that faith of our father Abraham, which he had being yet uncircumcised."   Romans 4:11-12 (KJV)



Was the Apostle Paul disobeying Jesus when he called a man "father" in Romans 4:11-12?   The answer is:   NO!



Was the Apostle Paul doing something wrong when he called a man "father" in Romans 4:11-12?   The answer is:   NO!



Was the Holy Spirit (God) contradicting Jesus Christ (God) when the Holy Spirit inspired the Apostle Paul to call a man "father" in Romans 4:11-12?   The answer is:   NO!



Was the Holy Spirit inspiring the Apostle Paul to do something wrong when the Holy Spirit inspired the Apostle Paul to call a man "father" in Romans 4:11-12?   The answer is:  NO!



The reason those answers are all "NO!", is because Jesus did not mean "Call no man father" literally, but was using hyperbole (such as he often did when speaking, in order to make his points more forcefully), like when he told them to pluck their eyes out, or the time he told them that his disciples had to hate their fathers, mothers, wives, children, brothers, sisters, and even their own lives!

"And if thy right eye offend thee, pluck it out, and cast it from thee: for it is profitable for thee that one of thy members should perish, and not that thy whole body should be cast into hell."   Matthew 5:29 (KJV)


"If any man come to me, and hate not his father, and mother, and wife, and children, and brethren, and sisters, yea, and his own life also, he cannot be my disciple."   Luke 14:26 (KJV)




(By the way, think about this:   How could an "offense of the eyes" cause a person to be cast into hell -- like Jesus said there -- if they were "once saved, always saved"?   Was Jesus confused?)

204 posted on 01/09/2019 6:35:35 PM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

"I am quite willing to play the part of Balaam’s ride if need be."


And, by golly, Elsie, I must admit, you seem to be particularly well-suited to assume that role, I'll grant you that!   (If ever a person was made for a role, and a role made for a person...)        :-)

205 posted on 01/09/2019 6:36:53 PM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies]

To: Elsie

"But the Catholic man receiveth not the things of the followers of Luther; for he was a bad dude; dissing the Church and her non-biblical teachings and practices!"


Brother Elsie, (my brother with a sister's name), I've got a wonderful biblical teaching here for you:

"A woman shall not wear man’s clothing, nor shall a man put on a woman’s clothing; for whoever does these things is an abomination to the Lord your God."
Deuteronomy 22:5
(Back to work now, so, Toodle Loo, Elsie!)

206 posted on 01/09/2019 6:38:37 PM PST by Songcraft
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
You can call your random verse generation anything you want.

False; it is not random; it is purposeful and determinate.

So, according to 1st Corinthians 2:14, who is the spiritual man, and who is the unspirtual, unsaved man?

    There are two aspects to this,
  1. one where the spiritual and natural man are part of a person with a circumcised heart and struggles daily to overcome temptation and sin.
  2. The other is where only the natural man is found.


For example, the Apostle writes how the natural man behaves and commands Christians to lay aside that behavior and clothe themselves with new thinking and behavior.
  • This I say therefore, and testify in the Lord, that ye henceforth walk not as other Gentiles walk, in the vanity of their mind,
  • Having the understanding darkened, being alienated from the life of God through the ignorance that is in them, because of the blindness of their heart:
  • Who being past feeling have given themselves over unto lasciviousness, to work all uncleanness with greediness.
  • But ye have not so learned Christ;
  • If so be that ye have heard him, and have been taught by him, as the truth is in Jesus:
  • That ye put off concerning the former conversation the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts;
  • And be renewed in the spirit of your mind;
  • And that ye put on the new man, which after God is created in righteousness and true holiness.
  • Wherefore putting away lying, speak every man truth with his neighbour: for we are members one of another.


Ephesians, Catholic chapter four, Protestant verses seventeen to twenty five,
as authorized, but not authored, by King James,
underlines my own

207 posted on 01/09/2019 6:50:52 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1

Very well stated and of critical importance to the understanding of justification by faith ALONE!


208 posted on 01/09/2019 6:57:54 PM PST by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; Mark17
False; it is not random; it is purposeful and determinate.

The AI program that controls the posts in the account that bears your screen name is generating Scripture randomly - never accurately, and usually out of context.

The only conclusion that seems logical is that these passages are being generated randomly and perhaps this software should be adjusted.

209 posted on 01/09/2019 7:09:06 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: aMorePerfectUnion
The AI program that controls the posts in the account that bears your screen name is generating Scripture randomly - never accurately, and usually out of context.

The only conclusion that seems logical is that these passages are being generated randomly and perhaps this software should be adjusted.


Since post 209 is demonstrably false, it is logical to assume other posts about theology by that poster are also wrong.
210 posted on 01/09/2019 7:38:49 PM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981

Ha!

Is this the AI program still talking, or is a human posting again?

It just sounds so..... logical and emotionless.


211 posted on 01/09/2019 8:11:18 PM PST by aMorePerfectUnion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Elsie
>> #metoo <<

Are you saying that you believe in baptismal regeneration?

212 posted on 01/09/2019 9:30:34 PM PST by imardmd1 (Fiat Lux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: Salvation
Yes, thanks Salvation for posting threads where the misconceptions some have about Protestants/Evangelicals' beliefs concerning the gospel can be dispelled. We delight in being able to share the GOOD NEWS of the gift of God which is eternal life through Jesus Christ our Lord.

    But when the kindness of God our Savior and His love for mankind appeared, He saved us, not by the righteous deeds we had done, but according to His mercy, through the washing of new birth and renewal by the Holy Spirit. This is the Spirit He poured out on us abundantly through Jesus Christ our Savior, so that, having been justified by His grace, we would become heirs with the hope of eternal life. This saying is trustworthy. And I want you to emphasize these things, so that those who have believed God will take care to devote themselves to good deeds. These things are excellent and profitable for the people. (Titus 3:4-8)

213 posted on 01/09/2019 11:02:10 PM PST by boatbums (Not by works of righteousness which we have done but according to His mercy he saved us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_1981; aMorePerfectUnion
False; it is not random; it is purposeful and determinate.

That’s just your opinion bro. Obviously, I do not agree with it. To me, most (not all) the verses you post, as AMPU says, are usually misunderstood, misinterpreted, and taken out of context.

There are two aspects to this,
1. one where the spiritual and natural man are part of a person with a circumcised heart and struggles daily to overcome temptation and sin.
2. The other is where only the natural man is found.

I disagree with your theology, AGAIN bro. There is only ONE aspect to it. The spiritual man, is saved, and born again, and has assurance of salvation. The natural man is unsaved, not born again, on his way to Hell, and has NO assurance of salvation. Until a man becomes born again, and then becomes a spiritual man, he is automatically an unsaved, unspiritual, non understanding, natural man. The two are not related, and neither are the verses you generated.
Now that you know, that I think your theology is flawed, it should motivate you to figure out why, like maybe your theology, really IS flawed. Remember, I have assurance of salvation. 👍 I don’t know if you do, or not, but it really isn’t my problem. It’s yours. 🤣

214 posted on 01/09/2019 11:53:09 PM PST by Mark17 (Genesis chapter 1 verse 1. In the beginning GOD.... And the rest, as they say, is HIS-story)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: Songcraft
I love to see you trashing around in inches deep water while hollering, "I'm DROWNING!!!"
215 posted on 01/10/2019 3:46:05 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: Songcraft

I love how you have a non-gender specific screen name and then make snide inferences about mine.

Next thing ya know; I’ll be having a temple tantrum and completely unwilling to make a deal.


216 posted on 01/10/2019 3:50:01 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Songcraft
(By the way, you still haven't answered my repeated questions ….

I'll let any amused lurkers look back in the thread and check for any questions put to you that you've not answered.

217 posted on 01/10/2019 3:51:36 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 204 | View Replies]

To: imardmd1
This part: I say "No."
218 posted on 01/10/2019 3:53:32 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Songcraft
Elsie, I must admit, you seem to be particularly well-suited to assume that role, I'll grant you that!

Actually...

Balaam's ride.

219 posted on 01/10/2019 4:05:48 AM PST by Elsie (Heck is where people, who don't believe in Gosh, think they are not going...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: Mark17
That’s just your opinion bro. Obviously, I do not agree with it. To me, most (not all) the verses you post, as AMPU says, are usually misunderstood, misinterpreted, and taken out of context.

Except that is not what was written in posts calling it "random verse generation." Since the one posting knows the facts about the generation, and the reader does not, the facts are that the posting of the scripture has definite plan and purpose, and is not chosen at random. That the reader can be blind to this fact, willfully or inadvertently suggests other causes for that poor judgment, which would be then be an opinion.

When people claim to be spiritual, and are wrong about physical things, it discounts their testimony about spiritual things.
220 posted on 01/10/2019 5:20:25 AM PST by af_vet_1981 (The bus came by and I got on, That's when it all began.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240 ... 341-352 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson