Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”
Rorate Caeli ^ | November 8, 2017 | Roberto de Mattei

Posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide

De Mattei: Pope Francis and his “Lutheran turning point”

Roberto de Mattei
Corrispondenza Romana
November 8 2017




On October 31st 2016, Pope Francis inaugurated the year of Luther by meeting with representatives of Lutheranism from all over the world in the Swedish Cathedral of Lund. Since then, meetings and “ecumenical” celebrations ad abundantiam have followed one after the other in the Catholic Church.

A year exactly from that date, the “”Lutheran turning point ”was sealed by a symbolic act the gravity of which very few have noticed. The Vatican Post Office issued a stamp which celebrates the birth of Protestantism on October 31st 1517, the date Luther hung his 95 theses on the door of Wittenberg Cathedral.

V Centenary of the Protestant Reformationcan be read at the top of the stamp, presented on October 31st of this year by the Vatican Philatelic Office.  The official communiqué describes the stamp: It depicts Jesus Crucified in the foreground on a gold, timeless background showing Wittenberg city. In an attitude of penance, on their knees respectively on the left and the right of the the Cross, Martin Luther holds a Bible, source and point of his doctrine, while Philip Melanchthon, theologian and a friend of Martin Luther’s, one of the most important protagonists of the Reformation, holds in his hand the Augsburg Confession, Confessio Augustuana, the first official exposition of the principles of Protestantism drawn up by him.”

The substitution of Our Lady and St. John at the foot of the Cross with the  two heresiarchs, Luther and Melanchthon is a blasphemous offense that no Catholic cardinal or bishop has, to date, openly condemned. The significance of this image is explained by the joint declaration of the World Lutheran Federation and the Pontifical Council for the Promotion of Christian Unity, published the same day as the stamp. The note refers to the positive outcome of the dialogue between Catholics and Lutherans, endorsing the “new understanding of those XVI century events which lead to our separation” and affirms how both sides are “very grateful for the theological and spiritual gifts received through the Reformation”.


As if that weren’t enough, around the same time, La Civiltà Cattolica, the Pope’s “unofficial” voice, celebrated Luther  with  an article by Father Giancarlo Pani (Martin Luther, Five Hundred Years Later, in La Civiltà Cattolica , of October 21st – November 4th 2017, pp. 119-130)

Father Pani is the same priest who said in 2014 that the Fathers of the Council of Trent had admitted the possibility of divorce and remarriage in the case of adultery, according to the custom established in the schismatic Greek Church. Now he is sustaining that Martin Luther was in no way a heretic, but an authentic “reformer”.  In fact, “ the theses of Wittenberg are not a challenge, nor a rebellion against authority, but the proposal to renew the proclamation of the Gospel, in the sincere desire for a “reform” in the Church”. (p.128). Despite the claim “ by the Church of Rome and Luther of incarnating the truth in toto and being dispensers of it ” “ the role Luther had as a witness to the faith cannot be denied: He is “the reformer”;  he was able to initiate a process of “reform”  where the results of it  have also benefited the Catholic Church.”

If this is the case then he has been unjustly persecuted and defamed by the Catholic Church for 500 years. The time has come to rehabilitate him.  And in order to rehabilitate him we cannot limit ourselves to presenting only his prophetic side, but must make the Church accept and put into practice his demands of reform. And the Post-Synod Exhortation Amoris Laetitia represents a decisive stage on this path. They are not wrong then the authors of the Correctio filialis  (to Pope Francis) when they underlined “the affinity between Luther’s ideas on the law, justification and matrimony and those taught  or favored by Pope Francis in Amoris laetitia and elsewhere.” 

At this point it should be remembered that Pope Francis, like Father Pani, belongs to the Company of Jesus, whose Founder, St. Ignatius of Loyola, was the champion of the Faith that Divine Providence raised up in the XVI century against Lutheranism. In Germany, apostles like St. Peter Canisio and Blessed Peter Fabro, fought every inch of the way against the heretics and on the terrain of anti-Protestant controversy no-one can surpass St. Robert Bellarmino.

La Civiltà Cattolica was founded in 1850, with the support of Pius IX, and had a role of doctrinal defense against the errors of the time for a very long time. From its very first edition, on April 6th 1850, it dedicated an extensive anonymous essay (by Father Matteo Liberatore) on The Political Rationalism of the Italian Revolution, in which he saw Protestantism as the cause of all modern errors. These theses were developed, among others, by two famous Jesuit theologians: Fathers Giovanni Perrone (Protestantism and the Rule of the Faith, La Civiltà Cattolica, Rome 1853, 2 voll.), and Hartmann Grisar (Luther, Herder, Freiburg im Breisgau, 1911/1912, 3 voll.).

But the commemoration of the Lutheran revolt made by the Jesuit journal in October 1917, the fourth centenary marking the 95 theses in Wittenberg, takes on a special meaning.  (Luther and Lutheranism, in La Civiltà Cattolica, IV (1917), pp. 207-233; 421-430). The theologian of La Civiltà Cattolica explained that “The essence of the Lutheran spirit, or rather Lutheranism, is rebellion in all of its extension and in all the force of its word. Rebellion, therefore, which is personified in Luther, was varied and profound, complex and very vast; which apparently appeared but was in fact violent, angry, trivial, obscene and diabolic; deep down it was studied, and directed according to the circumstances, focused on opportunistic ends and interests, intended and wanted with  measured, resolute determination.” (pp.208-309).

Luther, La Civiltà Cattolica continues, “initiated that contemptible parody, with which the rebel monk attributed to God, his ideas, blasphemies and the abominations of his perverted mind: he outraged the Pope in an unspeakable way in the name of Christ, he cursed Caesar in the name of Christ, he blasphemed against the Church, against bishops, against monks with absolute infernal impetuosity, in the name of Christ; he threw his religious habit onto the tree of Judas, in the name of Christ and in the name of Christ he was married sacrilegiously” (p.209). “With the very convenient pretext of following Scripture, as that which alone contains the word of God, he conducted a war on scholastic theology, tradition, canon law, all the institutions and precepts of the Church and councils: in place of these august and venerated things, he, Martin Luther, perjured monk and self-proclaimed doctor, put himself and his authority! Popes, doctors and Holy Fathers were no longer of any worth; the word of Marin Luther was worth more than all of them!  (p.212). The Lutheran theory of justification, in the end, “was born of Luther’s imagination, not by the Gospel or any other word of God revealed to the writers of the New Testament: for us, every Lutheran novelty finds its origins in the concupiscence he stimulated, and in his development of the falsification of Scripture or in formal lying” (p.214

Father Pani cannot deny that the opinion he gives of Luther is a 360 degree turnaround from the one his confreres gave in the same journal, a century ago.  In 1917,  he was censured as an apostate, a rebel, a blasphemer; today he is being praised as a reformer, a prophet, [even] holy. No Hegelian dialectic can harmonize yesterday’s judgment with today’s. Luther was either a heretic who denied some basic dogmas of Christianity, or he was a “witness to faith” who initiated  the Reformation of the Church, brought to completion by the Second Vatican Council and Pope Francis.

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

It is time for choices and to mediate precisely on St. Ignatius’ two standards (Spiritual Exercises, n. 137)* which will help us make them in these difficult times.



*Translator’s note: ”It will be here how Christ calls and wants all under His standard; and Lucifer, on the contrary, under his.” (no. 137, Spiritual Exercises).



Translation: Contributor Francesca Romana



TOPICS: Apologetics; Catholic; Theology; Worship
KEYWORDS: francischurch; heresy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-393 next last

1 posted on 11/09/2017 1:57:06 PM PST by ebb tide
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

>>In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

They could ask Jesus’ mom what she thinks.

I’ll stick with Scripture.


2 posted on 11/09/2017 2:14:56 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
I’ll stick with Scripture.

Are you sure?

Twenty One Reasons to Reject Sola Scriptura

3 posted on 11/09/2017 2:30:10 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Serious question: why did Francis go to Sweden to commemorate a German monk? Seemed off at the time, still does.


4 posted on 11/09/2017 2:39:25 PM PST by ameribbean expat (Veritas Vincit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

In short, every Catholic is called upon to choose whether to side with Pope Francis and the Jesuits of today, or be alongside the Jesuits of yesterday and the Popes of all time.

Almost like he's calling for a schism.

I side with 2,000 years of the Church, all of the saints, and the popes up until Francis.

5 posted on 11/09/2017 2:58:07 PM PST by BlessedBeGod (To restore all things in Christ~~Appeasing evil is cowardice~~Francis is temporary. Hell is forever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
I’ll stick with Scripture.

Are the following in your "scripture", or did Luther excise them also, from his"book"?

"[25] But there are also many other things which Jesus did; which, if they were written every one, the world itself, I think, would not be able to contain the books that should be written." [John 21:25]

[26] But the Paraclete, the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he will teach you all things, and bring all things to your mind, whatsoever I shall have said to you." [John 14:26]

Or how about this?

"[8] But you shall receive the power of the Holy Ghost coming upon you, and you shall be witnesses unto me in Jerusalem, and in all Judea, and Samaria, and even to the uttermost part of the earth." [Acts Of Apostles 1:8]

6 posted on 11/09/2017 3:08:35 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

>>Are you sure?

>>Twenty One Reasons to Reject Sola Scriptura

Absolutely. The Roman Church has proven itself to be unreliable as the final decider of what is true. If I was going to believe those 21 reasons, I’d follow the Eastern Church before I’d follow Rome because it is closer to the original church in teachings and worship.

But, the Roman Church is a church like any other. It has a basis in Scripture, so I’m not going to pile on and call it antiChrist or anything. But, since the Gospel was released to the people in the 15-16th century, it has just become one church among many who all follow the same Christ. But most of the others rely solely upon Him, while you have your Pope.


7 posted on 11/09/2017 3:10:21 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Asking a pro athlete for political advice is like asking a cavalry horse for tactical advice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
If I was going to believe those 21 reasons, I’d follow the Eastern Church before I’d follow Rome because it is closer to the original church in teachings and worship.

So why haven't you joined the Eastern Church if you believe it to be closer to the "original" church. What church is yours and how "original" is it?.

8 posted on 11/09/2017 3:13:46 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Bryanw92
Absolutely. The Roman Church has proven itself to be unreliable as the final decider of what is true.

How so? Where are your "proofs"?

Secondly what "church" is the real "decider of what it true"?

9 posted on 11/09/2017 3:17:19 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Of course they are in the Bible that protestants use. However, nothing the Holy Spirit teaches can ever contradict Scripture, as they come from the same source. So if anyone attempts to appeal to the Holy Spirit as the source of a doctrine that contradicts Scripture, then they are obviously mistaken or deceived somehow.

Also, what the Holy Spirit teaches is an individual experience, so it can be disputed by others who may not have experienced it the same way, but Scripture is held by all, so there can’t be any dispute as to what it says. That’s why Scripture is the final authority as to doctrine, since we all have the same Scripture to appeal to.


10 posted on 11/09/2017 3:18:59 PM PST by Boogieman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Boogieman
Of course they are in the Bible that protestants use. However, nothing the Holy Spirit teaches can ever contradict Scripture, as they come from the same source. So if anyone attempts to appeal to the Holy Spirit as the source of a doctrine that contradicts Scripture, then they are obviously mistaken or deceived somehow.

Nothing the Catholic Church teaches contradicts Holy Scripture.

Also, what the Holy Spirit teaches is an individual experience, ...

Pure hogwash. The apostles were in a closed room when then the Holy Ghost descended upon them. And they never split from each other in their own different "religions".

The Holy Ghost did not descend upon those outside the room. It was a select few. I was not there, you weren't there and Luther wasn't there.

11 posted on 11/09/2017 3:32:39 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: ebb tide

If the Pope is so Lutheran, then would you refuse to recant to his face and take excommunication from him instead of giving up the Catholic faith you love so much?


13 posted on 11/09/2017 3:44:46 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide; Religion Moderator

This thread is devolving into immature slander and topics that got the banhammer in earlier threads.

Abuse reported.


14 posted on 11/09/2017 3:45:53 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

So if you were called before Francis and threatened with excommunication if you didn’t recant everything you said about him on FR, what would you do?


15 posted on 11/09/2017 3:47:40 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Never would have imagined this chaos in the Church would come in my lifetime. Prayers up for Holy Mother Church.


16 posted on 11/09/2017 3:48:13 PM PST by Bigg Red (Vacate the chair! Ryan must go. Dump McConnman, too.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Luircin

Unlike Bergoglio, I would never give up the Catholic Faith.

Have you heard of the Catholic martyrs?


17 posted on 11/09/2017 4:01:22 PM PST by ebb tide (We have a rogue curia in Rome.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide

Respect for that.

And would you still take Communion and worship then?

Because in the eyes of Catholics who still follow Francis, you’d be guilty of starting your own religion by defiance to the Pope and the Church Magusterium.


18 posted on 11/09/2017 4:05:37 PM PST by Luircin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ebb tide
Nothing the Catholic Church teaches contradicts Holy Scripture.

Bwahahaha!

You also need to read Scripture about Pentecost. Nothing says it was a closed room. The apostles were part of a group of 120 who were meeting in the house and the entire house was filled and ALL the people there were baptized in with the Holy Spirit and they all began to speak in tongues. That includes the mother of Jesus.

Imagine that. Mary spoke in tongues.....

19 posted on 11/09/2017 4:07:01 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: BlessedBeGod

By what authority do you reject the pope that the college of cardinals elected?

Did the Holy Spirit guide them in that selection or not?


20 posted on 11/09/2017 4:09:06 PM PST by metmom ( ...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 381-393 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Religion
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson