Posted on 12/14/2014 11:57:21 AM PST by ealgeone
The reason for this article is to determine if the worship/veneration given to Mary by the catholic church is justified from a Biblical perspective. This will be evaluated using the Biblical standard and not mans standard.
But what about the DOCTRINE that seems to have come from lower on the torso?
In a nutshell, that pretty much sums it up.
Why would you even make such a statement? There is not a Catholic alive that "goes by what the Bible says". They go by what the "church" says. The Catholic Church is built on other than "what the Bible says". It's their stock in trade. They claim it is NOT the Bible alone. Non Catholics are ridiculed for claiming truth in scripture alone.
Wow! There you go interpreting scripture. It doesn't say "Jewish law". Was James also talking about the "work of Jewish law"? You can't have it both ways. So which is it? Either both Paul and James were talking about "work of Jewish law" or they were not. Enlighten us.
Because the word "judgement" can mean two things as we can well see in scripture. We are to "judge" whether teaching is correct or not. "Judgement" does not always include accusation of wrongdoing. To believe that Jesus forgives all of our sins but then state that those sins will be again brought up at some later date is accusing God of lying. Either He forgives them and never brings them up again or He doesn't. Which is it for you?
I know all that and more. I find it odd when Sola Scriptura adherents admit they don't really have a true translation of the scriptures, so that they must change it on the fly, to try to prove reformation of Christianity doctrines; seems like a circular argument to me. I note how readily they shed what the traditional Protestant and Independent Fundamental Baptist relied upon, the Crown-Authorized Bible. What is usually conceded next is that there are no original manuscripts upon which to base their new translations, and they often include the oldest known rather than the Textus Receptus.
Yes we are, and Revelation 12 is the vision expressed in Isaiah 66. The woman is the nation of Israel, the twelve stars are the twelve tribes of Israel.
Yes, it's in scripture as has been shown many times.
I clearly showed where you injected the words “reject the gift” into a verse after you made the claim that you do no such thing.
Yes, I am persuaded that had I died in childbirth, or reasonably thereafter, I would have been saved.
Was the Holy Spirit was upon him even as he murdered another man so he could take the other man's wife in adultery ?
The "set of works" is in Matthew 25:31-46. Please review them.
As you can see, it is not really a "set" but rather it is a consistent behavior of charity ordered onto imitation of Christ and at the same time recognition of Christ's presence. This is why the best way to be saved is to study the lives of saints and to pray for their guidance; this is also why the Protestant so-called reformation did a great damage to souls and ruined many.
This morning I saw a dozen posts from Elsie and Cynical Bear.
I will now review them and if there are any worth answering I will. I don’t expect many will be in the category. If I miss anything of substance, please ask again.
Romans 4:5 speaks of someone who "does not work" and later applies it to Abraham prior to his circumcision. So then "work" [there] is a work of Jewish law.
Circumcision is work of Jewish law.
"Judgement" does not always include accusation of wrongdoing.
LOL.
To my knowledge, this interpretation of Rm. is not infallible or indisputable teaching, nor that Paul here is dealing with the same thing as James in cp. 2 (below*). While Paul refers to Abraham being justified before circumcision to disallow justification on the basis of the merit gained by law-keeping (though circumcision proceeded the actual giving of the law), yet the apparent reason for the law being that which is contrasted with justification b y faith to him that worketh not is because, as pointed out before,
"if there had been a law given which could have given life, verily righteousness should have been by the law." (Galatians 3:21)
The law was the epitome of all systems of salvation obtained by the merit of law-keeping, that by good works one becomes good enough to be with God, as Rome teaches. Abraham had done works before God counted him righteous because he believed God to do what he could not do, as must we under the law/salvation by moral worthiness, that is, to become good enough to be with God.
However, thank God He can cleanse and declare us justified as he did with the penitent publican and so-called "good thief" (Lk. 18, 23) the moment we believe , even though they would have sinned again if they lived any longer. If being in Christ and having eternal life depended upon attaining and dying as perfect in obedience, then one would be back under the Law, which Catholicism basically does, with added moral perfection of character added, but which claims to offer more grace so that one may attain this moral perfection needed to enter Heaven.
Which necessitates purgatory, without which most all Catholics would be excluded from Heaven according to their theology, yet not in Hell as they are neither good enough for Heaven nor bad enough for Hell. However, no one can really become good enough to be with God, and if salvation is based upon moral perfection, then those who lack it are only fit for Hell. Incorporating the atonement into this fails to help in the long run as it only provides for forgiveness and more grace to attain what the law and RC soteriology demands, but will not make one morally good enough in character. If it was sufficient to simply die forgiven then that would be obtained thru faith, not works, as is the positional righteous status God gives to those who believe, but who are not morally perfect in character.
To be sure, holiness as an attribute of faith, meaning a faith that effects holiness (according to grace given) is necessary to see God, as without it then it is no faith. However, both the the penitent publican and so-called "good thief" (Lk. 18, 23) and the unGodly who worketh not were justified by faith, and wherever the Bible manifestly speaks of the postmortem condition of the believers, or post resurection, it is always with the Lord. (Lk. 23:43 [cf. 2Cor. 12:4; Rv. 2:7]; Phil 1:23; 2Cor. 5:8 [we]; 1Cor. 15:51ff' 1Thess. 4:17) Note in the latter case all believers were assured that if the Lord returned, which they expected in their lifetime, so would they ever be with the Lord. (1Thes. 4:17) though they were still undergoing growth in grace, as was Paul. (Phil. 3;2)
And indeed, the moment one believes then his heart is purified by faith, which faith is counted for righteousness, and he is washed, sanctified and justified in the name of Jesus and by the Spirit of God, (1Cor. 6:11) accepted in the Beloved and made to sit together with Christ in Heavenly places. (Eph. 1:5; 2:6)
This is all on Christ's expense and righteousness.
Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood, to declare his righteousness for the remission of sins that are past, through the forbearance of God; To declare, I say, at this time his righteousness: that he might be just, and the justifier of him which believeth in Jesus. Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay: but by the law of faith. (Romans 3:25-27)
It is impossible to read another system of salvation by works, earning Heaven thru the attainment of practical moral perfection of character, even if stipulated as being achieved thru grace, and Titus 3:5 broadly excludes "works which we have done" as not being salvific.
But i see these holy effects are justificatory in the sense of testifying to being a believer, and fit to be rewarded for what faith has effected, which God in unmerited grace as we owe God everything, and never would have even accepted Him unless God convicts, draws, opens hearts, and grants repentant faith, so that the soul can believe, (Jn. 16:9; Jn. 6:44; 12:32; Acts 11:18; 16:14; Eph. 2:8,9) doing what he otherwise would not and could not do. And who then works in us to motivate and enable us to obey Him.
But which still does not make us perfect enough to be with God, nor does suffering the loss of rewards (1Co. 3;8ff) when Christ returns make us so (which some RCs imagine is purgatory) In fact, perfection of character tested virtue is not merely accomplished by suffering, but in this world with its trials and temptations.
Instead, just as the dying contrite criminal went to be with the Lord though surely not attaining moral perfection of character (and his only work was confessing Christ despite his condition), so also those who believe hold the beginning of their confidence/faith fim unto the end, (Heb. 3:6,14) repenting when they realize they have not, have eternal life now and will be with the Lord at death or at His return.
That i would always hold most firm confidence in Christ!
Catholic Encyclopedia on James vs.Paul:Catholic exegetes have become more and more convinced that the Epistle in question, so remarkable for its insisting on the necessity of good works, neither aimed at correcting the false interpretations of St. Paul's doctrine, nor had any relation to the teaching of the Apostle of the Gentiles. On the contrary, they believe that St. James had no other object than to emphasize the fact already emphasized by St. Paul that only such faith as is active in charity and good works (fides formata) possesses any power to justify man (cf. Galatians 5:6; 1 Corinthians 13:2), whilst faith devoid of charity and good works (fides informis) is a dead faith and in the eyes of God insufficient for justification (cf. James 2:17 sqq.).
According to this apparently correct opinion, the Epistles of both Apostles treat of different subjects, neither with direct relation to the other. For St. James insists on the necessity of works of Christian charity, while St. Paul intends to show that neither the observance of the Jewish Law nor the merely natural good works of the pagans are of any value for obtaining the grace of justification (cf. Bartmann, "St. Paulus u. St. Jacobus und die Rechtertigung", Freiburg, 1897). Catholic Encyclopedia>Justification; http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08573a.htm
The term you use, “Jewish Law,” is ambiguous.
Jews were known to follow both Torah, and the true “Jewish Law,” the Takanot and Ma’asim of the Pharisees.
Even the terms “commandments,” and “ordinances” can be ambiguous, and it is necessary to carefully examine the text in many cases, especially in Paul’s epistles.
In the case of James, it is safe to infer that he spoke of true Torah based acts of love arising out of spiritually guided faith. Its just not that easy with Paul, as his writings covered a much more vast array of human actions.
When he spoke to the Galatians he was clearly speaking of the pollutions injected by the Pharisees, but when he spoke to the Corinthians in chapter 11, he was very obviously speaking of the commandments that he personally taught them.
.
Your Bible disagrees with mine. Either that or you are again injecting your own opinion into the Bible account. David did not murder another man. That man, Uriah, was a warrior, and he died in battle as an honorable man, serving his king. While David asked Uriah's commander to put him at the forefront of the battle, you do not know that Uriah might have died in any case. For one reason or another, God wanted Uriah dead at that point. Are you saying that God could not have saved Uriah and brought him back to his wife?
The case was that Satan, the god of this world, provided the progenitor of Joseph and Mary a situation testing his obedience to God. If David had listened to the guidance of the Holy Spirit rather than the urging of his pecker, he would still have been Bathsheba's husband, yet without sinning by anticipating Uriah's death but instead, joining with Bathsheba after she became a widow. In any case, David's sin with Bathsheba was found out. He could hide it neither from God nor man. David was a sinner: saved, but still a sinner. Yet, being saved, he had an option--obey God or obey your own lusts. In it all, The God of the Bible, through Paul, proclained David as a man "after His own heart" (Acts 13:22) David was a sinner, and when He was guided by the Holy Ghost, the writer of a large portion of the longest book in the Bible.
God saves sinners. Before their redemption, humans stained with the crime of their father Adam have no power over their bent to give in to sin. They are not sinners because they sin--they sin because they are sinners.
Sinners who are saved also are tempted to sin, as Jesus was in the beginning of His ministry. And though Jesus by victory over death has broken the power of sin as a master, though they are regenerated with the indwelling Spiritual Advisor, and though they have the clear ability to choose the right thing to do and make that choice stick, sometimes they ignorantly or willingly through spiritual immaturity choose otherwise, and they do err.
When that happens, they are faced with another choice: do I humble myself, confess my sin, and repent, being forgiven by the Faithful, Just Father, and be cleansed of all unrighteousness; and go on walking in the light? or do I cling to my pride, reject The Counselor's urging, and go on walking in the dark, out of fellowship with God and other Christians?
David chose the former and was renewed in fellowship with The Father. More than once.
What about you? In the statement above, you make God's Word to be a lie, by calling David a murderer.
"If we say that we have not sinned, we make him a liar, and his word is not in us" (1 Jn. 1:10 AV).
Now, if I sin, I have an Advocate with the Father, Jesus Christ The Righteous One. But I know that there is another power, the prince of the air, who has his opwn advocates. You're not one of those, are you? Have you ever sinned? Have you ever looked on a woman with lust in your heart? Come on now, confess. If you have, or looked on an acquaintance with murder in your eye, wishing he/she were dead, you're no different than David.
The beam, man, the beam.
Who is telling the truth in this matter, you or I? (God will judge.)
One of us is not in fellowship with the Christ of The Bible, guided by His Spirit the Comforter, and proclaiming His Gospel as a herald, an unashamed workman, rightly dividing the Word of The Truth. One of us is walking in the dark.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.